Skip to content

Nebraska · Nonprofit

NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE

NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE (Nebraska) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,302,789 to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($6,026,295). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$2.0M
Funders on record
21
Grants received
$12M
Net assets
$2.7M
15/21 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Nebraska Civic Engagement Table does

Mission

The Nebraska Civic Engagement Table works with nonprofits to increase voting and build an engaged nebraska.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Through programs such as organizer school; capacity, data, and resources to help our members engage communities in civic engagement and nonpartisan election education; policy training program called lobby school; and management/facilitation of several coalitions and working groups. Organizer school is a comprehensive training program. We have a staff member placed with two uniqure member organizations to increase capacity and ensure sustainable organizing presence in communities throughout greater nebraska. In 2024, the program evolved from not only hiring organizers to be placed with members, to also include training modules to enhance skills of organizers employed within the network. Participants of this program support community building, election education and outreach, and responsiveness to local and state policy issues within the scope of the organization's mission. The program also aims to develop and grow the leadership pipeline in these geographies.lobby school takes a 360-approach to movement building by connecting elections and grassroots efforts to policy work. It is designed to expand the existing advocacy infrastructure and build power within nebraska's non-profit…

    $1,958,252 spentof which $478,645 as grants$49,658 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $1,958,252.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($650k) Expenses 100 ($637k) Net assets 100 ($120k)2018 Revenue 121 ($787k) Expenses 129 ($819k) Net assets 73 ($88k)2019 Revenue 137 ($891k) Expenses 140 ($894k) Net assets 70 ($84k)2020 Revenue 262 ($1.7M) Expenses 252 ($1.6M) Net assets 148 ($178k)2021 Revenue 302 ($2.0M) Expenses 177 ($1.1M) Net assets 1278 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 212 ($1.4M) Expenses 252 ($1.6M) Net assets 1090 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 580 ($3.8M) Expenses 306 ($1.9M) Net assets 2610 ($3.1M)2024 Revenue 314 ($2.0M) Expenses 394 ($2.5M) Net assets 2219 ($2.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (314)Expenses (394)Net assets (2219)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.3M to $3.3M (+144%).

$143k
$94k
$94k
$181k
$1.5M
$1.3M
$3.3M
$2.7M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 6% · 2021 5% · 2023 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,024 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$13k
’17
−$32k
’18
−$4k
’19
$93k
’20
$833k
’21
−$225k
’22
$1.8M
’23
−$473k
’24
5.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Meg Mikolajczyk

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1010101112121111
Joined·+4+2+4+1+4+3+2
No longer listed·4230442
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $558k → $1.8M.

4 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 49% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

49%
largest funder
77%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 60% · 2018 70% · 2019 59% · 2020 23% · 2021 39% · 2022 32% · 2023 46% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

62% of NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

92% of NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE's grant income comes from Nebraska funders.

WA
NY
MA
NE
NC
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Nebraska out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $578k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE has grown faster than half of the 976 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−23% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve5.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)18% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 976 civil rights nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nebraska

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 16%Fundraising 6%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE?
NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE (Nebraska) receives grants from 21 organizations whose IRS filings report $12,302,789 to it, the largest being THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION ($6,026,295). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE have?
IRS filings report 21 organizations giving $12,302,789 in grants to NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE?
THE SHERWOOD FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $6,026,295 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NEBRASKA CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 21 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing