Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Circle of Service Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37M
Granted FY2024still arriving
637
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Health$41MEducation$34MPhilanthropy$24MInternational$13MHuman Services$12MReligion$8.9MArts & Culture$5.9MScience & Tech$5.8MOther$0
02FY2024 · 637 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k172 grants · $406k
  • $10k–50k268 grants · $6.2M
  • $50k–250k168 grants · $17M
  • $250k+29 grants · $14M
$25,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$592M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$1,735,857
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$1,264,883
SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM$776,292
JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK$685,000
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE INC$652,500
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$629,000
METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES$600,000
CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$600,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO$500,000
GASTRO-INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC$469,216
CHILDRENS FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$453,460
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$450,000
JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES$385,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$355,438
CHILDRENS FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$330,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $11.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NETWORK OF JEWISH HUMAN SERVICE AGENCIES INC: $100k → 7%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS ASSOC OF NORTH AMERICA: $125k → 17%JCC ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA: $100k → 17%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%MANO A MANO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $50k → 8%MISERICORDIA HOME: $50k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $56k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $500k → 14%WORKING CREDIT NFP: $120k → 14%WORKING CREDIT NFP: $75k → 14%THE NETWORK ADVOCATING AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $75k → 14%WORKING CREDIT NFP: $55k → 14%WORKING CREDIT NFP: $55k → 14%WORKING CREDIT NFP: $55k → 14%CAROLE ROBERTSON CENTER FOR LEARNING: $120k → 14%CAROLE ROBERTSON CENTER FOR LEARNING: $90k → 14%FACING FORWARD TO END HOMELESSNESS: $60k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $75k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $60k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $178k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO: $100k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $600k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $550k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $550k → 14%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $550k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $445k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $385k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $370k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $295k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS: $125k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS: $100k → 14%CHILDRENS HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILLINOIS: $100k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $75k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $70k → 14%MRELIEF: $100k → 14%JEWISH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $628k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $290k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $150k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $150k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $120k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $120k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $76k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $54k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $52k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $51k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$161M · 558 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

558 repeat relationships — 425 still active in FY2024, 133 since wound down; 101 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

558
235

Total granted

$161M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+15%

Still filing today

92%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Chicago
    5× · 2020–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +52%
  • SH
    SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $6.7M · revenue +37%
  • KC
    Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry
    5× · 2020–2024 · $5.2M · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • CC
    CONQUER CANCER FDN OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
    one grant, 2020 · $245k
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2021 · $125k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BERRIEN COUNTY TRAILS
    one grant, 2022 · $120k · revenue -83% · 26% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
2
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
A Better Chicago

A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.

Human Services
5
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
6
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Arise Chicago

Arise chicago builds partnerships between faith communities and workers to fight workplace injustice through education, organizing, and advocating for public policy changes.

Employment
10
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
11
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
12
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health and Medicine Policy Research Group and the most unlike its peers is Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Environmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Developmental Disabilities …Policy Research and AdvocacyLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Domestic Violence ServicesYouth Development ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportPublic Library OperationsFaith-Based Social ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentAnimal Rescue and ShelterChristian Youth CampsAddiction Recovery ServicesSenior Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsYouth Mentoring ProgramsEquine Therapy ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Youth Development CentersCommunity FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringDance Arts OrganizationsYouth Sports ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportCommunity Arts CentersSchool District FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Food Banks and PantriesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsUnited Way AffiliatesJewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Community College Foundatio…Cancer Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%3%<5yr13%8%5–10yr18%18%10–20yr15%28%20–35yr14%25%35–55yr22%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr15%24%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr22%37%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.3%3/872
the rest of the field
12%
8,888/71,487

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

838 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 838 of the 931 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
157
Early backer (in before they grew)
824/838
Grantees still filing
570/838
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of Chicago — $7,761,243 · EducationUniversity of ChicagoUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $2,586,239 · EducationUniversity of Illinoi…CHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $1,781,845 · EducationCHILDREN FIRST FUND T…DUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,310,200 · EducationNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS — $1,182,034 · EducationTeach for America Inc — $970,000 · Education+30 more — $12,116,799 · Education+30 moreSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM — $6,738,633 · HealthSINAI HEALTH SYSTEMRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $2,736,857 · HealthRehabilitation Inst…CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH FUN…GASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,425,000 · HealthGASTRO INTESTINAL R…CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $1,250,000 · HealthAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc — $1,250,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000,500 · HealthTHE V FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $943,000 · HealthCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY — $915,725 · Health+16 more — $7,174,238 · Health+16 moreCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,392,500 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,824,920 · Other+83 more — $42,996,507 · Other+83 moreJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $8,007,270 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERAT…JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $3,115,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FUNDERS…JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,433,600 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED …ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,532,550 · PhilanthropyST BALDRICK'S …ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,100,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PH…UNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION — $900,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $1,635,180 · Philanthropy+5 moreThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $3,067,500 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,625,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $962,500 · InternationalTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA — $790,000 · InternationalHIAS INC — $553,750 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL INC — $516,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $450,000 · InternationalAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ — $410,000 · International+8 more — $2,362,500 · InternationalMetropolitan Family Services — $2,870,000 · Human ServicesJewish Child and Family Services — $2,128,570 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $1,062,847 · Human ServicesJewish Community Centers of Chicago — $578,530 · Human ServicesWorking Credit NFP — $369,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL — $325,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTOPHER HOUSE — $315,000 · Human Services+7 more — $1,629,993 · Human ServicesKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $5,156,000 · Arts & CultureLatinos Progresando — $602,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $524,422 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC — $398,824 · Arts & CultureALLIANCE FOR MIDDLE EAST PEACE INC — $315,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $1,223,466 · Arts & Culture
Education$27,708,360Health$25,933,953Other$48,213,927Philanthropy$18,723,600International$11,237,250Human Services$9,278,940Arts & Culture$8,220,212

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $8,007,270 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetUniversity of Chicago — $7,761,243 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI HEALTH SYSTEM — $6,738,633 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry — $5,156,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetJEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK — $3,115,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $3,067,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMetropolitan Family Services — $2,870,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago — $2,736,857 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $2,586,239 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO — $2,433,600 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetJewish Child and Family Services — $2,128,570 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $1,781,845 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,625,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC — $1,532,550 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTHE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetCarbon Mapper Inc — $1,500,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION — $1,500,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetGASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $1,425,000 over 5y, 49% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $1,310,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $1,250,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAmerican Association for Cancer Research Inc — $1,250,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetNOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS — $1,182,034 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association — $1,118,530 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC — $1,116,838 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY — $1,062,847 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $1,060,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY — $973,500 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $970,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $962,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSTART EARLY — $950,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $943,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIllinois Action for Children — $925,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY — $915,725 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED STATES ENERGY FOUNDATION — $900,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University — $839,520 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetONEGOAL — $835,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUPSTART BAY AREA — $825,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $818,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $810,330 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA — $790,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCHICAGO CARES INC — $790,000 over 5y, 7.2% of budgetINTERFAITHFAMILYCOM INC — $780,911 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $741,650 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMICHAEL REESE HEALTH TRUST — $725,000 over 5y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds Kenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FUNDERS NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds Metropolitan Family Services ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Child and Family Services ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN FIRST FUND THE CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Carbon Mapper Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GASTRO INTESTINAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Association for Cancer Research Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE NETWORK OF CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALL CHICAGO MAKING HOMELESSNESS HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds START EARLY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Action for Children ↗
  • Who funds CONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arie and Ida Crown Me…Polk Bros Foundation …United Way of Metropo…Robert R McCormick Fo…Lloyd a Fry FoundationJewish Federation of …Chicago Foundation fo…Michael Reese Health …John D and Catherine …Cme Group FoundationThe First Spoke Found…Vivo Foundation
Arie and Ida Crown MemorialIL204.4× affinity155 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Chicago Foundation for Women · Michael Reese Health Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Cme Group Foundation · The First Spoke Foundation · Vivo Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Circle of Service Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
  • Keshet Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Circle of Service Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Circle of Service Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 931 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home