Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS

GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS (New York) receives grants from 89 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,587,298 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($1,250,200). 48 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$3.4M
Funders on record
89
Grants received
$9.6M
Net assets
$4.4M
48/89 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Grantmakers in the Arts does

Mission

Grantmakers in the Arts (gia) is a national network for private,public, and corporate arts funders and provides leadership and service that advances the use of philanthropic and governmental resources to support the growth of arts and culture.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Conference: Grantmakers in the Arts produces an annual national conference open to all staff and boards of trustees of arts funders. The conference offers 20 - 50 educational sessions on best practices, funding trends, current successful programs, and unique philanthropic challenges. Keynote speakers and artists provide inspirational and educational presentations. Held in a different city each year, sessions also extend to local arts venues for greater impact. The 2023 conference was held in San Juan, Puerto Rico, and was our best-attended ever.

    $1,061,395 spent$801,430 earned by the program
    58% of program spending
  2. Other Programs: This program category includes research on support for individual artists; webinars and podcasts; research on philanthropic trends and issues; the National Capitalization Project; and publication of our online Reader. GIA provides educational content for arts funders through a daily changing newsfeed on itswebsite, on-line webinars open to members and later available to the general public; public podcasts, an online publication (the GIA Reader) featuring trends and relevant issues, online workshops on sound capitalization principles for non-profit arts groups and forums bringing funders together to discuss areas of concernfor the field of arts philanthropy. GIA also engaged in research in the areas of racial equity coding in arts funding and mission-based investing for arts & culture funders, and worked with a futurist consultant to explore how arts funding might be more equitable in a post-pandemic environment.

    $646,881 spent$438,474 earned by the program
    35% of program spending
  3. Arts Education Funders Coalition: The Arts Education Funders Coalition (AEFC) consists of a national group of grantmakers and advocates who engage with GIA and our advocacy consultant Penn Hill Group to advance the role of the arts in federal public policy. Most recently, GIA worked with Representative Suzanne Bonamici (D-OR) on the development of the Arts Education for All Act, the broadest arts education policy bill ever introduced in Congress. GIA influenced the U.S. Department of Education to highlight the importance of equitable access to arts and culture when determining how to reopen schools.

    $84,475 spent$45,000 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  4. OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES 4: Racial Equity in Arts Funding: GIA, in conjunction with True North EDI, leads virtual racial equity in arts funding workshops with a national reach. In conjunction with Hillombo LLC, GIA has developed a racial equity in arts funding community of practice for arts and culture funders actively working to advance racial equity. A webinar available on the GIA website featires GIA and Race Forward discussing the creation and perpetuation of the racial hierarchy, and provides guidance on institutional strategies for diversity, inclusion, and equity. GIA staff attended racial equity facilitation training to enhance workshop offerings.

    $38,000 spent$43,240 earned by the program
    2% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,830,751.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.0M) Expenses 100 ($2.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 98 ($1.9M) Expenses 114 ($2.3M) Net assets 79 ($1.7M)2019 Revenue 154 ($3.1M) Expenses 92 ($1.9M) Net assets 138 ($2.9M)2020 Revenue 47 ($929k) Expenses 84 ($1.7M) Net assets 106 ($2.3M)2021 Revenue 117 ($2.3M) Expenses 90 ($1.8M) Net assets 135 ($2.9M)2022 Revenue 183 ($3.6M) Expenses 127 ($2.6M) Net assets 172 ($3.6M)2023 Revenue 110 ($2.2M) Expenses 128 ($2.6M) Net assets 159 ($3.4M)2024 Revenue 171 ($3.4M) Expenses 123 ($2.5M) Net assets 205 ($4.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (171)Expenses (123)Net assets (205)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $1.7M to $3.0M (+71%).

$2.2M
$1.7M
$3.0M
$2.9M
$3.8M
$4.6M
$4.2M
$4.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 7%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$59k
’17
−$381k
’18
$1.2M
’19
−$782k
’20
$482k
’21
$1.0M
’22
−$419k
’23
$892k
’24
5.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Edwin Torres

President & CEO

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2625242524242526
Joined·+5+5+6+3+0+8+6
No longer listed·6654075
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 35 funders, grant income rose $306k → $1.5M.

10 of 89 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 89 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 13% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

13%
largest funder
35%
top three
~15
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 78% · 2018 18% · 2019 17% · 2020 18% · 2021 12% · 2022 40% · 2023 17% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

48% of GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

50% of GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS's grant income comes from New York funders.

AK
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DE
AZ
AR
DC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
New York out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $610k arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $39k on record.

State$39k
03
06
08
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
26
By state
  • NJ$35k
  • MA$4k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

72% of spending goes to programs.

Program 72%Management 17%Fundraising 11%

Governance

22
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS?
GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS (New York) receives grants from 89 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,587,298 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($1,250,200). 48 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS have?
IRS filings report 89 organizations giving $9,587,298 in grants to GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS, 48 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS?
THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,250,200 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GRANTMAKERS IN THE ARTS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Grantmakers in the Arts →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 89 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing