Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc

To provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
135
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$595MHealth$44MYouth Development$13MEmployment$11MHuman Services$6.4MCommunity Improvement$6.3MCivil Rights$6.0MEducation$5.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 135 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 135 grants below total $17,869,471 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $18,357,973 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $488,502 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $163k
  • $10k–50k63 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k42 grants · $3.5M
  • $250k+7 grants · $13M
$16,990
Median grant
15
States reached
$33.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FUTURO HEALTH$10,000,000
National Council For Mental Wellbeing$1,176,882
Nat'l Assoc Of Community Health Centers$550,000
University Of Hawaii Foundation$490,000
University Of Hawaii$350,000
Trustees Of Tufts College$350,000
Native Hawaiian Education Association$300,000
Aogf$195,148
Project Vision Hawaii$180,000
Maui Family Support Services Inc$150,000
Maui Economic Development Board Inc$120,000
Maui Roots Reborn$120,000
American Heart Association Inc$107,500
Smithsonian Institution$100,000
Hawaii Investment Ready$98,977
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $200k → 10%Change Machine: $40k → 20%NATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL: $639k → 14%Baltimore Action Legal Team: $50k → 19%Info Line Of San Diego County: $157k → 11%Give Foundation Inc: $68k → 9%INFO LINE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY: $63k → 11%Maui Roots Reborn: $120k → 9%Byrd Barr Place: $50k → 9%United Territories Of Pacific Islanders: $50k → 9%American National Red Cross: $520k → 10%SEATTLE KING CTY COALITION ON HOMELESSNESS: $100k → 9%Helping Hands Hawaii: $50k → 9%P'ship For Advancement Of New Americans: $50k → 11%HOMELESS HEALTH CARE LOS ANGELES: $100k → 14%TIDES CENTER - Center for Care Innovations: $389k → 10%Elepaio Social Services: $80k → 9%Young Womens Christian Assoc Of Sonoma Cty: $63k → 10%Alternative Structures International: $75k → 9%Na Hoaloha-maui Interfaith Volunteer: $50k → 9%Elepaio Social Services: $50k → 9%Housing California: $250k → 12%Latino Center For Prevention And Action: $50k → 12%Helping Hands Hawaii: $50k → 9%United States Veterans Initiative: $85k → 9%United States Veterans Initiative: $50k → 9%American National Red Cross: $100k → 14%Tides Center: $1.8M → 10%TIDES CENTER LEADERSPRING: $538k → 10%Tides Center: $90k → 10%LANAKILA PACIFIC: $90k → 9%Lanakila Pacific: $90k → 9%Partners In Care Oahu Continuum Of Care: $50k → 9%Kualoa-heeia Ecumenical Youth Key: $95k → 9%Young Womens Christian Association: $125k → 9%Hawaii Appleseed Center For Law & Economic Justice: $110k → 9%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $95k → 9%Young Womens Christian Association: $75k → 9%Hawaii Appleseed Center For Law And: $75k → 9%HI Appleseed Ctr For Law & Economic Justice: $55k → 9%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $55k → 9%Hawaii Appleseed Ctr for L&E Justice: $54k → 9%Innercity Struggle: $50k → 14%Hawaii Appleseed: $50k → 9%Young Womens Christian Association: $50k → 9%HAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW & ECONOMIC JUSTICE: $50k → 9%Young Womens Christian Association of Oahu: $39k → 9%YMCA Of Honolulu: $33k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$43M · 236 repeat orgs$58M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

236 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2024, 173 since wound down; 68 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

236
305

Total granted

$43M
$44M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+21%

Still filing today

92%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +63%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    3× · 2018–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +33%
  • NF
    NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $2.2M · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • KF
    KAISER FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE
    one grant, 2018 · $15M · revenue -95% · 100% of their budget
  • HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $4.5M · revenue +9%
  • GW
    GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3.3M · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
California Chamber of Commerce

Represent members and cal employers to members of cal legislature and other agencies of state government through in-house legislative analysts, lobbying staff, and contract lobbyists. cal chamber publishes books and software related to…

—
3
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
4
Integrated Healthcare Association

Iha's mission is to bring the healthcare community together to solve industry-wide challenges that stand in the way of high-value care. as a non-profit industry association, we use objective data, our decades of expertise, and our unique…

—
5
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
6
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
7
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

—
8
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
9
Kfhpw Holdings

Supporting kaiser permanente organizations which provide high-quality, affordable health care services to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve.

—
10
California Hotel & Lodging Association

CH&LA operate to protect the right and interest of the California lodging industry. Legislative advocacy, educational training, communication, and cost-savings programs are provided for all segments of the industry. In addition, CH&LA…

—
11
Health Center Partners of Southern California

Health center partners of southern california (formerly: council of community clinics) ("hcp") was established in 1977 as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation.a premier consortium of primary healthcare organizations, hcp is an advocate for…

—
12
California Apartment Association

The organization's mission is to represent the ethical members of the rental housing industry in all aspects of government affairs within the state of california, and to provide information, products and services which contribute to the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Evidence for Healthcare Improvement and the most unlike its peers is Lunalilo Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportYouth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Cancer Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Development ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity College Foundatio…Community FoundationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%17%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%3%20–35yr11%3%35–55yr13%87%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%5/625
the rest of the field
14%
26,000/186,353

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

546 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 546 of the 625 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
116
Early backer (in before they grew)
533/546
Grantees still filing
372/546
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $593,000,000 · PhilanthropyEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+11 more — $7,059,558 · PhilanthropyKAISER FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE — $15,000,000 · HealthFUTURO HEALTH — $10,000,000 · HealthNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $2,357,882 · HealthNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES — $1,975,000 · Health+36 more — $9,998,780 · HealthHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $4,500,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $1,835,652 · OtherGovernor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee — $1,000,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON — $986,405 · OtherINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $2,008,812 · OtherALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $1,359,106 · Other+92 more — $17,057,583 · OtherGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $3,250,000 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $2,275,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $2,155,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE — $1,000,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $507,700 · Arts & CultureTIDES CENTER — $2,781,323 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $675,834 · Human ServicesNATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL — $648,750 · Human ServicesSafe Routes to School National — $459,642 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OAHU — $438,884 · Human ServicesHAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE — $401,330 · Human ServicesHOUSING CALIFORNIA INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesLATINO HEALTH ACCESS — $250,000 · Human Services+14 more — $1,584,331 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP — $1,975,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $889,713 · EducationMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $501,250 · EducationAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $404,310 · EducationHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $394,500 · EducationTrustees of Tufts College — $350,000 · EducationTRUST FOR AMERICAS HEALTH — $300,000 · EducationNATIVE HAWAIIAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION — $300,000 · EducationNA LEI WILI AREA HEALTH EDUCATION CENTER — $273,350 · Education+7 more — $618,192 · Education
Philanthropy$600,059,558Health$39,331,662Other$28,747,558Recreation & Sports$10,000,000Arts & Culture$9,187,700Human Services$7,490,094Education$6,506,315

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $593,000,000 over 4y, 67% of budgetKAISER FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE — $15,000,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetFUTURO HEALTH — $10,000,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $4,500,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $3,250,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $2,781,323 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,735,600 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $2,357,882 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $2,275,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $2,155,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS — $2,008,812 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY — $2,000,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES — $1,975,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP — $1,975,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetLOS ANGELES EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP — $1,835,652 over 2y, 25% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $1,359,106 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetGovernor Newsoms Ballot Measure Committee — $1,000,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL EVENTS COMMITTEE — $1,000,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $985,479 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION — $889,713 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $828,958 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $675,834 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPartnership for a Healthier America Inc — $650,000 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL — $648,750 over 2y, 30% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $629,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE RX PRICING — $625,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $620,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $610,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE — $553,630 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetENROLL AMERICA — $550,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES — $550,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $550,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE INC — $550,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $501,250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKNOWLEDGE ECOLOGY INTERNATIONAL — $500,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER — $500,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMental Health America of Greater Houston Inc — $500,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM INC — $500,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INC — $460,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetSafe Routes to School National — $459,642 over 2y, 34% of budgetEVIDENCE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT — $450,000 over 3y, 7.1% of budgetPROJECT VISION HAWAII — $450,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OAHU — $438,884 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $404,310 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE — $401,330 over 7y, 10% of budgetHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $394,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MAUI INC — $370,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Atherton Family Found…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Aloha United Way IncBank of Hawaii Charit…Stupski FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…The Harry and Jeanett…Central Pacific Bank …Tradewind Group Found…McInerny Foundation--Trustees of the Estat…First Insurance Compa…
Atherton Family FoundationHI71.4× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Atherton Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Aloha United Way Inc · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Stupski Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Tradewind Group Foundation · McInerny Foundation-- · Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Dba Kamehameha Schools · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
  • National Association of School Nurses — 15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • National Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Central City Concern — 10% of income from government
  • Center for Health Care Strategies Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Evidence for Healthcare Improvement — 0% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Medical Society — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 625 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home