Loading…
Loading…
Puerto Rico · Nonprofit
PARA LA NATURALEZA INC (Puerto Rico) is funded by 41 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $5,523,079 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($1,627,300). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
PARA LA NATURALEZA INC's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 9 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 282 environment nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The base broadened — 3 funders to 9 as grant income moved $206k → $436k.
8 of 41 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 33% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of PARA LA NATURALEZA INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 41 funders by total. Association, not causation.
PARA LA NATURALEZA INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 29% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 73% · 2018 29% · 2019 38% · 2020 48% · 2021 22% · 2022 27% · 2023 79% · 2024 45% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
24% of PARA LA NATURALEZA INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 37% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
PARA LA NATURALEZA INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Puerto Rico — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 16 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 41 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.7M on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 41funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing