Skip to content

Indiana · Nonprofit

MISSION TO UKRAINE INC

MISSION TO UKRAINE INC (Indiana) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,790,696 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($5,905,476). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 87% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$3.5M
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$7.8M
Net assets
$712k
11/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 63%
01What it does

What Mission to Ukraine Inc does

Mission

Our mission is to show the compassionate love of christ by serving children with disabilities and women facing unplanned pregnancies, transforming their lives and the lives of those around them.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Mission to ukraine provides services for children with disabilities and their families via in person or virtual appointments. Services include occupational therapy, physical therapy, sensor therapy, medical and dental services, social integration programs, special eduction preschool classes, schoold integration and readiness classes, and more. Each child's treatment is beased upon their individual care plan.

  2. As if often explained by christian theologians, the local church is god's plan for restoring his perople and fighting sustems of injustice. The funds provided for this purpose support ukrainian churches' efforts to impact the lives of communities in remote villages, provide christian outreach materials, offer after-school feeding programs, and help with church facility improvements.

    $296,900 spentof which $296,900 as grants
    8% of program spending
  3. Since 1997, mission to ukraine has helped mothers in crisis, and society as a whole, navigate unplanned pregnancies and realize the value of human life. All families impacted by dangerous or unplanned pregnancies received medical and dental services through mtu's onsite clinic, as approporiate, and free of charge. Hundreds of families received monthly humanitarian aid packages. Thousands of students, teachers, and community leaders participated in risky behaviors seminars learning about abstinence and sexuality, hiv/aids, ssts, substance abuse, alcoholism, and other high risk choices.

    $26,450 spentof which $26,450 as grants
    1% of program spending
  4. Mtu is using funds from a capital campaign to construct a building to help ukrainians have a central location to receive the support that mtu provides.

    $3,384,912 spentof which $3,305,285 as grants$32,599 earned by the program
    91% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,708,262.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($822k) Net assets 100 ($773k)2018 Revenue 75 ($964k) Expenses 132 ($1.1M) Net assets 84 ($649k)2021 Revenue 136 ($1.7M) Expenses 240 ($2.0M) Net assets 54 ($416k)2022 Revenue 172 ($2.2M) Expenses 191 ($1.6M) Net assets 136 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 230 ($2.9M) Expenses 346 ($2.8M) Net assets 149 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 274 ($3.5M) Expenses 482 ($4.0M) Net assets 92 ($712k)
201720182021202220232024
Revenue (274)Expenses (482)Net assets (92)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $418k to $1.1M (+153%).

$788k
$649k
$418k
$1.1M
$1.2M
$715k
201720182021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 1% · 2022 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of MISSION TO UKRAINE INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,352 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$460k
’17
−$123k
’18
−$225k
’21
$637k
’22
$101k
’23
−$441k
’24
0.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

201720182021202220232024
Listed11141213119
Joined·+3·+4+3+0
No longer listed·0·352
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 4 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $814k → $1.6M.

9 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 87% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MISSION TO UKRAINE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MISSION TO UKRAINE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 76% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MISSION TO UKRAINE INC.

76%
largest funder
92%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 86% · 2018 92% · 2019 80% · 2020 70% · 2021 68% · 2022 57% · 2023 87% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

64% of MISSION TO UKRAINE INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

87% of MISSION TO UKRAINE INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.0M that is directly attributable, 91% of it comes from Indiana funders.

MN
NY
IN
PA
TN
NC
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Indiana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $6.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MISSION TO UKRAINE INC has grown faster than half of the 11,752 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−13% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.9mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,752 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like MISSION TO UKRAINE INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Indiana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 4%Fundraising 2%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSION TO UKRAINE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MISSION TO UKRAINE INC?
MISSION TO UKRAINE INC (Indiana) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $7,790,696 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($5,905,476). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 87% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MISSION TO UKRAINE INC have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $7,790,696 in grants to MISSION TO UKRAINE INC, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MISSION TO UKRAINE INC?
NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $5,905,476 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MISSION TO UKRAINE INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Indiana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mission to Ukraine →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing