Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE INC (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 8 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $12,692,741 in grants to it, the largest being The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation ($6,423,374). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE INC's revenue fell 63% between 2017 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,792 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$158k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $441k and 2 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 79% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 62% · 2021 53% · 2022 55% · 2023 46% · 2024 62% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
63% of HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 75% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
HEALTH CARE COST INSTITUTE INC draws 96% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C. — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 7 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $913k on record — $313k federal, $600k state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing