· Public charity
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc
United way of metro chicago brings together and activates people, resources, and expertise to improve outcomes for individuals, families, and communities.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 331 grants below total $22,795,927 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $28,397,762 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,601,835 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k110 grants · $660k
- $10k–50k145 grants · $3.7M
- $50k–250k54 grants · $4.3M
- $250k+22 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES | $2,038,325 |
| BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL | $1,322,556 |
| RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER | $1,050,471 |
| URBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC | $1,000,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF CHICAGO | $786,602 |
| RAND CORPORATION | $639,543 |
| CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $630,886 |
| AUSTIN COMING TOGETHER | $623,953 |
| LATINOS PROGRESANDO | $573,063 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO | $559,660 |
| GREATER AUBURN GRESHAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $538,500 |
| OAI INC | $514,588 |
| EVANSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $509,000 |
| TEAMWORK ENGLEWOOD | $485,000 |
| CLARETIAN ASSOCIATES INC | $440,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $49.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
480 repeat relationships — 214 still active in FY2025, 266 since wound down; 115 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MFMetropolitan Family Services9× · 2017–2025 · $16M · revenue +332%
- ACAustin Coming Together8× · 2017–2025 · $9.3M · revenue +256% · 63% of their budget
- CCCatholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago9× · 2017–2025 · $7.8M · revenue +4%
Funded once
- CCCHICAGO CONNECTEDone grant, 2021 · $9.7M
- HHIRE360graduatedone grant, 2023 · $1.4M · revenue +46%
- SASalvation Army Metropolitan Chicagoone grant, 2017 · $726k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
Chicago Cares, Inc. mobilizes volunteers to build a stronger, more unified Chicago.
To achieve parity in economic opportunity for people of color by advancing multiracial leadership in corporate governance, expanding the talent pipline for executive-level management, and growing minority businesses.
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
Chicago Workers' Collaborative's mission is to promote full employment and equality for the lowest wage-earners, primarily temporary staffing workers, in the Chicago region through leadership and skills training, critical assistance and…
Chicago Jobs Council (CJC) pursues its mission through advocacy, applied research, public education and capacity-building initiatives focused on influencing the development or reform of public policies and programs. From 18 original…
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dbc Gifts of Love Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
828 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 828 of the 949 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
- Who funds Austin Coming Together ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Latinos Progresando ↗
- Who funds GREATER AUBURN GRESHAM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds The YMCA of Metropolitan Chicago ↗
- Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT STAR COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORP ↗
- Who funds Evanston Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY - MCCORMICK PARTNERSHIP FOR STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CROSSROADS INC ↗
- Who funds YWCA METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION NFP ↗
- Who funds Chicago Federation of Labor Workforce and Community Initiative ↗
- Who funds YWCA EvanstonNorth Shore ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds FII - NATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Enlace Chicago ↗
- Who funds HIRE360 ↗
- Who funds RESTORATION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds OAI Inc ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH COMMUNITY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF JOLIET ↗
- Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds URBAN GROWERS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER RESOURCES FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING ↗
- Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights ↗
- Who funds PHALANX FAMILY SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Chicago Foundation for Women · Circle of Service Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · Forefront · Michael Reese Health Trust · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · Healthy Communities Foundation · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.