Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE

ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE (Washington) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,533,471 to it, the largest being THE SATTERBERG FOUNDATION INC ($775,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.9M
Funders on record
22
Grants received
$1.5M
Net assets
$793k
12/22 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 22%
01What it does

What Environmental Coalition of South Seattle does

Mission

Ecoss is devoted to promoting environmental justice and sustainability in an effort to build immigrant and refugee communities that can shape their environmental futures. We accomplish this by: promoting connections with nature to build community, foster healing, and integrate ancestral knowledge into environmental practices;creating inclusive spaces and opportunities that engage, connect, and empower communities; leading environmental stewardship efforts through sustainable resource use, community-led conservation, ecosystem restoration, and partnership collaboration; andadvocating for communities on the frontlines of environmental challenges and climate change impacts; centering their experiences and needs.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Clean water. Ecoss' clean water focuses on addressing stormwater pollution in the puget sound region with business owners, homeowners and communities, with intentional emphasis on working with immigrants, refugees and people of color. The majority of this work centers around green stormwater infrastructure (gsi). Ecoss provides multiple language, culturally relevant education on gsi; supports people in obtaining gsi; and recruits and helps train multicultural contractors to install gsi.

    $947,993 spent
    65% of program spending
  2. Environmental stewardship. Ecoss works with immigrant, refugee and other communities of color to provide education and experiences that promote people to be stewards of their environment. This includes assessing community needs and ambitions, providing in-language, culturally relevant resources, and leading activities around outdoor recreation, habitat restoration, and environmental health.

    $296,300 spent
    20% of program spending
  3. Clean energy. Ecoss works with immigrant, refugee and other communities of color to provide education and outreach on clean energy solutions, with a focus on transportation electrification and other decarbonization efforts sponsored by local government.

    $147,018 spent
    10% of program spending
  4. Ecoss piloted an outdoor leadership empowerment program, bringing together diverse community leaders to collaboratively shape an outdoor leadership initiative. By providing training in kayaking, birding, backpacking, and tidepooling, leaders gained expertise to expand outdoor opportunities for their communities and create welcoming spaces for first-time participants. Additionally, ecoss enhances community access to urban and rural green spaces through in-language outings using the community van service.

    $72,313 spent
    5% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,463,624.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.5M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 100 ($651k)2018 Revenue 87 ($1.3M) Expenses 116 ($1.4M) Net assets 84 ($545k)2019 Revenue 129 ($2.0M) Expenses 102 ($1.3M) Net assets 195 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 99 ($1.5M) Expenses 105 ($1.3M) Net assets 228 ($1.5M)2021 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 119 ($1.5M) Net assets 216 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 108 ($1.7M) Expenses 149 ($1.9M) Net assets 228 ($1.5M)2023 Revenue 120 ($1.9M) Expenses 165 ($2.1M) Net assets 197 ($1.3M)2024 Revenue 115 ($1.8M) Expenses 169 ($2.1M) Net assets 145 ($944k)2025 Revenue 125 ($1.9M) Expenses 167 ($2.1M) Net assets 122 ($793k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (125)Expenses (167)Net assets (122)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $683k to $1.4M (+111%).

$725k
$683k
$1.4M
$1.8M
$1.8M
$1.6M
$1.8M
$1.5M
$1.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 8% · 2018 4% · 2020 2% · 2021 11% · 2022 79% · 2023 88% · 2024 79% · 2025 91%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$300k
’17
−$106k
’18
$729k
’19
$213k
’20
$72k
’21
−$182k
’22
−$199k
’23
−$341k
’24
−$152k
’25
4.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Chiyo Crawford

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed111010121413131613
Joined·+3+2+3+5+2+4+4+1
No longer listed·42133414
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 5 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $191k → $213k.

6 of 22 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 20% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 21 of 22 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

29% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE.

51%
largest funder
71%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 52% · 2018 53% · 2019 24% · 2020 37% · 2021 65% · 2022 69% · 2023 59% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

44% of ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

84% of ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
ID
CA
DE
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $312k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−8% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 13%Fundraising 17%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE?
ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE (Washington) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,533,471 to it, the largest being THE SATTERBERG FOUNDATION INC ($775,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE have?
IRS filings report 22 organizations giving $1,533,471 in grants to ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE?
THE SATTERBERG FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $775,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION OF SOUTH SEATTLE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Environmental Coalition of South Seattle →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 22 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing