Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

California · Nonprofit

SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE

SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE (California) receives grants from 194 organizations whose IRS filings report $41,984,774 to it, the largest being THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ($7,053,000). 101 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$8.1M
Revenue FY2024
194
Funders on record
$42M
Grants received
$-566155
Net assets
101/194 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 57%

Against its field

SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE's funding base is broadening — from 48 funders to 57 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−57% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.1mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,723 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($13M) Expenses 100 ($15M) Net assets 100 ($11M)2018 Revenue 118 ($15M) Expenses 110 ($17M) Net assets 98 ($10M)2019 Revenue 183 ($23M) Expenses 112 ($17M) Net assets 272 ($29M)2020 Revenue 151 ($19M) Expenses 197 ($30M) Net assets 163 ($17M)2021 Revenue 107 ($13M) Expenses 123 ($19M) Net assets 124 ($13M)2022 Revenue 92 ($12M) Expenses 89 ($13M) Net assets 91 ($9.6M)2023 Revenue 74 ($9.3M) Expenses 98 ($15M) Net assets 48 ($5.1M)2024 Revenue 65 ($8.1M) Expenses 84 ($13M) Net assets -5 ($-566155)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (65)Expenses (84)Net assets (-5)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 12% · 2018 11% · 2019 15% · 2020 32% · 2021 25% · 2022 47% · 2023 33% · 2024 41%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

92% of SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,882 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$2.5M
17
$1.7M
18
$6.1M
19
$11M
20
$5.1M
21
$1.9M
22
$5.6M
23
$4.6M
24
0.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 48 funders to 57 funders, grant income rose $1.8M → $2.5M.

24 of 194 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 194 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE.

17%
largest funder
45%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 16% · 2018 19% · 2019 37% · 2020 24% · 2021 37% · 2022 45% · 2023 40%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

29% of SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 52% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

96% of SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
ID
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
DE
AZ
NM
NC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16M arriving through sponsors registered in 14 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 194 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

71% of spending goes to programs.

Program 71%Management 12%Fundraising 17%

Governance

28
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

82%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Parks Alliance Builds LLC · disregarded

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE?
SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE (California) receives grants from 194 organizations whose IRS filings report $41,984,774 to it, the largest being THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ($7,053,000). 101 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE have?
IRS filings report 194 organizations giving $41,984,774 in grants to SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE, 101 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE?
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY is the largest funder on record, with $7,053,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 194funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing