Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

A3

A3 (California) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,436,447 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($2,755,733). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$3.3M
Funders on record
17
Grants received
$6.4M
Net assets
$2.7M
13/17 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 25%
01What it does

What A3 does

Mission

A3 changes the few who change the many. We equip and unify visionary christ-centered leaders to influence spirit-led change. We are a vibrant community accelerating christ-centered movements around the world. A3 nurtures intentional learning communities to build and sustain christ's leaders around the world. We are a leader development group the accelerates the capacity of leaders through a deep learning community, so they experience change from the inside out and hopefully make a significant kingdom impact.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Leader development: A3 is a vibrant community that develops leaders. Our community is committed to life-long development: being developed personally and developing other leaders. We strive to develop: (1) more christ-like pastors to lead the church with vision,character and competence; (2) pastors who are better equipped to lead their congregations in countries where christians are persecuted;(3) church leaders who are less likely to drop out of ministry due to burnout or moral failure; and (4) leaders with the vision to multiply faith communities that will transform lives.

    $2,274,121 spentof which $57,429 as grants
    85% of program spending
  2. Church multiplication & evangelism: A3 is a vibrant community that seeks to multiply. We are committed to reproduction on all levels: (1) personal multiplication - we are leaders serving leaders; (2) leaders and disciples - develop leaders who reproduce themselves in others - leaders who can multiply disciples; and (3) congregations & churches - we want to develop leaders who multiply churches that impact their communities, reach new believers, and reproduce churches.

    $260,783 spentof which $58,220 as grants$48,630 earned by the program
    10% of program spending
  3. The lausanne movement: the lausanne movement is a worldwide movement that mobilizes evangelical leaders to collaborate for world evangelization. A3 provides staff support to assist in this mission as lausanne coordinates regional consultations to discuss issues facing the church and to foster collaboration among christian denominations and organizations.

    $128,205 spent
    5% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,663,109.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($4.0M) Expenses 100 ($3.6M) Net assets 100 ($2.5M)2019 Revenue 73 ($2.9M) Expenses 101 ($3.7M) Net assets 71 ($1.8M)2020 Revenue 74 ($2.9M) Expenses 85 ($3.1M) Net assets 65 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 71 ($2.8M) Expenses 70 ($2.5M) Net assets 79 ($2.0M)2022 Revenue 72 ($2.9M) Expenses 78 ($2.8M) Net assets 80 ($2.0M)2023 Revenue 92 ($3.7M) Expenses 81 ($2.9M) Net assets 110 ($2.8M)2024 Revenue 85 ($3.4M) Expenses 93 ($3.3M) Net assets 112 ($2.8M)2025 Revenue 83 ($3.3M) Expenses 94 ($3.4M) Net assets 108 ($2.7M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (83)Expenses (94)Net assets (108)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $2.2M to $3.0M (+33%).

$2.7M
$2.0M
$2.1M
$2.5M
$2.2M
$3.0M
$3.0M
$2.9M
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 9% · 2022 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of A3’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (90% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,735 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$389k
’18
−$736k
’19
−$135k
’20
$331k
’21
$42k
’22
$757k
’23
$38k
’24
−$85k
’25
7.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed2021211514151621
Joined·+3+1+1+1+2+3+7
No longer listed·2172122
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $322k → $779k.

10 of 17 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 92% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of A3’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

A3 leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 82%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

97% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund A3.

43%
largest funder
82%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 43% · 2018 80% · 2019 50% · 2020 53% · 2021 42% · 2022 47% · 2023 60% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

69% of A3's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 76% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

92% of A3's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $505k that is directly attributable, 93% of it comes from funders outside California, across 6 states.

IL
MI
CA
NE
TN
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5.9M arriving through sponsors registered in 10 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

A3 is better cushioned than half of the 1,211 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve7.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,211 religion nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like A3

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 10%Fundraising 12%

Governance

11
board members
82%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

84%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for A3: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds A3?
A3 (California) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,436,447 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($2,755,733). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 92% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does A3 have?
IRS filings report 17 organizations giving $6,436,447 in grants to A3, 13 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of A3?
NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,755,733 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like A3 find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 17 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing