Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Community foundation

East Bay Community Foundation

The EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is a leading resource for mobilizing resources and community leadership to transform the lives of people in the east bay with pressing needs.

$67M
Granted FY2025still arriving
842
Grants FY2025still arriving
33
States reached
$5.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$350MEducation$125MEmployment$83MCommunity Improvement$73MHousing & Shelter$48MCivil Rights$37MHuman Services$26MYouth Development$25MOther$0
02FY2025 · 842 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 842 grants below total $62,841,046 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $66,946,754 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,105,708 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k125 grants · $881k
  • $10k–50k481 grants · $10M
  • $50k–250k199 grants · $19M
  • $250k+37 grants · $33M
$25,000
Median grant
33
States reached
$514M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION$5,500,000
FIRE AID$3,862,675
VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND$2,287,159
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC$2,260,634
COMMON HEALTH COALITION$2,013,732
COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC$1,541,000
PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS$1,500,000
RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$1,472,146
CITY OF OAKLAND DEPARTMENT OF VIOLENCE PREVENTION$1,012,000
CHURCH WORLD SERVICE$800,000
CALIFORNIA ROWING CLUB$755,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND$672,135
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$536,197
ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES$500,742
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$500,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $49.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MINNESOTA 8: $200k → 14%LATINO HEALTH ACCESS: $160k → 10%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $309k → 15%OHANA HO'OPAKELE: $210k → 15%IMAGINE BLACK FUTURES: $250k → 8%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $250k → 12%NATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS COUNCIL: $1.5M → 14%CIVICA FOUNDATION: $10.0M → 8%YMCA OF CENTRAL MARYLAND: $167k → 11%PORTLAND AFRICAN-AMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM: $250k → 12%NATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS COUNCIL: $1.0M → 14%SEAC VILLAGE: $190k → 10%URBAN LEAGUE OF PORTLAND: $250k → 12%CHANGE MACHINE: $2.5M → 20%CHANGE MACHINE: $900k → 20%ALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE: $2.5M → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE OAHU: $300k → 9%BON SECOURS OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $260k → 19%HUMANIDAD THERAPY & EDUCATION SERVICES: $250k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $265k → 10%CENTER FOR EMPOWERING REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS: $215k → 10%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $178k → 10%ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP: $160k → 16%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $505k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $358k → 10%ALL HOME: $300k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $200k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $225k → 9%COMMON HEALTH COALITION: $2.0M → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $200k → 14%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT: $342k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $5.2M → 10%GENERATION HOUSING FS TIDES CENTER: $250k → 10%BLACK ORGANIZING PROJECT: $160k → 10%VIETRISE FS KOREAN RESOURCE CENTER: $190k → 14%BAY AREA COUNCIL FOUNDATION: $400k → 10%VILLAGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $206k → 9%CENTER FOR CARE INNOVATIONS FS TIDES CENTER: $500k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $300k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $235k → 10%INSIGHT HOUSING: $174k → 10%YMCA OF THE EAST BAY: $170k → 10%K TO COLLEGE: $550k → 10%K TO COLLEGE: $175k → 10%BANANAS INC: $227k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $208k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $191k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $181k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of East Bay Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

East Bay Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$752M · 1124 repeat orgs$115M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

1124 repeat relationships — 555 still active in FY2025, 569 since wound down; 172 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1124
642

Total granted

$752M
$100M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

90%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FH
    FUTURO HEALTH
    3× · 2021–2023 · $103M · revenue ×38
  • Public Health Institute
    4× · 2021–2024 · $40M · revenue +6%
  • TP
    THE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $16M · revenue +150% · 36% of their budget

Funded once

  • CF
    CIVICA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10M · revenue -75%
  • HS
    HEALTH SHARE OF OREGONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5.1M · revenue +49%
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M · revenue -77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
California Competes

California Competes: Higher Education for a Strong Economy is a nonpartisan policy and research organization focused on identifying solutions to the states most critical challenges at the intersection of higher education, equity, and the…

Education
3
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
4
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
5
California Forward

California forward (ca fwd) brings people together across regions to improve government and create resilient growth statewide.

Public Benefit
6
California Water Data Consortium

The California Water Data Consortium is an independent, nonprofit organization created by a partnership of state agencies and others to ensure that Californians have access to the best possible water and ecological information to make…

Science & Tech
7
California Coastkeeper

California Coastkeeper Alliance coordinates, supports & enhances the work of the local California Waterkeeper programs to provide a statewide voice for safeguarding California's waters, and its world renowned coast & ocean, for the benefit…

Environment
8
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

the organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the UCSF Foundation.

Education
10
Children's Council of San Francisco

Since 1974, Children's Council has been at the heart of early care and education in San Francisco.

Human Services
11
Center for Domestic Peace

Center for Domestic Peace mobilizes individuals and communities to transform our world so domestic violence no longer exists, creating greater safety, justice, and equality.

Human Services
12
The American Institute of Architects

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is International Tennis Hall of Fame. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Women & Girls Leadership De…Christian Missionary Organi…Ymca Youth DevelopmentLgbtq+ Community SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesYouth Mentoring ProgramsAddiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Faith-Based Social ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsUnited Way AffiliatesPublic Library OperationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Food PantriesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsAnimal Rescue and ShelterChristian Youth CampsSchool District FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Dance Arts OrganizationsMilitary Veterans SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Development CentersSenior Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesLocal History MuseumsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Independent K-12 SchoolsElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity College Foundatio…Community Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsCancer Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%5%<5yr15%11%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%20%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%31/2,372
the rest of the field
14%
25,981/184,606

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

1809 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1809 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

127
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
455
Early backer (in before they grew)
1769/1809
Grantees still filing
1152/1809
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FUTURO HEALTH — $102,500,000 · HealthFUTURO HEALTHPublic Health Institute — $40,077,784 · HealthPublic Health InstituteTHE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INC — $16,438,601 · HealthTHE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INCCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NETWORK INC — $15,893,048 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NETWORK INC+42 more — $120,267,478 · Health+42 moreOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $29,685,487 · OtherOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM — $20,010,000 · OtherALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEMHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $11,450,000 · OtherHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INCALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $18,246,195 · OtherALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERAT…THE GARDENS AT PALMDALE — $7,948,966 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $9,636,003 · Other+77 more — $110,627,768 · Other+77 moreAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC — $14,500,000 · EducationAMERICAN NU…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $9,068,631 · EducationUNIVERSITY …OAKLAND PROMISE — $8,264,806 · EducationOAKLAND PRO…THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $7,305,809 · EducationTHE OAKLAND…The George Washington University — $4,950,000 · EducationThe George …SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $3,668,131 · Education+18 more — $21,956,829 · Education+18 moreENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $13,800,000 · Community ImprovementPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC — $9,000,000 · Community ImprovementLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $8,261,442 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $4,500,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK — $3,251,500 · Community ImprovementSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC — $2,877,057 · Community ImprovementBLACK CULTURAL ZONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $2,454,550 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING — $2,065,739 · Community Improvement+9 more — $8,792,487 · Community ImprovementTIDES CENTER — $10,135,745 · Human ServicesCIVICA FOUNDATION — $10,000,000 · Human ServicesChange Machine — $3,483,412 · Human ServicesALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE — $2,515,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL — $2,500,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH INNOVATION — $2,106,982 · Human Services+11 more — $9,052,822 · Human ServicesTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $9,322,245 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $6,004,828 · PhilanthropyEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION — $2,700,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $1,581,931 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,524,880 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $1,472,146 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $1,267,904 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,095,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $2,102,153 · PhilanthropyMK LEVEL PLAYING FIELD INSTITUTE — $19,789,999 · Social ScienceTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $750,000 · Social Science
Health$295,176,911Other$207,604,419Education$69,714,206Community Improvement$55,002,775Human Services$39,793,961Philanthropy$27,071,087Social Science$20,539,999

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPublic Health Institute — $40,077,784 over 4y, 12% of budgetMK LEVEL PLAYING FIELD INSTITUTE — $19,789,999 over 7y, 61% of budgetALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC — $18,246,195 over 2y, 52% of budgetTHE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INC — $16,438,601 over 6y, 36% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NETWORK INC — $15,893,048 over 4y, 45% of budgetAMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC — $14,500,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC — $13,800,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC — $11,450,000 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $10,135,745 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetCIVICA FOUNDATION — $10,000,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $9,636,003 over 4y, 12% of budgetAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION — $9,471,765 over 2y, 29% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $9,322,245 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $9,068,631 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC — $9,000,000 over 4y, 46% of budgetVOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND — $8,955,042 over 2y, 31% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE — $8,264,806 over 9y, 30% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $8,261,442 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetTRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION — $8,250,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $8,202,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetTHE GARDENS AT PALMDALE — $7,948,966 over 3y, 88% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $7,305,809 over 9y, 17% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $7,079,988 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHAYWARD SISTERS HOSPITAL DBA ST ROSE HOSPITAL — $7,000,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $6,362,500 over 6y, 99% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $6,004,828 over 9y, 8.8% of budgetCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $5,725,000 over 4y, 24% of budgetLA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC — $5,231,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetLIFELONG MEDICAL CARE — $5,195,987 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetHEALTH SHARE OF OREGON — $5,100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $5,000,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetCALIFORNIA ROWING CLUB — $4,989,540 over 9y, 94% of budgetThe George Washington University — $4,950,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC — $4,825,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetWELLSPACE HEALTH — $4,777,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS — $4,500,000 over 2y, 31% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $3,668,131 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetChange Machine — $3,483,412 over 3y, 40% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $3,255,768 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetPOLICYLINK — $3,251,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $3,061,800 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC — $3,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC — $2,877,057 over 7y, 6.8% of budgetChangeLab Solutions — $2,861,268 over 4y, 12% of budgetEAT LEARN PLAY FOUNDATION — $2,700,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetALAMEDA POINT COLLABORATIVE — $2,515,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH CARE FOR HOMELESS COUNCIL — $2,500,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetBLACK CULTURAL ZONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $2,454,550 over 5y, 22% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUTURO HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds Public Health Institute ↗
  • Who funds MK LEVEL PLAYING FIELD INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR A HEALTHIER GENERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PUBLIC GOOD PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CIVICA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC COMMUNITY VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds VOSE RIVER CHARITABLE FUND ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH INITIATIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDENS AT PALMDALE ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAYWARD SISTERS HOSPITAL DBA ST ROSE HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFELONG MEDICAL CARE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH SHARE OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA ROWING CLUB ↗
  • Who funds The George Washington University ↗
  • Who funds INITIATIVE FOR A COMPETITIVE INNER CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPACE HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sunlight GivingThe Zellerbach Family…Walter and Elise Haas…Bernard E & Alba Witk…Akonadi FoundationDean and Margaret Les…Kenneth Rainin Founda…Sutter Bay HospitalsUnited Way of the Bay…Tipping Point Communi…The Morris Stulsaft F…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
Sunlight GivingCA133.5× affinity142 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sunlight Giving · The Zellerbach Family Foundation · Walter and Elise Haas Fund · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Akonadi Foundation · Dean and Margaret Lesher Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · United Way of the Bay Area · Tipping Point Community · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization East Bay Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Mid Willamette Valley Community Action Agency — 81% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc — 39% of income from government
  • Urban League of Portland Inc — 33% of income from government
  • Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Medical Teams International — 14% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Center for Health Care Strategies Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Health Share of Oregon — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
58report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home