Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY

CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY (California) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,430,233 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($1,896,964). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$2.0M
Funders on record
20
Grants received
$4.4M
Net assets
$3.9M
9/20 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 66%
01What it does

What Center for Community Advocacy does

Mission

Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Throughout CCA's tenure, organized committees have been able to advocate for their rights to safe healthy living environments and with CCA's help have been able to rehabilitate hundreds of substandard housing units throughout the region. In time, CCA has incorporated two additional programs to its services that focus on Health and Youth. In the early 2000's, with the encouragement of The California Endowment (the state's largest health foundation), CCA added its Promotores Comunitarios health advocacy program. This program focuses on providing and teaching preventative health strategies to individuals and families who have low health literacy and are uninformed/underserved, and develops community health advocates, Promotores de Salud, to serve as health care access points and liaisons within their families and communities. CCA's most recent program addition has been its youth program, Youth4Change. This program was launched in 2017 and focuses on youth leadership development, civic engagement and higher education attainment.

    $1,260,760 spent$208,282 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,260,760.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($863k) Expenses 100 ($617k) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2018 Revenue 90 ($775k) Expenses 108 ($666k) Net assets 108 ($1.4M)2019 Revenue 230 ($2.0M) Expenses 136 ($839k) Net assets 196 ($2.6M)2020 Revenue 78 ($676k) Expenses 145 ($896k) Net assets 179 ($2.3M)2021 Revenue 204 ($1.8M) Expenses 202 ($1.2M) Net assets 222 ($2.9M)2022 Revenue 196 ($1.7M) Expenses 240 ($1.5M) Net assets 238 ($3.1M)2023 Revenue 233 ($2.0M) Expenses 283 ($1.7M) Net assets 258 ($3.4M)2024 Revenue 228 ($2.0M) Expenses 247 ($1.5M) Net assets 295 ($3.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (228)Expenses (247)Net assets (295)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.5M to $3.6M (+47%).

$1.3M
$1.5M
$2.6M
$2.5M
$3.6M
$3.6M
$3.5M
$4.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$245k
’17
$109k
’18
$1.1M
’19
−$219k
’20
$512k
’21
$212k
’22
$262k
’23
$445k
’24
28
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Natalie Herendeen

Executive director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2020191423231815
Joined·+3+0+4+12+0+4+0
No longer listed·3193093
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 9 funders, grant income fell $566k → $522k.

4 of 20 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 19 of 20 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

43%
largest funder
76%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 40% · 2018 49% · 2019 56% · 2020 58% · 2021 43% · 2022 44% · 2023 46% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

56% of CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 45% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

100% of CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $199k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 9%Fundraising 8%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY?
CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY (California) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,430,233 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($1,896,964). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY have?
IRS filings report 20 organizations giving $4,430,233 in grants to CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY?
THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT is the largest funder on record, with $1,896,964 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ADVOCACY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Center for Community Advocacy →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 20 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing