· Private foundation
The Scherman Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k40 grants · $74k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $412k
- $50k–250k73 grants · $6.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TIDES FOUNDATION | $225,000 |
| IN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE | $200,000 |
| ARABELLA ADVISORS' WINDWARD FUND | $200,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF NYC | $200,000 |
| NEW YORK FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| STATE VOICES | $150,000 |
| BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE | $150,000 |
| NEW YORK FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| NEW YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE | $125,000 |
| NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS | $125,000 |
| NORTHWEST BRONX COMMUNITY AND CLERGY COALITION | $110,000 |
| ALIGN | $100,000 |
| NORTH STAR FUND | $100,000 |
| PUBLIC POLICY AND EDUCATION FUND OF NEW YORK | $100,000 |
| SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
194 repeat relationships — 89 still active in FY2024, 105 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $718k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +5%
- NYNew York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc4× · 2019–2023 · $675k · revenue +74%
- PMPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND3× · 2021–2023 · $600k · revenue +226%
Funded once
CLIMATE AND CLEAN ENERGY EQUITY FUNDone grant, 2023 · $225k- NCNATURAL CAPITALISM SOLUTIONSone grant, 2019 · $132k
- AOALLIANCE OF RESIDENT THEATRESNEW YORK (ARTNEW YORK)one grant, 2019 · $130k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…
A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
The architectural league of new york supports critically transformative work in the allied fields that shape the built environment. as a vital, independent forum, the league stimulates thinking, debate, and action on today's (continued on…
The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…
Tonyc works through partnerships with social service organizations and city agencies to create theatre troupes with community members who face pressing social, economic, health, and human rights injustices.
The Design Trust for Public Space is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the future of public space in New York City. Our projects bring together city agencies, community groups and private sector experts to make a lasting impact -…
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
Van alen institute helps create equitable cities through community-led inclusive design.
Ncjw ny turns progressive ideals into action, impacting 8,000 new yorkers annually: we provide direct services to support and empower our neighbors in need today - people from all walks of life and all racial and religious backgrounds.…
Spark lasting social justice change, mobilizing people, capital, & expertise for a fair brooklyn.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Bang Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
273 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 273 of the 332 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW YORK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New York Lawyers for the Public Interest Inc ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND ↗
- Who funds STATE VOICES ↗
- Who funds IN OUR OWN VOICE NATIONAL BLACK WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE AGENDA ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN COMMUNITIES TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ECONOMY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LATINA INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH STAR FUND INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
- Who funds URGE UNITE FOR REPRODUCTIVE & GENDER EQUITY ↗
- Who funds VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE CAPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERA AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARTNERSHIP FOR NEW AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds CLIMATE JUSTICE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds ALIGN THE ALLIANCE FOR A GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL ADVOCATES NY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LATINOJUSTICE PRLDEF ↗
- Who funds ADVOCACY INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds SISTERSONG INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOS A NETWORK FOR IDEAS AND ACTION LTD ↗
- Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mertz Gilmore Foundation · The Ford Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · New York Women's Foundation Inc · New York Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Surdna Foundation Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Overbrook Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Scherman Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance — 39% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- American Littoral Society — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Citizen Research Group Inc — 0% of income from government
- Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Scherman Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Scherman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.