Skip to content

Alabama · Nonprofit

KultureCity

KultureCity (Alabama) receives grants from 68 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,656,176 to it, the largest being THE JOHN C KISH FOUNDATION ($1,368,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$8.9M
Funders on record
68
Grants received
$4.7M
Net assets
$2.1M
24/68 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%
01What it does

What KultureCity does

Mission

The Organization's mission is to create a world where individuals with invisible disabilities,and their families are accepted, included, and treated equally. We do this via education, training, and providing tools and resources to the community.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. All KultureCity programs are designed to help integrate individuals w/ invisible disabilities within the community, and to remove societal barriers. The KultureCity Fit program creates opportunities for individual with invisible disabilities & their families to participate in fitness and adaptive wellness activities in supportive & accessible environments. The TabletKulture program provides ipads and other communicative devices to individuals to assist them with communication The toy program provides toys to children with invisible disabilities across the country, especially during holiday seasons and birthdays. We also provide scholarships for individuals in need to assist with Therapy sessions in order to help them meet their potential.

    $1,944,603 spent
    33% of program spending
  2. Sensory initiative: The main goal of the sensory initiative is to provide training to public venues such as sporting arenas, museums, zoos, libraries and resturants across many sectors including but not limited to arts, music, sports, dining and more to make them inclusive at all times to individuals with invisible disabilities, such as those with autism, PTSD, dementia and more. We provide sensory training and education which includes methods to recognize a guest who needs assistance, as well as more effective methods of communication and engagement. We also provide sensory tools such as headphones, fidget tools, weighted lap pads and feeling charts.We create safe spaces like sensory rooms to be used by individuals experiencing sensory overload.

    $3,029,276 spent
    51% of program spending
  3. The HeartKulture program provides camps,special events and educational workshops for individuals with invisible disabilities,their families, and the community at large.

    $1,004,584 spent
    17% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $5,978,463.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($805k) Expenses 100 ($672k) Net assets 100 ($272k)2018 Revenue 93 ($749k) Expenses 146 ($983k) Net assets 14 ($37k)2019 Revenue 157 ($1.3M) Expenses 180 ($1.2M) Net assets 33 ($90k)2020 Revenue 160 ($1.3M) Expenses 166 ($1.1M) Net assets 97 ($263k)2021 Revenue 274 ($2.2M) Expenses 338 ($2.3M) Net assets 72 ($197k)2022 Revenue 419 ($3.4M) Expenses 519 ($3.5M) Net assets 33 ($89k)2023 Revenue 674 ($5.4M) Expenses 800 ($5.4M) Net assets 52 ($142k)2024 Revenue 876 ($7.1M) Expenses 1065 ($7.2M) Net assets 14 ($39k)2025 Revenue 1101 ($8.9M) Expenses 1006 ($6.8M) Net assets 789 ($2.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (1101)Expenses (1006)Net assets (789)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $875k to $12M (+1281%).

$272k
$37k
$115k
$406k
$701k
$691k
$1.1M
$875k
$12M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 67% · 2018 50% · 2019 57% · 2020 3% · 2021 2% · 2022 1% · 2023 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

55% of KultureCity’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$134k
’17
−$234k
’18
$53k
’19
$173k
’20
−$66k
’21
−$108k
’22
$53k
’23
−$104k
’24
$2.1M
’25
1.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Uma Srivastava

Executive Director

Board chair

Dominique Wilkins

Chairman of the Board

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed91424242624272929
Joined·+6+12+2+4+7+5+6+3
No longer listed·12229243
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 21 funders, grant income rose $169k → $1.2M.

18 of 68 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 40% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KultureCity’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 68 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KultureCity has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KultureCity.

29%
largest funder
51%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 59% · 2018 30% · 2019 55% · 2020 36% · 2021 18% · 2022 29% · 2023 23% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

22% of KultureCity's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 35% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

KultureCity draws 91% of its grant income from funders outside Alabama, across 23 states in all.

WA
IL
MI
NY
NV
SD
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
MO
KY
MD
AR
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alabama out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 15 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

KultureCity runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin24% · top quartile
Months of reserve1.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)35% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like KultureCity

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alabama

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 8%Fundraising 3%

Governance

28
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 8 states

NY
MA
OH
CA
TN
AL
GA
FL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KultureCity: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KultureCity?
KultureCity (Alabama) receives grants from 68 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,656,176 to it, the largest being THE JOHN C KISH FOUNDATION ($1,368,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KultureCity have?
IRS filings report 68 organizations giving $4,656,176 in grants to KultureCity, 24 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KultureCity?
THE JOHN C KISH FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,368,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KultureCity find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alabama. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 68 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing