· Private foundation
Field Foundation of Illinois
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $79k
- $10k–50k219 grants · $4.6M
- $50k–250k54 grants · $3.3M
- $250k+5 grants · $2.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS | $1,156,480 |
| UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY | $556,440 |
| SICF SOUTHERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $430,444 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS | $346,135 |
| 10 INDIVIDUALS - DETAILS UPON REQUE | $250,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $200,000 |
| TRUE STAR FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UPRISING THEATER | $100,000 |
| ENRICH CHICAGO | $100,000 |
| THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| ALT SPACE CHICAGO | $100,000 |
| PRISON NEIGHBORHOOD ARTS PROJECT | $75,000 |
| BORDERLESS MAGAZINE NFP | $75,000 |
| ALTERNATIVE NEWSWEEKLY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| DEFINITION THEATRE COMPANY | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
241 repeat relationships — 143 still active in FY2025, 98 since wound down; 113 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YNYWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS2× · 2024–2025 · $2.4M · revenue +0%
- UWUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC2× · 2024–2025 · $711k · revenue +28%
- BMBorderless Magazine NFP5× · 2020–2025 · $360k · revenue +554%
Funded once
- SISouthern Illinois Community Foundationone grant, 2024 · $422k · revenue 0%
- 1I13 INDVIDUALS - DETAIL UPON REQUESTone grant, 2020 · $325k
- 1I10 INDIVIDUALS - DETAILS UPON REQUESTone grant, 2024 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Cinema/Chicago, the non-profit 501(c)(3) presenting organization of the Chicago International Film Festival, enriches the community through year-round programming devoted to international and independent cinema. We strengthen communication…
To promote public appreciation, understanding and support of the humanities through festivals and educational programs.
Live Free Illinois is a statewide organization partnering with over 120 congregations and directly impacted individuals to build safer more equitable communities across Illinois. Operating at the intersection of criminal justice reform and…
The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.
Chicago public art group brings artists and communities together to produce high-quality public art, extending and transforming the tradition of collaborative, community-involved public artwork.
To cultivate a growing international culture of listening.
Operation of studio space and facilities for community radio station. The station is intended to benefit thousands of listeners and various music and arts appreciation groups throughout the chicago area.
Presenting free high-quality classical music performances and music education experiences in the Chicago metropolitan area for people of all ages and degrees of musical awareness so they can experience how music enriches life.
The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…
To advocate for the dance field and strengthen a diverse range of dance organizations and artists through services and programs that build and engage audiences.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Access Living of Metropolitan Chicago and the most unlike its peers is The Green Lantern Gallery and Press Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
427 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 427 of the 658 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YWCA NORTHWESTERN ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CHAMPAIGN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Illinois Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds Borderless Magazine NFP ↗
- Who funds TRUE STAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC NARRATIVE ↗
- Who funds ALT SPACE CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds Chicago United for Equity ↗
- Who funds Southside Together Organizing For Power ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND ↗
- Who funds Invisible Institute ↗
- Who funds THE HANA CENTER ↗
- Who funds BLOCK CLUB CHICAGO NFP ↗
- Who funds DEFINITION THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT ON RACE & EQUITY ↗
- Who funds SOUTH SIDE WEEKLY NFP ↗
- Who funds Sisters in Cinema NFP ↗
- Who funds South Side Community Art Center ↗
- Who funds Organized Communities Against Deportations ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC MEDIA INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Chicago Torture Justice Center ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER ↗
- Who funds GICHIGAMIIN INDIGENOUS NATIONS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Arab American Action Network ↗
- Who funds Healing to Action ↗
- Who funds READER INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY JOURNALISM INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - CHICAGO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Joyce Foundation · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Crossroads Fund Inc · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Walder Foundation · Robert R McCormick Foundation · Woods Fund of Chicago · Chicago Foundation for Women · Illinois Humanities Council Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Field Foundation of Illinois funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.