· Public charity
Finishing Fund Management
The finishing fund is accelerating the completion of the great commission by financing the effort to take the gospel to the people groups and places where it has never been heard.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $124k
- $50k–250k11 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+7 grants · $3.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE | $824,385 |
| E3 PARTNERS | $582,500 |
| NEW COVENANT MISSION | $578,560 |
| OBEDIENCE | $529,103 |
| CITY FOR THE NATIONS | $517,230 |
| INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST | $469,934 |
| FRIENDS OF AGAPE | $343,013 |
| CHRISTIAN AID MISSION | $202,800 |
| ENGAGING NATIONS A PRIORITY LIVING MINISTRY | $169,431 |
| TEAM EXPANSION EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES | $166,084 |
| IMPACT INDONESIA | $150,300 |
| GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP | $150,000 |
| EAST-WEST MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL | $138,000 |
| WIN LIFE | $120,000 |
| HARVESTERS | $110,375 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC6× · 2019–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +134%
- EPE3 Partners Ministry6× · 2019–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +18%
- RUReaching Unreached Nations Inc3× · 2019–2021 · $1.7M · revenue +33%
Funded once
- IIIssachar Initiativeone grant, 2019 · $230k
- SVSADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $210k
- UunfoldingWordone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.
The purpose of IMI is reaching nationals through nationals in ministry.
Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.
Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.
The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…
To join in the completion of the Great Commission through Scripture Engagement in all languages and every people group.
Engaged in missionary training, organizing churches, evangelism, and related Christian activities.
Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Nations International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love Counts Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC ↗
- Who funds E3 Partners Ministry ↗
- Who funds Reaching Unreached Nations Inc ↗
- Who funds MINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Global Catalytic Network ↗
- Who funds Friends of Agape ↗
- Who funds IMPACT INDONESIA INC ↗
- Who funds By The Spirit Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST ↗
- Who funds HARVESTERS MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds PRIORITY LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of India Network ↗
- Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
- Who funds WE IGNITE NATIONS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN RESPONSE USA ↗
- Who funds Issachar Initiative ↗
- Who funds Renew World Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds CUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP ↗
- Who funds DEAFWAY GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds AFRICANS REACHING AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds unfoldingWord ↗
- Who funds ActBeyond ↗
- Who funds GTI HOPE ↗
- Who funds Epic International Corporation ↗
- Who funds Givers Legacy Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HORN OF AFRICA MISSION ↗
- Who funds BIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE COUNTS NOW ↗
- Who funds PROJECT42 ↗
- Who funds DISCIPLEMAKERS INC ↗
- Who funds ALL NATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Project42 · Tyndale House Ministries · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bolick Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · American Bible Society · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Finishing Fund Management funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Finishing Fund Management?
Find your warmest path to Finishing Fund Management through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.