· Private foundation
Prairie Creek Partners Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $356k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $625k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FAMILY LEGACY MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL | $100,240 |
| OURCALLING INC | $100,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE | $75,000 |
| FOR THE NATIONS REFUGEE OUTREACH | $50,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION OF DALLAS | $50,000 |
| ESPERANZA MINISTRIES DBA CASA DEL LAGO | $50,000 |
| EXILE INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION (ACT) | $50,000 |
| HOPE INTERNATIONAL | $50,000 |
| HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| VOICE OF HOPE | $45,000 |
| CANYON PATHWAYS | $30,000 |
| SEMILLA NUEVA | $30,000 |
| ELAM | $25,000 |
| TEXAS BAPTIST MEN INC DBA TEXANS ON MISSION | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $223k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION8× · 2017–2024 · $628k · revenue +72%
- BEBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $415k · revenue +70%
- SPSAMARITAN'S PURSE6× · 2017–2024 · $317k · revenue +134%
Funded once
- IGINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $100k
- IJINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue +82%
- SCSEED COMPANY INCone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.
As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.
With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
To equip and assist christians and their churches to respond to conflict biblically.
Biglife international inc. empowers believers worldwide to reach and disciple their own people for jesus christ.
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.
Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Both Ends Believing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Embers International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR COMMUNITY TRANSFORMATION ↗
- Who funds BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Family Legacy Missions International ↗
- Who funds OURCALLING INC ↗
- Who funds EXILE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds HOPE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds PUREHOPE COALITION ↗
- Who funds BOTH ENDS BELIEVING INC ↗
- Who funds BRAVELOVE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds For the Nations Refugee Outreach ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Canyon Pathways ↗
- Who funds RAMESH RICHARD EVANGELISM AND CHURCH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Living Water International ↗
- Who funds MERCY STREET ↗
- Who funds R O D MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SKY RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds Park Cities Presbyterian Church Foundation ↗
- Who funds AXIS ↗
- Who funds Voice of Hope Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds BRAZOS PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Servant Foundation · Denman Family Foundation · Dallas Seminary Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Hillcrest Foundation · The Independent Charitable Gift Fund · Kershaw Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Prairie Creek Partners Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Prairie Creek Partners Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Prairie Creek Partners Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.