Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE

LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 41 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,900,101 to it, the largest being The Ford Foundation ($5,226,046). 27 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$9.6M
Revenue FY2024
41
Funders on record
$16M
Grants received
$11M
Net assets
27/41 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 65%

Against its field

LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 11,749 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin36% · top quartile
Months of reserve7.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)51% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,749 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($2.8M) Expenses 100 ($10k) Net assets 100 ($2.8M)2022 Revenue 202 ($5.6M) Expenses 38518 ($3.9M) Net assets 162 ($4.5M)2023 Revenue 272 ($7.5M) Expenses 48707 ($4.9M) Net assets 257 ($7.1M)2024 Revenue 347 ($9.6M) Expenses 61031 ($6.2M) Net assets 381 ($11M)
2021202220232024
Revenue (347)Expenses (61031)Net assets (381)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

98% of LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,312 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.8M
21
$1.7M
22
$2.6M
23
$3.4M
24
7.3
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 27 funders, grant income rose $438k → $4.5M.

11 of 41 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)16% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 41 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 33% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

33%
largest funder
52%
top three
~7
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 23% · 2022 31% · 2023 42%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 10 states in all.

WA
MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.5M arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 41 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $108 on record.

State$108
Top programs
  • REFUNDS - GENERAL $108

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 16%Fundraising 4%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 28 states

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
MS
AL
GA
FL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Local Progress Policy Action · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE?
LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 41 organizations whose IRS filings report $15,900,101 to it, the largest being The Ford Foundation ($5,226,046). 27 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE have?
IRS filings report 41 organizations giving $15,900,101 in grants to LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE, 27 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE?
The Ford Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $5,226,046 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LOCAL PROGRESS POLICY INSTITUTE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 41funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing