Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK

THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK (California) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,056,602 to it, the largest being BAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLLABORATIVE ($915,051). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$25M
Revenue FY2024
27
Funders on record
$2.1M
Grants received
$16M
Net assets
15/27 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%

Against its field

THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK has grown faster than three-quarters of the 3,286 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin8% · above the median
Months of reserve2.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)39% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,286 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.5M) Expenses 100 ($2.4M) Net assets 100 ($829k)2018 Revenue 107 ($2.7M) Expenses 112 ($2.7M) Net assets 90 ($747k)2019 Revenue 120 ($3.0M) Expenses 126 ($3.1M) Net assets 81 ($672k)2020 Revenue 132 ($3.3M) Expenses 132 ($3.2M) Net assets 90 ($749k)2021 Revenue 127 ($3.2M) Expenses 130 ($3.2M) Net assets 90 ($746k)2022 Revenue 135 ($3.4M) Expenses 133 ($3.2M) Net assets 107 ($884k)2023 Revenue 874 ($22M) Expenses 827 ($20M) Net assets 1720 ($14M)2024 Revenue 985 ($25M) Expenses 929 ($23M) Net assets 1956 ($16M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (985)Expenses (929)Net assets (1956)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 86% · 2018 84% · 2019 90% · 2020 90% · 2021 95% · 2022 90% · 2023 81% · 2024 81%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

99% of THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,397 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$58k
17
$82k
18
$75k
19
$77k
20
$3k
21
$130k
22
$1.7M
23
$2.0M
24
2.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 13 funders, grant income rose $42k → $672k.

6 of 27 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)16% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $205k from 6 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Dignity Health). These are real filings, and they are not money THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK raised.

From the IRS filings of THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 26 of 27 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 44% of grant income and the top three 68%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

69% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK.

44%
largest funder
68%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 48% · 2018 57% · 2019 42% · 2020 38% · 2021 41% · 2022 53% · 2023 74%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

25% of THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

100% of THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK's grant income comes from California funders.

CA
NE
MO
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $332k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 27 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $16.1M on record.

Federal$16.1M
grants $16.1Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$14.6M
  • Department of Health and Human Services$1.5M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK?
THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK (California) receives grants from 27 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,056,602 to it, the largest being BAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLLABORATIVE ($915,051). 15 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK have?
IRS filings report 27 organizations giving $2,056,602 in grants to THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK, 15 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK?
BAKERSFIELD KERN REGIONAL HOMELESS COLLABORATIVE is the largest funder on record, with $915,051 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE OPEN DOOR NETWORK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 27funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing