· Private foundation
George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k129 grants · $547k
- $10k–50k15 grants · $270k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $323k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAYO CLINIC | $1,275,000 |
| ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO | $530,000 |
| NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FOR FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT | $520,000 |
| REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO | $500,000 |
| MISERICORDIA HOME | $180,000 |
| NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION | $143,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SPRINGFIELD IN ILLINOIS INC | $30,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF ROCHESTER MN INC | $25,000 |
| 360 YOUTH SERVICES | $25,000 |
| MARKLUND CHILDREN'S HOME PHILIP CENTER IN BLOOMINGDALE | $25,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA | $25,000 |
| LA RABIDA CHILDRENS HOSPITALITY AND RECREATIONAL CENTER | $20,000 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY OF ROCHSTER MN | $20,000 |
| MARYVILLE ACADEMY THE EISENBERG CAMPUS | $15,000 |
| GIFT OF LIFE INC | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
212 repeat relationships — 129 still active in FY2024, 83 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago5× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +28%- RIRehabilitation Institute of Chicago5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +27%
- MHMISERICORDIA HOME5× · 2020–2024 · $900k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- MCMAYO CLINICone grant, 2020 · $1.0M
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CHIC INCone grant, 2023 · $60k
- LRLA RABIDA CHILDRENS HOSP & REC CNTone grant, 2022 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide residential and rehabilitation services to clients with mental illnesses
Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
Respond now connects those in need with health, hunger, and housing services in the chicago southland.
To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.
Administering an array of critical, intensive therapeutic interventions and/or facilitation services to emotionally and behaviorally disturbed clients for whom DCFS is legally responsible in order to stabilize their traditional or home of…
Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises
House of Good Shepherd serves with love and compassion women and children affected by domestic violence by offering a safe place with opportunities for emotional, educational and spiritual growth, giving hope and continued support for a…
Provide community-based residential housing to adults with autism and/or severe developmental disabilities. also provide developmental training and other supports to this same population.
Providing interim housing for men, women and children, social services, homeless services, emergency shelter, and housing in chicago community for the homeless, poor and disadvantaged.
Provide services in response to individual need
To provide additional supportive housing, social, health, and other human services to the indigent and special needs individuals of chicago's inner city population and transitioning the homeless to a life of self- sufficiency and stability.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
204 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 204 of the 301 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CHICAGOLAND & NW INDIANA ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES MIDWEST MN WI IA ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BEYOND HUNGER ↗
- Who funds Community Health NFP ↗
- Who funds DEBORAH'S PLACE ↗
- Who funds WINGS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds IMD Guest House Foundation ↗
- Who funds COOL MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SISTERHOUSE ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS DUPAGE & THE FOX VALLEY REGION ↗
- Who funds WILL GRUNDY MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Blowitz-Ridgeway Foundation · Andrew and Alice Fischer Charitable Trust · Helen V Brach Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · WP & HB White Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · The a Montgomery Ward Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Visiting Nurse Association of Chicago (Aka) Vna Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · All Chicago Making Homelessness History
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.