Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE

A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,645,460 to it, the largest being AMERICA'S AGENDA HEALTH CARE FOR ALL ($1,670,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$3.1M
Funders on record
23
Grants received
$2.6M
Net assets
$184k
10/23 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%
01What it does

What A Philip Randolph Institute does

Mission

Apri's primary mission is to fight for racial equality and economic justice. It works with black trade unionists and the black community. Apri spearheads the "black labor alliance" an iniative to build black community support for the trade union movement and to convey to labor the needs and concerns of black americans. It has 114 chapters in 36 states.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Civic engagement programfunding for apri's civic engagement program at the national level is for general operating support, and in the field for our civic engagement programs across selected target states and communities such as:1. Convening events, webinars, and in-depth training sessions during regional and local chapter events to equip members with the tools they need to build capacity for participating in civic events.2. Providing ongoing trainings for apri chapters' program volunteers and staff' producing and disseminating collateral items (t-shirts, fliers, posters, etc.)3. Mobilizing communities around fair-election advocacy to remove barriers to registration and voting, particularly those disenfranchised, underrepresented, and marginalized communities.

    $1,087,532 spentof which $6,000 as grants$1,229,667 earned by the program
    40% of program spending
  2. Health care literacy and accessfor more than 12 years, apri's organizational focus has been on highlighting health care disparities in the minority communities with particular focus on african americans. One of the most glaring and despairing issues faced by many minorities, in particular african americans, has been race-based disparities in health and healthcare services. Apri seeks to eliminate racial disparities in healthcare by advocating for policies and legislation which support equal access to healthcare services for all americans, and by providing education on access to health insurance. To address these disparities, and to provide a forum to mobilize our communities around healthcare issues, apri features a healthcare symposium during the annual national education conference. This symposium features special forums on solutions for addressing health needs, along with training tracks on obesity, heart disease and diabetes in a format which encourages taking a pro-active approach to improving health concerns. When possible, the conference presents health screening and exhibits covering all aspects of health from: hiv/aids screening & counseling, diabetes, glaucoma, bmi,…

    $543,765 spent$614,834 earned by the program
    20% of program spending
  3. Racial and economic justice programat the onset of the 2020 covid-19 pandemic, apri's focus was to amplify the systemic racism that exposed disparities in communities of color which were already adversely impacted by food deserts, financial deserts, inadequate healthcare services, and crippled transportation systems. Insufficient access to and affordability of broadband/internet services expanded the racial divide, and stifled the ability for our communities to work and learn in a virtual/remote environment. Disproportionate distribution of survival tools and information, such as ppe, food and water, and transportation services to vaccination locations made it impossible for families to receive the care they needed and were left severely devastated by the effects of the pandemic.asa philip randolph and bayard rustin founded the a. Philip randolph institute in 1965 with the mission of fighting for both racial equality and economic justice by employing the american democratic process. They emphasized racial equality and the power of the vote.

    $679,707 spent$768,542 earned by the program
    25% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $407,824 spent$461,125 earned by the program
    15% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,718,828.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($661k) Expenses 100 ($687k) Net assets 100 ($286k)2018 Revenue 97 ($640k) Expenses 88 ($602k) Net assets 113 ($324k)2019 Revenue 105 ($691k) Expenses 132 ($904k) Net assets 38 ($110k)2020 Revenue 88 ($580k) Expenses 78 ($537k) Net assets 53 ($153k)2021 Revenue 108 ($714k) Expenses 98 ($676k) Net assets 67 ($191k)2022 Revenue 90 ($593k) Expenses 98 ($675k) Net assets 38 ($110k)2023 Revenue 84 ($555k) Expenses 100 ($690k) Net assets -9 ($-24395)2024 Revenue 103 ($678k) Expenses 104 ($716k) Net assets -22 ($-62339)2025 Revenue 465 ($3.1M) Expenses 412 ($2.8M) Net assets 64 ($184k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (465)Expenses (412)Net assets (64)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $523k to $280k (−46%).

$476k
$523k
$280k
$332k
$374k
$405k
$300k
$177k
$392k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$26k
’17
$38k
’18
−$214k
’19
$43k
’20
$38k
’21
−$82k
’22
−$134k
’23
−$38k
’24
$246k
’25
1.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Fred Redmond

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed464646353329293232
Joined·+0+1+9+2+1+0+9+0
No longer listed·012045060
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 7 funders to 5 funders, grant income fell $79k → $57k.

2 of 23 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $1.3M from 13 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations). These are real filings, and they are not money A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE raised.

From the IRS filings of A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE.

63%
largest funder
75%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 33% · 2018 34% · 2019 27% · 2020 77% · 2021 100% · 2022 33% · 2023 35% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

8% of A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 43% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

75% of A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.

IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
GA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $165k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

96% of spending goes to programs.

Program 96%Management 4%Fundraising 0%

Governance

29
board members
97%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Apri Educational Fund · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE?
A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 23 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,645,460 to it, the largest being AMERICA'S AGENDA HEALTH CARE FOR ALL ($1,670,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE have?
IRS filings report 23 organizations giving $2,645,460 in grants to A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE?
AMERICA'S AGENDA HEALTH CARE FOR ALL is the largest funder on record, with $1,670,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like A PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 23 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing