· Public charity
Hispanic Federation Inc
A service-oriented membership organization of health and human service agencies dedicated to addressing the needs of latino and other vulnerable communities across the nation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 437 grants below total $28,248,437 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $30,311,232 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,062,795 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k31 grants · $231k
- $10k–50k241 grants · $6.1M
- $50k–250k141 grants · $13M
- $250k+24 grants · $8.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Flamboyan Foundation | $890,000 |
| VOCES LATINAS Corp | $702,474 |
| Mary Mitchell Family Yth Inc | $669,214 |
| Central American Refugee Ctr | $497,901 |
| Safe Passage Project Corp | $482,310 |
| A I D FOR A I D S Int' Inc | $462,720 |
| URBAN HEALTH PLAN INC | $450,288 |
| Coalition for Humane Imm Right | $379,500 |
| The Resource Cntr for Comm Dev | $375,631 |
| DV7 US Academy Holdings LLC | $353,106 |
| Make the Road New York | $312,491 |
| UnLocal Inc | $300,000 |
| NY COUNCIL ON ADOPT CHILDREN | $287,500 |
| Staten Island Comm Job Center | $250,365 |
| United We Dream Network Inc | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
409 repeat relationships — 238 still active in FY2025, 171 since wound down; 141 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFLAMBOYAN FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +9%
The Resource Center For Community Development Inc6× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +170% · 26% of their budget- FFFoundation for a Better Puerto Rico Inc2× · 2018–2019 · $1.0M · revenue +33%
Funded once
- BIBIG IDEAS CHALLENGEone grant, 2017 · $1.0M
- TITECHNOSERVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $750k · revenue +40%
- CMCoastal Marine Resource Centeone grant, 2019 · $667k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empower latinx immigrants to enhance the social and economic health of our community and people and to hold institutional decision makers accountable to the communities they serve.
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
Our mission is to create, produce and promote the Latinx-Hispanic diverse arts and culture, to educate through workshops in the arts, culture and humanities; Providing a diversity of free entrance events such as cultural festivals,…
Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…
Our mission is to advance racial equity & social justice through the power of our latin roots, culture & community.
A mission of "championing the development of latino individuals and families to create a strong, peaceful community," through its holistic, culturally relevant programming by providing bilingual/bicultural human services.
Caminar latino creates opportunities for latino families to transform their lives and communities and works to change the social conditions that give rise to violence.
Puentes mission is to be an innovator in the development of comprehensive, collaborative and culturally relativistic initiatives that seek to provide permanent, sustainable solutions through addressing root causes, disparities and…
La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is El Centro Hispano Inc and the most unlike its peers is Move to Empower. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
794 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 794 of the 1,088 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PUERTO RICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLAMBOYAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAESTRA MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds The Resource Center For Community Development Inc ↗
- Who funds POPULAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Foundation for a Better Puerto Rico Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE UNITED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Dominican Womens Development Center Inc ↗
- Who funds VOCES LATINAS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN REFUGEE CENTER CARECEN NY ↗
- Who funds MARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds VISION URBANA INC ↗
- Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN HEALTH PLAN INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S THEATRE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds AID FOR AIDS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PROYECTO MATRIA INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE PERIODISMO INVESTIGATIVO INC ↗
- Who funds RED POR LOS DERECHOS DE LA NIEZ Y LA JUVENTUD DE PUERTO RICO ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds HASER Inc ↗
- Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
- Who funds Waves Ahead Corp ↗
- Who funds Alianza Americas ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hispanics in Philanthropy · Unidosus · Puerto Rico Community Foundation Inc · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Center for Popular Democracy Inc · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Asociacion de Salud Primaria de Puerto Rico Inc · The Scherman Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hispanic Federation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hartford Knights Corp — 68% of income from government
- Second Chance Re-Entry Initiative Program — 23% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.