Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dutch Bros Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$17MYouth Development$1.6MHuman Services$1.1MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.1MRecreation & Sports$942kEducation$938kFood & Nutrition$907kPhilanthropy$843kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.5M
$2,500,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION$2,500,000
GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL$75,129
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $938k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 8%SIERRA VISTA CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 15%SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $10k → 9%YOUTH VILLAGES INC: $20k → 9%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $10k → 15%HELPING HANDS INTERNATIONAL: $27k → 13%MAKE-A-WISH MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $10k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 17%LITTLE LAMBS FOUNDATION FOR KIDS INC: $10k → 12%A PRECIOUS CHILD: $50k → 10%MOTIV8 FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%THE PEOPLE'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $10k → 13%RYAN HOUSE: $59k → 11%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $15k → 13%EDDY HOUSE: $10k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%GENERATEHOPE INC: $20k → 11%GOOD NEWS RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 14%CITY HOUSE INC: $10k → 14%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $7k → 10%CASA SUPPORT COUNCIL FOR PIMA COUNTY INC: $10k → 15%CASA OF MARION COUNTY: $20k → 14%WOMEN'S CENTER - YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%CASA OF MARION COUNTY: $16k → 14%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 9%LAVEEN EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $10k → 19%KIDS' MEALS INC: $50k → 16%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION: $10k → 8%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 9%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $6k → 9%ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 15%WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $10k → 8%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%MAKE-A-WISH NEVADA: $10k → 13%ARIZONA'S CHILDREN ASSOCIATION: $10k → 11%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC: $15k → 13%ENVIRONMENTAL ALTERNATIVES: $8k → 18%THRIVE AZ FOSTER CARE PREVENTION REUNIFICATION AND AGED OUT: $25k → 11%THRIVE AZ FOSTER CARE PREVENTION REUNIFICATION AND AGED OUT: $25k → 11%ADELANTE MUJERES: $10k → 8%HEARTS WITH A MISSION: $10k → 18%LATINO NETWORK: $50k → 12%JOSEPHINE COUNTY FOOD BANK: $10k → 18%LATINO NETWORK: $10k → 12%METROPOLITAN FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 178 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

178 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 176 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

178
588

Total granted

$21M
$5.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+17%

Still filing today

70%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7.3M · revenue +2%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $325k · revenue +64%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTERS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $325k · revenue +77%

Funded once

  • United Way of the Columbia-Willamette
    one grant, 2020 · $517k · revenue -2%
  • PS
    PHOENIX-TALENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #4
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • NV
    North Valley Knights Booster Clubgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue ×35

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates

The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.

Civil Rights
3
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
4
Child Advocacy Center of Coos County

To protect children, support families, and bring hope and healing through compassionate, coordinated, and child-centered advocacy, through specialized programs and services, such as multi-disciplinary team coordination, forensic…

Crime & Legal
5
Jackson County Casa

Casa is a unique non-profit helping abused and neglected children in the jackson county family court system. our team of trained volunteers,staff case supervisors, and staff attorneys allow each child to be represented in a court of law…

Civil Rights
6
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
7
Family Service Association

Building community one family at a time, through compassion, advocacy and comprehensive model services, fostering self-sufficiency and sustainable impacts.

8
Casa of Eastern Oregon Inc

Casa of eastern oregon is dedicated to making a difference in the lives of abused and neglected children from baker, grant, harney, lake, malheur, union and wallowa counties through volunteer advocacy.

Crime & Legal
9
Casa El Dorado

CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates)El Dorado provides advocacy services to abused and neglected children in the Child Welfare System in El Dorado County, California.

Crime & Legal
10
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
11
Family Promise of Santa Clarita Valley

With assistance of volunteers from the community and faith groups, the organization works to assist homeless children and their families to achieve sustainable independence, while offering hope, compassion, and preserving individual…

Housing & Shelter
12
Family Law Casa of King County

Family law casa is committed to positive long-term outcomes for children, families, and communities navigating economic injustice across king county. we advance intersectional equity by providing free advocacy services for children…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Idaho and the most unlike its peers is First Fruits Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCancer Support ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Equine Therapy ProgramsYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity College Foundatio…Developmental Disabilities …Youth Development ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Christian Youth CampsDomestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesSchool Parent OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsCommunity Food PantriesYouth Development CentersEnvironmental Conservation …School District FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Food Banks and PantriesUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%59%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%7/498
the rest of the field
13%
240,389/1,819,067

