· Private foundation
Tradewind Group Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k100 grants · $323k
- $10k–50k41 grants · $764k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $404k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,510 |
| US-JAPAN COUNCIL | $100,000 |
| PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF HAWAII FOUNDATION | $78,745 |
| HAWAII EXECUTIVE COLLABORATIVE | $75,000 |
| HAWAII UNITED OKINAWA ASSOCIATION | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $41,210 |
| HAWAII FOODBANK INC | $34,660 |
| KAPIOLANI HEALTH FOUNDATION | $32,500 |
| UH FOUNDATION | $31,906 |
| KUPU | $27,500 |
| YMCA OF HONOLULU | $25,600 |
| HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO | $25,000 |
| GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII | $25,000 |
| HOUSING HAWAII'S FUTURE | $25,000 |
| CENTER FOR TOMORROW'S LEADERS | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $315k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
154 repeat relationships — 87 still active in FY2025, 67 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $362k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPUBLIC SCHOOLS OF HAWAII FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $428k · revenue +114% · 34% of their budget
- HEHAWAII EXECUTIVE COLLABORATIVE6× · 2020–2025 · $391k · revenue +92%
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $227k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $126k
- BBBLOOD BANK OF HAWAIIone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +12%
- HSHAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2023 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…
The kuki'o ho'omana fund seeks to uplift and enrich our hawai'i island community through intentional investments in curated local organizations focusing on youth empowerment, affordable housing, environmental preservation, cultural…
Hawai`i people`s fund supports, funds, and amplifies the work of hawai`i- based grassroots organizations challenging systems of oppression.
To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.
Kapi'olani medical specialists (dba hawai'i pacific health medical group) is a multispecialty provider group dedicated to providing world-class care for adults and children across hawai'i and the pacific region working in partnership with…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partners in Development Foundation and the most unlike its peers is T Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
177 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 177 of the 343 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII EXECUTIVE COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Straub Foundation ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR TOMORROW'S LEADERS ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PUBLIC RADIO ↗
- Who funds Kapi'olani Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds OAHU ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD ↗
- Who funds HAWAII UNITED OKINAWA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD BANK OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds KUPU ↗
- Who funds DYNAMIC COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOVERS AND SHAKAS ↗
- Who funds JAPAN-AMERICA SOCIETY OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds HOUSING HAWAII'S FUTURE ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF HONOLULU ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII FOODBANK INC ↗
- Who funds HOLOMUA COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds MANA UP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PURPLE MAIA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · J Watumull Fund · Aloha United Way Inc · First Insurance Company of Hawaii Charitable Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · First Hawaiian Bank Foundation · Kosasa Foundation · McInerny Foundation-- · The Queen's Medical Center · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · Finance Factors Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tradewind Group Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Tradewind Group Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Tradewind Group Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.