Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

San Francisco Architectural Heritage

San Francisco Architectural Heritage (California) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,345,148 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($341,482). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.0M
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$1.3M
Net assets
$14M
11/24 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 35%
01What it does

What San Francisco Architectural Heritage does

Mission

The Organizations primary impact is to preserve and enhance San Franciscos unique architectural and cultural identity.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. SF Heritage owns and maintains an 1886 Queen Anne Victorian house and museum open two days a week and by appointment to groups guided by docents

    $186,111 spent$120,628 earned by the program
    25% of program spending
  2. Heritage advocates urban conservation in the public-decision making process by monitoring projects and policies that affect historic and cultural resources at the San Francisco Planning Commission Historic Preservation Commission and the Board of Supervisors and by providing a forum for public awareness. Other Educational programs include walking tours of San Francisco special tours and lectures about its architectural history legacy businesses and cultural history. SF Heritage monitors 59 preservation easements ensuring the facades of historically structures are maintained in perpetuity.

    $339,653 spentof which $110,414 as grants$3,779,625 earned by the program
    46% of program spending
  3. SF Heritage owns the Doolan Larson building and storefronts located at the corner of Haight and Ashbury. The Doolan Larson building serves as a center for the interpretation and preservation of Haight-Ashburys many contributions to Americas countercultural legacy and hosts periodic artist residencies.

    $209,760 spent$222,128 earned by the program
    29% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $735,524.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($689k) Expenses 100 ($744k) Net assets 100 ($4.5M)2018 Revenue 1079 ($7.4M) Expenses 142 ($1.1M) Net assets 239 ($11M)2019 Revenue 171 ($1.2M) Expenses 142 ($1.1M) Net assets 244 ($11M)2020 Revenue 161 ($1.1M) Expenses 161 ($1.2M) Net assets 242 ($11M)2021 Revenue 187 ($1.3M) Expenses 132 ($980k) Net assets 252 ($11M)2022 Revenue 174 ($1.2M) Expenses 178 ($1.3M) Net assets 243 ($11M)2023 Revenue 154 ($1.1M) Expenses 145 ($1.1M) Net assets 242 ($11M)2024 Revenue 124 ($852k) Expenses 113 ($840k) Net assets 248 ($11M)2025 Revenue 582 ($4.0M) Expenses 177 ($1.3M) Net assets 315 ($14M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (582)Expenses (177)Net assets (315)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $4.8M to $11M (+129%).

$4.8M
$11M
$11M
$11M
$12M
$11M
$11M
$11M
$14M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 8% · 2018 1% · 2019 2% · 2020 9% · 2021 46% · 2022 40% · 2023 20% · 2024 5% · 2025 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of San Francisco Architectural Heritage’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (63% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 5,377 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$56k
’17
$6.4M
’18
$122k
’19
−$96k
’20
$308k
’21
−$127k
’22
−$13k
’23
$12k
’24
$2.7M
’25
10
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Stephen Labounty

President CEO

Board chair

Elisa Skaggs

Chair of the Board

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021, and between the FY2021 and FY2022, and between the FY2022 and FY2023, and between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed181816151713201819
Joined·+0+2+3+3+2+8+5+1
No longer listed·04416170
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 9 funders to 6 funders, grant income fell $242k → $66k.

5 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of San Francisco Architectural Heritage’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

San Francisco Architectural Heritage has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

71% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund San Francisco Architectural Heritage.

25%
largest funder
52%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 27% · 2018 29% · 2019 59% · 2020 34% · 2021 36% · 2022 38% · 2023 39% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of San Francisco Architectural Heritage's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 46% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

69% of San Francisco Architectural Heritage's grant income comes from California funders.

WA
CA
MO
DE
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $645k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

San Francisco Architectural Heritage runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 3,230 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin67% · top quartile
Months of reserve10.0mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)25% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,230 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding San Francisco Architectural Heritage receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $8k on record.

Federal$8k
grants $8kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of the Interior$8k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like San Francisco Architectural Heritage

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

56% of spending goes to programs.

Program 56%Management 28%Fundraising 16%

Governance

18
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

93%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for San Francisco Architectural Heritage: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds San Francisco Architectural Heritage?
San Francisco Architectural Heritage (California) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,345,148 to it, the largest being DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ($341,482). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does San Francisco Architectural Heritage have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $1,345,148 in grants to San Francisco Architectural Heritage, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of San Francisco Architectural Heritage?
DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC is the largest funder on record, with $341,482 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like San Francisco Architectural Heritage find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing