· Private foundation
The Hearst Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k102 grants · $14M
- $250k+9 grants · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Children's Museum of Manhattan | $500,000 |
| Save the Children Federation | $500,000 |
| New Museum | $350,000 |
| Center for Disability Services Inc | $300,000 |
| Hunter College Foundation | $250,000 |
| National Park Foundation | $250,000 |
| NY Pubic Library | $250,000 |
| Crohns & Colitis Foundation | $250,000 |
| The Carnegie Hall Corporation | $250,000 |
| University of Houston | $200,000 |
| New York Foundation for the Arts Inc | $200,000 |
| Family Gateway | $200,000 |
| Oklahoma State University | $200,000 |
| New York City Center | $200,000 |
| White Plains Hospital Medical Center | $200,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
71 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 67 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations2× · 2020–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +55%
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH2× · 2020–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +26%- TCTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION4× · 2020–2024 · $900k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- LCLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INCone grant, 2020 · $2.0M · revenue +13%
- COCORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMSgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $750k · revenue +35%
- CACALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCESgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $750k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Guild for Community Arts Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is Modern States Education Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
556 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 556 of the 651 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MANHATTAN ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
- Who funds THEATRE FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE OPERA ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds THE NEW 42ND STREET INC ↗
- Who funds THE JOFFREY BALLET ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Shubert Foundation Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Robin Hood Foundation · Td Charitable Foundation · Altman Foundation · The Bloomberg Family Foundation Inc · The Pierre & Tana Matisse Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hearst Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mab Community Services Inc — 69% of income from government
- Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation — 31% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- New Jersey Symphony Orchestra — 21% of income from government
- Liberty Science Center — 14% of income from government
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc — 11% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Center for Hope Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc — 1% of income from government
- Community Music Center of Boston Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- University of Maryland Medical System Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Oregon Ballet Theatre — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
- Pequot Library Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Hearst Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Hearst Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.