Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

In-N-Out Burgers Foundation

The foundation assists children and youth who have been victims of child abuse and prevents others from suffering a similar fate.

$4.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
244
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$11MCrime & Legal$4.1MHealth$2.5MHousing & Shelter$2.2MEducation$1.7MYouth Development$1.4MCivil Rights$437kRecreation & Sports$231kOther$0
02FY2024 · 244 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 244 grants below total $4,358,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,794,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $436,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k105 grants · $802k
  • $10k–50k128 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $980k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CA$400,000
DOOR OF HOPE$250,000
YOLO CRISIS NURSERY$202,500
FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS$200,000
MARY'S PATH$200,000
GAP MINISTRIES$127,000
FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS$50,000
DOOR OF HOPE$50,000
FRIENDS OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER INC - UTAH COUN$50,000
MARY'S PATH$50,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$50,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY$42,500
UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$42,500
DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$40,000
ELIZABETH HOUSE$39,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $26k → 9%WARRIOR FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 14%BETTER CHOICES INC READY FOR LIFE FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY - SHASTA: $40k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 14%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 10%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%RAISE THE FUTURE (ADOPTION EXCHANGE): $30k → 8%BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 9%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 14%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $203k → 16%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $40k → 19%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 10%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $200k → 14%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $34k → 6%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $40k → 16%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $50k → 14%FORGET ME NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $30k → 9%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $40k → 16%MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $50k → 11%MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $28k → 11%FOSTER KINSHIP: $50k → 13%VALLEY TEEN RANCH: $45k → 19%CASA DE AMPARO: $50k → 10%UTAH FOSTER CARE FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%GAP MINISTRIES: $127k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $50k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $40k → 15%RAISE THE FUTURE (ADOPTION EXCHANGE) - CLARK COUNTY: $50k → 13%RAISE THE FUTURE (ADOPTION EXCHANGE) - SALT LAKE: $26k → 8%ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $33k → 13%KAMALI'I FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY - RIVERSIDE COUNTY: $50k → 11%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $40k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $30k → 14%CHILDHELP: $35k → 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $30k → 14%OCJ KIDS: $50k → 11%LAURA'S HOUSE: $40k → 10%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE: $50k → 11%LAURA'S HOUSE: $32k → 10%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $29k → 11%INTERVAL HOUSE: $50k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%MARY'S PATH: $200k → 10%MARY'S PATH: $50k → 10%ST ANNE'S FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $43k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
OR
NV
CA
UT
CO
MO
AZ
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 312 repeat orgs$928k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

312 repeat relationships — 186 still active in FY2024, 126 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

312
32

Total granted

$24M
$259k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+11%

Still filing today

97%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $670k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCivil RightsEducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OLIVE CREST
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +158%
  • DO
    DOOR OF HOPE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $435k · revenue +369%
  • YC
    Yolo Crisis Nursery
    6× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +635%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHADE TREE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -17%
  • KT
    KIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • CF
    COMPASS FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +174%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
3
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
4
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
5
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
6
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
7
Chaves County Casa Program

To provide needed services for abused, neglected, and vulnerable children and their families.

Human Services
8
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
9
Children's Advocacy Center of Greater West Texas

The children's advocacy center of greater west texas, inc.'s mission is to champion the prevention of child abuse and to serve as an ally of abused children with a dedication to securing a safe and nurturing home for each child.

Civil Rights
10
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
11
Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights
12
KidsFirst Child Abuse Prevention Council of Placer County

Our mission is to end child abuse and neglect through educating, advocating, and counseling to empower and strengthen children and families. Our vision is that all children live in a safe, healthy, and nurturing environment.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childnet Youth & Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Texas Christian University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Addiction Recovery ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesSenior Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…School Parent OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterChristian Youth CampsYouth Development ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsLgbtq+ Community SupportCommunity College Foundatio…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Policy Research and AdvocacyEquine Therapy ProgramsDomestic Violence Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr11%39%35–55yr13%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr17%33%20–35yr11%42%35–55yr13%17%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.3%1/379
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,599

