Skip to content
Latino Community Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Community foundation

Latino Community Foundation

Lcf exists to unleash the civic and economic power of latinos in california.

$4.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
96
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Public Benefit$5.6MCommunity Improvement$5.4MHuman Services$3.7MArts & Culture$1.9MCrime & Legal$1.7MYouth Development$1.6MEducation$1.5MCivil Rights$1.4MOther$0
02FY2024 · 96 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 96 grants below total $4,526,150, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,639,575 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $113,425 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $885k
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $2.5M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.1M
$28,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$60M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC$285,000
COMMUNITY INITIATIVES$268,900
NORTH BAY ORGANIZING PROJECT$255,000
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$250,000
TIDES FOUNDATION$138,000
UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY$115,000
RAIZES COLLECTIVE$115,000
COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS$100,000
VALLEY VOICES$90,000
COMMUNITY OVERCOMING RELATIONSHIP ABUSE$84,750
TMC COMMUNITY CAPITAL$77,700
TODEC LEGAL CENTER$75,000
MONUMENT IMPACT$75,000
AL OTRO LADO$75,000
VIVA FOUNDATION$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 31% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SERVICES & IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCATION NETWORK: $50k → 8%UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS: $140k → 9%805 UNDOCUFUND: $40k → 10%NORTH COAST OPPORTUNITIES: $40k → 18%NATIONAL COMPADRES NETWORK: $50k → 8%UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS: $125k → 9%AL OTRO LADO: $75k → 11%UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $115k → 9%UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COU: $65k → 9%UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $46k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $175k → 9%ON THE MOVE: $60k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $68k → 9%ON THE MOVE: $50k → 9%LA LUZ CENTER: $36k → 9%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $205k → 11%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $135k → 9%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $100k → 11%OPPORTUNITY INSTITUTE: $75k → 10%TODEC LEGAL CENTER PERRIS: $100k → 11%CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $100k → 9%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $75k → 11%TODEC Legal Center Perris: $75k → 11%VENTURES: $102k → 13%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $108k → 7%Corazon Healdsburg: $55k → 9%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $74k → 11%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $64k → 7%THE MULTICULTURAL INSTITUTE: $50k → 10%THE LATINA CENTER: $50k → 9%BIRTH COMPANIONS COMMUNITY CENTER: $55k → 10%SERVICES & IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCA: $75k → 8%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE: $62k → 10%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $81k → 7%SERVICES & IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCA: $50k → 8%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR (ALAS): $75k → 7%AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $68k → 7%SERVICES & IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCA: $40k → 8%NUESTRA CASA DE EAST PALO ALTO: $65k → 8%NUESTRA CASA DE EAST PALO ALTO: $50k → 8%Tides Center: $35k → 10%NUESTRA CASA DE EAST PALO ALTO: $40k → 8%Nuestra Casa (Nuestra Casa de East Palo Alto): $33k → 8%CARECEN SF: $75k → 10%CARECEN SF: $50k → 10%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATIO: $100k → 19%INNERCITY STRUGGLE: $40k → 14%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATIO: $60k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
WI
NY
MA
NV
SD
PA
CA
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 152 repeat orgs$4.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

152 repeat relationships: 68 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

152
113

Total granted

$24M
$3.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+25%

Still filing today

95%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $983k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    North Bay Organizing Project
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +105%
  • COMMUNITY INITIATIVES
    6× · 2019–2024 · $893k · revenue +176%
  • COMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $719k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • FC
    FAMILIA CRISTIANA VERBO
    one grant, 2021 · $225k
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +57%
  • PD
    PLAZA DE LA RAZA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $150k · revenue +216%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latina Coalition of Silicon Valley

Our Mission is to develop and strengthen the power of Latinas to advance our collective success through sisterhood, leadership, and civic engagement.

Public Benefit
2
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
3
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
4
Latino Media Collaborative

Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…

Arts & Culture
5
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
6
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
7
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
8
Latino Community Foundation

Lcf exists to unleash the civic and economic power of latinos in california. lcf fulfills the mission by building a movement of critically engaged philanthropic leaders, investing in latino-led orgs, and increasing civic participation of…

Human Services
9
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

—
10
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
11
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
12
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Latinos for Education Inc; the most unlike its peers is Canticle Farm. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

285 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 285 of the 304 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

16
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
92
Early backer (in before they grew)
277/285
Grantees still filing
186/285
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Todec Legal Center Perris: $628,500 · Human ServicesTodec Legal Center…UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $491,300 · Human ServicesUPVALLEY FAMILY CE…ALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $395,100 · Human ServicesALAS AYUDANDO LATI…LA LUZ CENTER: $339,000 · Human ServicesLA LUZ CENTERSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $305,000 · Human ServicesSCOPA HAS A DREAM …MIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT: $263,500 · Human ServicesMIXTECO INDIGENA C…Nuestra Casa de East Palo Alto: $230,000 · Human ServicesSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN): $215,000 · Human ServicesCentral Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative: $185,000 · Human ServicesVENTURES: $156,500 · Human Services+19 more: $1,445,300 · Human Services+19 moreNorth Bay Organizing Project: $1,193,000 · Community ImprovementNorth Bay Organizi…DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $490,300 · Community ImprovementDOLORES C HUERTA F…Fresno Area Hispanic Foundation: $340,000 · Community ImprovementFresno Area Hispan…POWER CALIFORNIA: $311,100 · Community ImprovementPOWER CALIFORNIACOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $231,400 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT: $218,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS: $200,000 · Community ImprovementSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC: $189,000 · Community ImprovementCRESER Capital Fund: $175,000 · Community ImprovementSOMOS MAYFAIR INC: $155,000 · Community Improvement+15 more: $1,010,403 · Community Improvement+15 moreCOMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC: $719,000 · OtherCOMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INCProspera Community Development: $380,700 · OtherDIGITAL NEST INC: $406,200 · OtherSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $444,903 · OtherCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno: $452,600 · Other+80 more: $8,359,350 · Other+80 moreTHE COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & TECH: $298,200 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMUN…Radio Bilingue Inc: $275,000 · Arts & CultureRadio Bili…Raizes Collective: $236,000 · Arts & CultureRaizes Col…Arte Americas The Mexican Arts Center: $193,000 · Arts & CultureArte Ameri…PUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR: $163,850 · Arts & CulturePUENTE DE …PLAZA DE LA RAZA INC: $150,000 · Arts & CulturePLAZA DE L…Arts for LA: $150,000 · Arts & CultureArts for L…SCHOOL OF ARTS AND CULTURE AT MHP: $135,000 · Arts & CultureSCHOOL OF …ARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK: $100,000 · Arts & CultureDANCERS GROUP: $100,000 · Arts & Culture+15 more: $720,100 · Arts & Culture+15 moreCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $893,450 · PhilanthropyAction Council of Monterey County Inc: $511,500 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION: $311,000 · PhilanthropyDaffy Charitable Fund: $175,000 · PhilanthropyCentral Valley Community Foundation A Corporation: $100,000 · PhilanthropyLOS ALTOS MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $83,900 · Philanthropy+1 more: $50,000 · PhilanthropyEducation and Leadership Foundation: $345,000 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · EducationTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION: $195,000 · EducationGENTE ORGANIZADA: $127,000 · EducationVISION Y COMPROMISO: $100,000 · EducationCENTRAL VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER SERVICES CORP: $100,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $92,200 · EducationCALIFORNIA FARMWORKER FOUNDATION: $85,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA BUDGET & POLICY CENTER: $75,000 · Education+6 more: $289,500 · EducationCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $298,000 · Civil RightsVALLEY VOICES: $270,000 · Civil RightsTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $181,500 · Civil RightsMI FAMILIA EN ACCION: $168,960 · Civil RightsLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY: $160,000 · Civil RightsNorth Bay Jobs With Justice: $136,300 · Civil RightsUNITED LATINOS PROMOVIENDO ACCION CIVICA: $115,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND: $85,000 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND: $67,000 · Civil Rights+5 more: $176,500 · Civil Rights
Human Services$4,654,200Community Improvement$4,513,203Other$10,762,753Arts & Culture$2,521,150Philanthropy$2,124,850Education$1,658,700Civil Rights$1,658,260

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorth Bay Organizing Project: $1,193,000 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $893,450 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCOMITE CIVICO DEL VALLE INC: $719,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris: $628,500 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetAction Council of Monterey County Inc: $511,500 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $491,300 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $490,300 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno: $452,600 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $444,903 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetDIGITAL NEST INC: $406,200 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $395,100 over 5y, 22% of budgetProspera Community Development: $380,700 over 5y, 11% of budgetEducation and Leadership Foundation: $345,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetFresno Area Hispanic Foundation: $340,000 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetLA LUZ CENTER: $339,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $313,000 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetPOWER CALIFORNIA: $311,100 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $311,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCOPA HAS A DREAM INC DBA CORAZON HEALDSBURG: $305,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & TECH: $298,200 over 4y, 56% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS: $298,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetALIANZA COACHELLA VALLEY: $285,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetRadio Bilingue Inc: $275,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetFresno Barrios Unidos: $273,000 over 3y, 9.8% of budgetVALLEY VOICES: $270,000 over 4y, 25% of budgetYOUTH ALLIANCE: $264,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT: $263,500 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT: $253,100 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRaizes Collective: $236,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $231,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNuestra Casa de East Palo Alto: $230,000 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetTime For Change Foundation: $230,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetMILPA: $220,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT: $218,000 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetYouth Leadership Institute: $215,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN): $215,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetCultiva La Salud: $210,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center: $210,000 over 4y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LATINO COMMUNITY ASSET BUILDERS: $200,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBilingual Broadcasting Foundation Inc: $200,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetSANTA CRUZ BARRIOS UNIDOS INC: $195,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetArte Americas The Mexican Arts Center: $193,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetSPANISH SPEAKING UNITY COUNCIL OF ALAMEDA COUNTY INC: $189,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative: $185,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIN COALITION: $181,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAGRICULTURE AND LAND BASED TRAINING ASSOCIATION: $180,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…Sierra Health Foundat…The California Wellne…The James Irvine Foun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Weingart FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…The Sobrato Family Fo…The David and Lucile …Public Health Institu…Liberty Hill Foundati…
The California EndowmentCA121.7× affinity110 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · The California Wellness Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Public Health Institute · Liberty Hill Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Latino Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Latino Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    82report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 304 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Latino’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home