How much did NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC grant in FY2024?

Religion$2.2BPhilanthropy$1.3BEducation$1.1BInternational$795MHuman Services$541MYouth Development$298MHealth$206MCivil Rights$152MCommunity Improvement$120MOther$3.7B

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

scadmyositiscemeterysafety officerscore values-ourlamplighterdance salad

2019

akhabcicamolamaradrianswmjudge fite

2020

aphasiagrabcside committedmaintain earlychurch guatemalavalleywise healthscioto

2021

eskimo dogslifespring pregnancymnpvasannehcindis hopechtforefront living

2022

divestedinterclean energycedar lakeaid ukrainehealth advocateumass

2023

beth israelnebhlahey healthswimrvanaclarmenian studieswaterkeeper

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 16327 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k2848 grants · $20M
$10k–50k8284 grants · $179M
$50k–250k3765 grants · $385M
$250k+1430 grants · $2.0B

$24,402

Median grant

States reached

$6.1B

Total assets

Largest grants

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF FREMONT$53,981,469
LIFESHAPE INC$46,139,846
JACKSON HOLE CLASSICAL ACADEMY$43,007,500
WATERSTONE (CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC)$38,240,439
IMPACT FOUNDATION (IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION)$31,745,709
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$30,996,269
JBM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC$28,000,000
TRUSTBRIDGE GLOBAL (INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST)$27,881,810
MUSEUM OF THE BIBLE$25,718,148
ACE SCHOLARSHIPS (ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION)$23,729,900
YOUNG LIFE NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS$23,054,548
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM (VANGUARD CHARITABLE)$23,054,104
GIVECLEAR FOUNDATION$20,921,454
MISSION MUTUAL$19,429,962
CRU (CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST)$17,948,300

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $213.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 10%. 41% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10.2B · 1944 repeat orgs$207M to everyone else

1944 repeat relationships — 1695 still active in FY2024, 249 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1944

Total granted

$10.2B

$109M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%

+74%

Still filing today

69%

59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TS
THE SIGNATRY
8× · 2017–2024 · $354M · revenue +9767%
IF
IMPACT FOUNDATION (IMPACT INVESTING CHARITABLE FOUNDATION)
8× · 2017–2024 · $197M · revenue +921% · 60% of their budget
YS
YOUNGLIVES SOUTH PORTLAND (YOUNG LIFE)
8× · 2017–2024 · $155M · revenue +26%

Funded once

IF
IFE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $20M · revenue +546%
TS
THE SOLOMON FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $15M
C1
CHECK 1002 CHARITABLE TRUST
one grant, 2022 · $14M · revenue -97% · 99% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—

Christian Mission for the United Nations

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—

PrayerMentor

Empowering Christian leaders to pray for the harvest

Religion

Christian Ministries International

—

Peacemaker Ministries

To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically.

International

Grace Global Ministries Inc

Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.

International

Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evangelism, disciple-making, and church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities around the world, starting in North America.

Religion

CrossTalk Global

CrossTalk Global is a Christian educational organization that empowers and trains global church leaders to effectively communicate the Scriptures and share the hope of Christ in their communities. These projects are carried out in the USA…

Religion

Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

Ambassadors of Reconciliation

International ministry providing christian conflict coaching, counseling, mediation, arbitration, church intervention, teaching & leadership training

Human Services

Ason International Inc

Assisting national Christian leaders around the world.

Human Services

International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is TRUTH78 and the most unlike its peers is Asbury College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%742/39,630

the rest of the field

12%

205,427/1,779,935

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

1432 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

546

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

639

Early backer (in before they grew)

1387/1432

Grantees still filing

1109/1432

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,176,360,306Religion$2,172,734,307Philanthropy$1,296,720,452Education$1,119,516,278International$794,592,460Human Services$541,377,809Youth Development$297,523,128

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

G II CharitiesMI22.3× affinity124 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: G II Charities · First Fruit Inc · Henry P and Susan C Crowell Trust · Finishing Fund Management · Summit Foundation · Gordon Christian Trust · The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust · Edgar and Elsa Prince Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Richard and Helen Devos Foundation · Stewardship Foundation · Domanada Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

20get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: JBM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

high risk

~2 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 14.7× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 811805367 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on JBM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc?

Find your warmest path to Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines