· Public charity
Robert R McCormick Foundation
The robert r.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $91k
- $10k–50k107 grants · $2.8M
- $50k–250k75 grants · $7.9M
- $250k+62 grants · $95M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CANTIGNY FOUNDATION | $33,451,760 |
| UNITED WAY-MCCORMICK PARTNERSHIP FOR STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS INC | $8,246,000 |
| NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY | $5,398,000 |
| ENLACE CHICAGO | $4,715,000 |
| METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES | $3,572,000 |
| INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS (INSTITUTO DEL PROGRESO LATINO) | $3,325,000 |
| TEAMWORK ENGLEWOOD | $2,720,000 |
| BIG SHOULDERS FUND | $2,024,208 |
| XCHANGE CHICAGO INC | $2,000,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER - MAIN CAMPUS | $1,500,000 |
| NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION | $1,500,000 |
| LEWIS UNIVERSITY | $1,235,000 |
| BETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION | $1,173,000 |
| NATIONAL MUSEUM OF MEXICAN ART | $1,155,000 |
| BRIGHTPOINT | $1,050,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $32.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
331 repeat relationships — 192 still active in FY2024, 139 since wound down; 57 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCANTIGNY FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2024 · $105M · revenue +101% · 56% of their budget
- UWUNITED WAY - MCCORMICK PARTNERSHIP FOR STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS INC4× · 2020–2024 · $27M · revenue +88% · 100% of their budget
- ECEnlace Chicago5× · 2020–2024 · $14M · revenue +20% · 57% of their budget
Funded once
- VVVocel Viewing our Children as Emerging Leadersgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $610k · revenue +90% · 33% of their budget
- DCDUPAGE COUNTY REGIONAL OFFICE OF EDUCATIONone grant, 2021 · $550k
- CCCHICAGO COALITION TO SAVE OUR MENTAL HEALTH CENTERSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +45% · 90% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.
The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The chicagoland chamber of commerce combines the power of people, with our legacy of leadership and business advocacy, to drive a dynamic economy. we focus on delivering value for our members, making chicagoland a world-class place to live…
To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.
The Partnership for College Completion (PCC) champions policies, practices, and systems that increase college completion and eliminate degree completion disparities for low-income, first generation, and students of color in Illinois…
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
Arise chicago builds partnerships between faith communities and workers to fight workplace injustice through education, organizing, and advocating for public policy changes.
The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids First Chicago for Education and the most unlike its peers is Mexican Cultural Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
532 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 532 of the 596 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CANTIGNY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY - MCCORMICK PARTNERSHIP FOR STRONG NEIGHBORHOODS INC ↗
- Who funds Enlace Chicago ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOOD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds National Louis University ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
- Who funds Teamwork Englewood Inc ↗
- Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
- Who funds Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Rights ↗
- Who funds Carole Robertson Center for Learning ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago Medical Center ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR LATINO PROGRESS ↗
- Who funds LITTLE VILLAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Illinois Action for Children ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO SCHOLARS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO COUNCIL ON GLOBAL AFFAIRS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds LATINO POLICY FORUM ↗
- Who funds Cristo Rey St Martin College Prep ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS PRESS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
- Who funds XCHANGE CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds Injustice Watch NFP ↗
- Who funds BETTER GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL ↗
- Who funds BLOCK CLUB CHICAGO NFP ↗
- Who funds GE CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds New Life Centers of Chicagoland ↗
- Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Circle of Service Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Field Foundation of Illinois · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · Cme Group Foundation · Michael Reese Health Trust · Chicago Foundation for Women · Fulk Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert R McCormick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Icivics Inc — 13% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.