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

368 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 368 of the 379 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
89
Early backer (in before they grew)
364/368
Grantees still filing
286/368
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Yolo Crisis Nursery — $325,000 · Human ServicesMARY'S SHELTER — $309,000 · Human ServicesGAP MINISTRIES — $284,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC — $271,500 · Human Services+73 more — $6,843,430 · Human Services+73 moreDOOR OF HOPE — $435,000 · OtherDOOR OF HOPEPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $250,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $225,000 · OtherLMWS INC — $210,000 · OtherFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County — $200,000 · Other+45 more — $4,248,000 · Other+45 moreOLIVE CREST — $1,047,500 · HealthOLIVE CRESTCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION — $138,500 · HealthCALIFORNIA ST…Children's Hospital Los Angeles — $132,500 · HealthRIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER — $120,000 · HealthInspire Life Skills Training Inc — $110,000 · HealthNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $105,000 · HealthHaynes Family of Programs — $100,000 · HealthRiverside University Health System Foundation — $100,000 · HealthVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $95,000 · Health+11 more — $598,050 · Health+11 moreCALICO CENTER — $162,500 · Crime & LegalCALICO CE…CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA — $152,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD CRI…PUBLIC COUNSEL — $127,500 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC CO…NORTHERN NEVADA LEGAL AID — $119,000 · Crime & LegalNORTHERN …Childrens Advocacy Center For Child Abuse Assessment and Treatment — $110,000 · Crime & LegalChildrens…Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of Merced County — $100,500 · Crime & LegalCourt App…WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $96,000 · Crime & LegalST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN NEVADA REGION INC — $75,500 · Crime & LegalPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA — $74,500 · Crime & LegalCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Stanislaus County — $71,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC — $70,000 · Crime & LegalWOMEN OF SUBSTANCE & MEN OF HONOR — $67,000 · Crime & LegalFriends of Alameda County CASA Inc — $65,000 · Crime & LegalFOR THE CHILD INC — $63,000 · Crime & LegalCASA of San Mateo County — $62,500 · Crime & LegalCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL OF SACRAMENTO — $62,500 · Crime & Legal+7 more — $374,000 · Crime & Legal+7 moreVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $314,500 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC — $143,500 · Civil RightsCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $140,000 · Civil RightsFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc — $96,000 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC — $94,500 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY — $86,500 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $82,500 · Civil RightsDALLAS CASA — $82,000 · Civil RightsCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Sacramento County — $76,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $72,500 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO — $50,000 · Civil Rights+5 more — $224,800 · Civil RightsVANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL — $400,000 · EducationMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION — $217,000 · EducationCAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC — $142,000 · EducationUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION — $132,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $68,000 · EducationKINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER — $62,500 · EducationWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT — $58,000 · EducationCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $165,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $145,000 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR HOPE INTERNATIONAL — $109,000 · PhilanthropyCAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $103,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER — $75,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY — $65,000 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $46,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$8,032,930Other$5,568,000Health$2,546,550Crime & Legal$1,852,500Civil Rights$1,462,800Education$1,080,000Philanthropy$708,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOLIVE CREST — $1,047,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE — $435,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetVANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL — $400,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery — $325,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $314,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetMARY'S SHELTER — $309,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetGAP MINISTRIES — $284,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC — $271,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetRAISE THE FUTURE — $261,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $250,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS — $225,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION — $217,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetLMWS INC — $210,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County — $200,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCasa De Amparo — $187,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY HOPE dba ELIZABETH HOUSE — $179,500 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $175,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC — $175,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetINTERVAL HOUSE — $175,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $170,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNeighborhood Ministries Inc — $166,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH — $166,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION — $165,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $163,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCALICO CENTER — $162,500 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION — $160,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetADVOKIDS — $153,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA — $152,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $147,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetArizonans for Children Inc — $146,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL — $145,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $145,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC — $143,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetKAMALII FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY — $142,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC — $142,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetValley Teen Ranch — $142,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetFIRST STAR INC — $142,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER International — $141,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $140,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION — $138,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetOCJ KIDS — $137,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $135,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP ALANDALE — $134,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH — $132,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION — $132,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $132,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBoys Town Nevada Inc — $131,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL ↗
  • Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds GAP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LMWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
  • Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOPE dba ELIZABETH HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALICO CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ADVOKIDS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Arizonans for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds KAMALII FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley Teen Ranch ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STAR INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER International ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Foundation…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Ticket to Dream Found…The Rose Hills Founda…The Ralph M Parsons F…Shelter Partnership I…Sisters of St Joseph …California Court Appo…Dutch Bros FoundationWomen's Foundation of…Calico CenterWeingart Foundation
California Foundation for Stronger CommunitiesCA73.7× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Ticket to Dream Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Dutch Bros Foundation · Women's Foundation of California · Calico Center · Weingart Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization In-N-Out Burgers Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Family Building Blocks Inc — 68% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
100report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to In-N-Out Burgers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to In-N-Out Burgers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 379 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home