· Private foundation
Corina Higginson Trust Co Laura Ford Trustee
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $27k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $582k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN | $31,500 |
| DC COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLE | $31,500 |
| WE ARE FAMILY SENIOR OUTREACH NETWO | $31,500 |
| CRITICAL EXPOSURE | $25,000 |
| ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION | $17,500 |
| AYUDA | $17,500 |
| WASHINGTON LAWYERS COMMITTEE | $17,500 |
| CALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES | $16,500 |
| IONA SENIOR SERVICES | $16,500 |
| ROB'S BARBERSHOP COMMUNITY FOUNDATI | $16,500 |
| DC FORENSIC NURSE EXAMINERS | $16,500 |
| CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY | $16,500 |
| METRO STAGE | $16,500 |
| SUITED FOR CHANGE | $16,500 |
| DC KINCARE ALLIANCE | $16,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $706k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -14% for the ones you funded once.
87 repeat relationships — 32 still active in FY2025, 55 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $187k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ISIona Senior Services6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +25%
- CWCALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +28%
- DKDC KINCARE ALLIANCE5× · 2021–2025 · $54k · revenue +271%
Funded once
GREATER WASHINGTON URBAN LEAGUE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue ×35- NLNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDU FUNDone grant, 2020 · $25k
- CACOMMUNITY ADVOCATES FOR FAMILY & YOone grant, 2021 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…
The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…
Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…
Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.
Amplify the work of our community by bringing people and resources together.
The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…
To provide technology-driven education, information and skills development for sustained futures to children, youth, and adults in the district of columbia region.
Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.
The mission of the d.c. policy center is to arm decision makers with fact-based, unbiased, and reliable research and analyses to help create a vibrant local economy that can maximize opportunities for residents, workers, and businesses in…
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dc Kincare Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Equipment Connections for Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 146 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ACCOKEEK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Iona Senior Services ↗
- Who funds FOR LOVE OF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CALVARY WOMEN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GRANTMAKERS ↗
- Who funds Critical Exposure Inc ↗
- Who funds DC KINCARE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MY SISTER'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY'S PROMISE ↗
- Who funds ROBS BARBERSHOP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUIPMENT CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Fort Dupont Ice Arena Inc ↗
- Who funds Young Playwrights Theater ↗
- Who funds BYTE BACK ↗
- Who funds Best Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds DC SCORES ↗
- Who funds HERBIE HANCOCK INSTITUTE OF JAZZ ↗
- Who funds KEEN GREATER DC LLC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEPAFRIKA USA INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CREATE ↗
- Who funds Common Good City Farm ↗
- Who funds GREATER DC DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE JOBS INC ↗
- Who funds Alexandria Seaport Foundation ↗
- Who funds YWCA NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA ↗
- Who funds AYUDA INC ↗
- Who funds SUITED FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH ADVANCE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DANCE PLACE ↗
- Who funds DISTRICT ALLIANCE FOR SAFE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds ARTSTREAM INC ↗
- Who funds DANCE INSTITUTE OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds Together We Bake ↗
- Who funds Friends of the National Arboretum ↗
- Who funds ARTS FOR THE AGING INC ↗
- Who funds WILDERNESS LEADERSHIP & LEARNING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Nora Roberts Foundation · William S Abell Foundation Inc · Hattie M Strong Foundation · Eugene & Agnes E Meyer Foundation · Max & Victoria Dreyfus Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Corina Higginson Trust Co Laura Ford Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Accokeek Foundation Inc — 44% of income from government
- Chesapeake Conservancy Inc — 27% of income from government
- Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc — 17% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Action Youth Media Inc — 3% of income from government
- Arts for the Aging Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.