· Private foundation
Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k138 grants · $705k
- $10k–50k131 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THEATRE WASHINGTON | $30,000 |
| THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC | $25,000 |
| RED CLOUD INDIAN SCHOOL INC | $20,000 |
| CENTER FOR NONPROFIT ADVANCEMENT | $20,000 |
| ELEPHANT AID INTERNATIONAL | $20,000 |
| FABSCRAP INC | $20,000 |
| MIL MILAGROS INC | $20,000 |
| SAVE A CHILD'S HEART US | $20,000 |
| GALA INC | $20,000 |
| ASHEVILLE SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC | $20,000 |
| SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| BEATS RHYMES AND LIFE | $20,000 |
| WILLIAM & MARY FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| THE SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS PARKLANDS ASSOCIATION | $20,000 |
| SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
258 repeat relationships — 163 still active in FY2022, 95 since wound down; 106 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTHEATREWASHINGTON4× · 2019–2022 · $115k · revenue +78%
- TNTHE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC4× · 2019–2022 · $100k · revenue +1%
- BEBerkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane4× · 2019–2022 · $73k · revenue +178%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN OF HAITIone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +11%
- TRTEAM RUBICON INCone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -17%
- FNFORTERRA NWone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -18%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.
Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
Disability rights washington's mission is to advance the dignity, equality, and self determination of people with disabilities. we work to pursue justice on matters related to human and legal rights.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.
The natural areas conservancy champions urban natural areas in new york city and across the nation through innovative research, partnerships, and advocacy. we increase the health and resilience of urban forests and wetlands, catalyze…
The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.
Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.
The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.
To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.
The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is My Sisters Place Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hadley Luzerne Public Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
656 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 656 of the 756 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THEATREWASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds THE NEWS LITERACY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds SIBLEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Berkeley East Bay Humane Society Inc dba Berkeley Humane ↗
- Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
- Who funds NUYA INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SHAKESPEARE THEATRE ↗
- Who funds AIDS LEGAL REFERRAL PANEL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds CANINE PARTNERS OF THE ROCKIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMPERSAND FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds BOULDER EMERGENCY SQUAD INC ↗
- Who funds NORMAN ROCKWELL MUSEUM AT STOCKBRIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LES BALLETS TROCKADERO DE MONTE CARLO INC ↗
- Who funds The Ivymount School Inc ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER PUBLICPRIVATE MEMBERSHIP FUND FOR AGING SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHATHAM ORPHEUM THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FEDERATION OF ANIMAL SANCTUARIES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds The Lift Garage ↗
- Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds The Writers Center ↗
- Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
- Who funds TAKING IT TO THE STREETS WITH LORI AND SHIRA ↗
- Who funds Holocaust Center For Humanity ↗
- Who funds LEVINE MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds CHATHAM HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BISHOP MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND NATURE INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON FREE CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BALLET TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Nora Roberts Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Venable Foundation Inc · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Corina Higginson Trust Co Laura Ford Trustee · Humanities Council of Washington DC
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Pride of Baltimore Inc — 30% of income from government
- Center for Coastal Studies Inc — 26% of income from government
- Asbury Park Music Foundation Inc — 9% of income from government
- Worcester Natural History Society Inc — 8% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Evergreen Heritage Center Foundatio — 6% of income from government
- The Writers Center — 6% of income from government
- Cape Cod Commercial Fishermen's Alliance Inc — 5% of income from government
- Chase Brexton Health Services Inc — 4% of income from government
- Old Sturbridge Inc — 4% of income from government
- Whale and Dolphin Conservationinc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bishop Museum of Science and Nature Inc — 2% of income from government
- Arts for the Aging Inc — 2% of income from government
- Adventure Theatre Inc — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Norman Rockwell Museum at Stockbridge Inc — 1% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- Chatham Historical Society Inc — 0% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Gulfshore Playhouse Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- Adoptions Together Inc Dba As Paths for Families — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.