Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Finishing Fund Management

The finishing fund is accelerating the completion of the great commission by financing the effort to take the gospel to the people groups and places where it has never been heard.

$5.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$824k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Religion$14MInternational$3.0MHuman Services$389kPublic Safety & Disaster$331kPhilanthropy$72k
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.5M
  • $250k+7 grants · $3.8M
$150,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$974k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE$824,385
E3 PARTNERS$582,500
NEW COVENANT MISSION$578,560
OBEDIENCE$529,103
CITY FOR THE NATIONS$517,230
INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST$469,934
FRIENDS OF AGAPE$343,013
CHRISTIAN AID MISSION$202,800
ENGAGING NATIONS A PRIORITY LIVING MINISTRY$169,431
TEAM EXPANSION EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES$166,084
IMPACT INDONESIA$150,300
GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP$150,000
EAST-WEST MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$138,000
WIN LIFE$120,000
HARVESTERS$110,375
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%IMPACT INDONESIA: $178k → 10%FRIENDS OF INDIA NETWORK: $117k → 12%DEAF PATHWAY GLOBAL: $47k → 4%WIN LIFE: $120k → 7%IMPACT INDONESIA: $172k → 10%Friends of India Network: $107k → 12%Deaf Pathway Global: $47k → 4%Win Life: $120k → 7%IMPACT INDONESIA: $150k → 10%FRIENDS OF INDIA NETWORK: $100k → 12%DEAF PATHWAY GLOBAL: $19k → 4%IMPACT INDONESIA: $95k → 10%IMPACT INDONESIA: $65k → 10%Impact Indonesia: $51k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
IN
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
DE
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 30 repeat orgs$891k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
9

Total granted

$16M
$729k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+12%

Still filing today

70%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalEducationPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +134%
  • EP
    E3 Partners Ministry
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +18%
  • RU
    Reaching Unreached Nations Inc
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.7M · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • II
    Issachar Initiative
    one grant, 2019 · $230k
  • SV
    SADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $210k
  • U
    unfoldingWord
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global City Missions Initiative Incorporated

Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…

Religion
2
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
3
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

4
Indigenous Ministries International Inc

The purpose of IMI is reaching nationals through nationals in ministry.

Religion
5
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
6
Grace Global Ministries Inc

Grace Global Ministries exists to assist local churches in sending global workers to fulfill the Great Commission.

International
7
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
8
InitiativeGlobal

To join in the completion of the Great Commission through Scripture Engagement in all languages and every people group.

Religion
9
World Indigenous Missions Inc

Engaged in missionary training, organizing churches, evangelism, and related Christian activities.

Religion
10
Across Nations

Across nations is dedicated to spreading the gospel through establishing, developing and promoting all aspects of church ministry.

Religion
11
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
12
Churches in Missions Inc

Mobilization of churches in America by taking pastors and laymen on vision and service trips overseas in fulfillment of Jesus command to go ye into all the world, making disciples...

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Nations International Inc and the most unlike its peers is Love Counts Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%39%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/45
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,520

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/35
Grantees still filing
26/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

E3 Partners Ministry — $1,815,886 · ReligionE3 Partners MinistryReaching Unreached Nations Inc — $1,715,000 · ReligionReaching Unreached Nations IncMINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL — $1,019,212 · ReligionMINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONALTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC — $934,385 · ReligionTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INCFriends of Agape — $803,013 · ReligionFriends of AgapeBy The Spirit Ministries Inc — $689,640 · ReligionBy The Spirit Ministries IncGLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC — $654,120 · ReligionGLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INCINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST — $579,170 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUSTHARVESTERS MINISTRIES — $420,300 · ReligionPRIORITY LIVING INC — $371,413 · Religion+12 more — $1,593,618 · Religion+12 moreTEAM EXPANSION MINISTRIES INC — $1,537,834 · OtherTEAM EXPANSION M…CHRISTIAN AID MISSION — $397,800 · OtherCHRISTIAN AID MI…SADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH — $210,000 · OtherSADDLEBACK VALLE…AFRICA INLAND MISSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED — $191,418 · OtherAFRICA INLAND MI…+8 more — $321,153 · Other+8 moreNEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC — $1,896,572 · InternationalNEW COVENANT…AFRICANS REACHING AFRICA INC — $112,600 · InternationalAFRICANS REA…IMPACT INDONESIA INC — $710,350 · Human ServicesFriends of India Network — $325,000 · Human ServicesWE IGNITE NATIONS — $240,000 · Human ServicesDEAFWAY GLOBAL — $113,750 · Human ServicesGlobal Catalytic Network — $860,423 · Public Safety & DisasterGTI HOPE — $88,750 · EducationGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $5,871 · EducationGivers Legacy Foundation Inc — $71,975 · PhilanthropyBIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $61,080 · Recreation & Sports
Religion$10,595,757Other$2,658,205International$2,009,172Human Services$1,389,100Public Safety & Disaster$860,423Education$94,621Philanthropy$71,975Recreation & Sports$61,080

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW COVENANT MISSIONS INC — $1,896,572 over 6y, 25% of budgetE3 Partners Ministry — $1,815,886 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetReaching Unreached Nations Inc — $1,715,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetMINORITIES FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL — $1,019,212 over 4y, 30% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC — $934,385 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGlobal Catalytic Network — $860,423 over 3y, 31% of budgetFriends of Agape — $803,013 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetIMPACT INDONESIA INC — $710,350 over 6y, 23% of budgetBy The Spirit Ministries Inc — $689,640 over 2y, 35% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST — $579,170 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHARVESTERS MINISTRIES — $420,300 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetPRIORITY LIVING INC — $371,413 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetFriends of India Network — $325,000 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetWE IGNITE NATIONS — $240,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN RESPONSE USA — $240,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCUSH EMPOWERMENT GROUP — $174,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetDEAFWAY GLOBAL — $113,750 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetAFRICANS REACHING AFRICA INC — $112,600 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetunfoldingWord — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGTI HOPE — $88,750 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetEpic International Corporation — $82,675 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetGivers Legacy Foundation Inc — $71,975 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHORN OF AFRICA MISSION — $70,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBIGLIFE INTERNATIONAL INC — $61,080 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetPROJECT42 — $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetDISCIPLEMAKERS INC — $48,712 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetALL NATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC — $40,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetREACHING INDIANS MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC — $30,333 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetGLOBAL SERVICE NETWORK INC — $5,871 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS36.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Project42 · Tyndale House Ministries · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bolick Foundation · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · American Bible Society · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Finishing Fund Management funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Finishing Fund Management?

    Find your warmest path to Finishing Fund Management through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph