· Public charity
Hispanics in Philanthropy
HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY leverages philanthropic resources to mobilize and amplify the power of our communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 46 grants below total $1,000,641 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,382,680 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $3,382,039 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $502k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $450k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE SEMILLA PROJECT | $100,000 |
| STATE DEMOCRACY PROJECT | $100,000 |
| TRANS QUEER PUEBLO - SEMILLA DE LIBERACIO | $100,000 |
| GEEKDOM LC | $50,000 |
| BABSON COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| THE LATINA CIRCLE | $50,000 |
| WEFUNDER INC | $35,500 |
| P33 | $35,000 |
| PUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST | $35,000 |
| VCFAMILIA | $35,000 |
| MOVIMIENTO ANANSE INC | $30,000 |
| MIAMI FREEDOM PROJECT FOR DEMOCRACY | $18,500 |
| MARINE CONSERVATION WITHOUT BORDERS | $16,410 |
| FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC | $16,000 |
| NET RESOURCE FOUNDATION | $15,992 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $3.4M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: CLIMATE ACTION/COLIBRI · HIPGIVE · GENDER EQUITY
Stated purpose: GENDER EQUITY · CLIMATE ACTION/COLIBRI
Stated purpose: CLIMATE ACTION/COLIBRI
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
108 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 93 since wound down; 29 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $699k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLatino Community Fund Inc4× · 2018–2022 · $351k · revenue +210%
- TATHE ALLAPATTAH COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION3× · 2020–2022 · $267k · revenue +112%
- JIJUSTICE IN MOTION INC4× · 2018–2022 · $250k · revenue +267%
Funded once
- UIUREEKA INCone grant, 2020 · $2.5M
- JFJUSTICE FOR MIGRANT WOMENone grant, 2022 · $926k · revenue +15%
- AIAmerican indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missionsgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Legal, immigration and community organizing
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.
We demand health, dignity, and justice for our communities. We center and amplify Latine voices as we work to transform oppressive systems and narratives and to reclaim control over our bodies and lives. We build power by organizing our…
Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.
Connect immigrants to legal, social, and interpretation services.
By 2050, Latinos will comprise nearly 30 of the US population. Today and in the future, the demographic destiny of the U.S will be characterized by the growing Latino population. In fact, Latinos have an impact in all aspects of life. We…
Caminar latino creates opportunities for latino families to transform their lives and communities and works to change the social conditions that give rise to violence.
Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…
We are latinx and chicanx people who want to see our entire community thrive, brought together by a shared consciousness of the challenges we face and a deep seated need for co-development and kinship across identity, generation, language…
The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc and the most unlike its peers is Northeast New York Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
324 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 324 of the 360 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IMPACTASSETSINC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE FOR MIGRANT WOMEN ↗
- Who funds PUERTO RICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Latino Community Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ALLAPATTAH COLLABORATIVE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON OFFICE ON LATIN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds FILANTROPIA PUERTO RICO INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE IN MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds LATIN AMERICA WORKING GROUP EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Alianza Americas ↗
- Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
- Who funds ASYLUM ACCESS ↗
- Who funds American indians in Texas at the Spanish Colonial Missions ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Social Impact ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE UNITED ↗
- Who funds BLACK LIVES MATTER PHOENIX METRO ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds OUR VOICE NUESTRA VOZ ↗
- Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
- Who funds TRANS QUEER PUEBLO - SEMILLA DE LIBERACION ↗
- Who funds Farmworker Association of Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FUTURO MEDIA GROUP ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE ↗
- Who funds HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS MIGRANT COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FARMWORKER AND LANDSCAPER ADVOCACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
- Who funds Paso del Norte Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds RURAL & MIGRANT MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds AL OTRO LADO ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC ↗
- Who funds INCLUSIVE ACTION FOR THE CITY ↗
- Who funds COLIBRI CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds LIFTFUND INC ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO ↗
- Who funds LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hispanic Federation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Fwdus Education Fund Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Unidosus · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Proteus Fund Inc · The Ford Foundation · Foundation to Promote Open Society · Tides Center
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Hispanics in Philanthropy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pioneer Valley Workers Center Inc — 53% of income from government
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Willamette Valley Law Project Dba Pcun Foundation — 18% of income from government
- Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers Inc — 15% of income from government
- Voz Workers Rights Education Project — 12% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- Bienestar Inc — 8% of income from government
- Community Legal Aid Inc — 5% of income from government
- Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc — 4% of income from government
- Coalition of Florida Farmworker Organizations Inc — 3% of income from government
- Babson College — 3% of income from government
- Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Migrant Justice Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.