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

459 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 459 of the 777 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
121
Early backer (in before they grew)
447/459
Grantees still filing
318/459
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION — $7,041,601 · OtherMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATIONOHSU FOUNDATION — $908,319 · OtherOHSU FOUNDATIONGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL — $565,026 · OtherFUNDACION CARCAFE — $552,600 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS CASCADES — $500,000 · Other+109 more — $4,054,166 · Other+109 moreMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $7,316,384 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC+17 more — $561,823 · Health+17 moreUnited Way of the Columbia-Willamette — $516,650 · PhilanthropyASIAN PACIFIC FUND — $200,000 · PhilanthropyOREGON HOSPITALITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $86,795 · PhilanthropyRYAN HOUSE — $61,714 · Human ServicesLatino Network — $60,000 · Human ServicesTHRIVE AZ FOSTER CARE PREVENTION REUNIFICATION AND AGED OUT — $50,000 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesMAKE-A-WISH NEVADA — $40,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF MARION COUNTY INC — $35,347 · Human ServicesHEARTS WITH A MISSION — $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesHELPING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC — $28,360 · Human Services+23 more — $321,146 · Human ServicesNorth Valley Knights Booster Club — $200,000 · EducationGrants Pass High School Athletic Booster Club — $120,000 · EducationKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION — $110,000 · EducationUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $100,000 · EducationJosephine County Educational Fund Inc dba Redwood Foundation for Education — $37,000 · EducationSOCIALLY CONSCIOUS COFFEE DBA GENERATIVE PARTNERS — $25,656 · EducationINCIGHT COMPANY — $25,000 · EducationLinfield University — $25,000 · Education+5 more — $78,100 · EducationTREVOR PROJECT INC — $325,000 · Civil RightsCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC — $25,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF LINN COUNTY INC — $15,411 · Civil RightsVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $15,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $10,000 · Civil RightsJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC — $107,500 · Recreation & SportsOregon Futbol Academy (FA) — $77,504 · Recreation & SportsOREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $30,000 · Recreation & SportsOregon Sports Authority Foundation — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $24,607 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS OF TEXAS INC — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC — $20,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$13,621,712Health$7,878,207Philanthropy$853,445Human Services$756,567Education$720,756Civil Rights$410,411Recreation & Sports$359,611

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $7,316,384 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetUnited Way of the Columbia-Willamette — $516,650 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC — $325,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetASSOCIATION OF WOMEN'S BUSINESS CENTERS — $325,000 over 3y, 10% of budgetHispanic Heritage Foundation — $325,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetASIAN PACIFIC FUND — $200,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE ROGUE VALLEY — $137,880 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetGrants Pass High School Athletic Booster Club — $120,000 over 5y, 62% of budgetKIDS IN NEED FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJUSTIN J WATT FOUNDATION INC — $107,500 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAlbie Aware Inc — $96,641 over 3y, 12% of budgetUnited Food Bank — $82,115 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC - GRANTS PASS co EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR — $80,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetOregon Futbol Academy (FA) — $77,504 over 3y, 23% of budgetRYAN HOUSE — $61,714 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetLatino Network — $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK — $55,975 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA INCORPORATED — $55,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetTHRIVE AZ FOSTER CARE PREVENTION REUNIFICATION AND AGED OUT — $50,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA PRECIOUS CHILD INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOREGON HOSPITALITY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 40% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF COLORADO — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OREGON — $50,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVOICES FOR CASA CHILDREN INC — $46,545 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetOREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $45,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $41,413 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH NEVADA — $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ALASKA & WASHINGTON — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $39,070 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJosephine County Educational Fund Inc dba Redwood Foundation for Education — $37,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCASA OF MARION COUNTY INC — $35,347 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFOOD FOR LANE COUNTY — $31,412 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPoverello House — $30,912 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHEARTS WITH A MISSION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS COLORADO — $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HANDS INTERNATIONAL INC — $28,360 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetSOCIALLY CONSCIOUS COFFEE DBA GENERATIVE PARTNERS — $25,656 over 3y, 34% of budgetCHARITABLE PARTNERSHIP FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL HELP ALLIANCE — $25,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetSEEDING JUSTICE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetINCIGHT COMPANY — $25,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

OCF Joseph E Weston Public FoundationOR58.5× affinity39 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Juan Young Trust · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Robert D and Marcia H Randall Charitable Trust · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dutch Bros Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 220%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 21%
  • Bonneville Environmental Foundation100% of income from government
  • Morrison Child and Family Services91% of income from government
  • United Community Action Network82% of income from government
  • Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc69% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact68% of income from government
  • Community Action Organization67% of income from government
  • Access65% of income from government
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc59% of income from government
  • Hearts With a Mission51% of income from government
  • Bridge Meadows36% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres31% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Family Service29% of income from government
  • United Way of the Columbia-Willamette25% of income from government
  • Oregon Coast Aquarium Inc24% of income from government
  • College Dreams Inc23% of income from government
  • Native American Youth and Family Center23% of income from government
  • Family Resource Center of Central Oregon22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank21% of income from government
  • Latino Network15% of income from government
  • Rogue Retreat12% of income from government
  • Marion-Polk Food Share Inc5% of income from government
  • Food for Lane County5% of income from government
  • North By Northeast Community Health Center4% of income from government
  • Linfield University4% of income from government
  • Smart Reading3% of income from government
  • Serendipity Center Inc2% of income from government
  • Josephine County Food Bank1% of income from government
  • Casa of Marion County Inc1% of income from government
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation1% of income from government
  • Casa of Linn County Inc0% of income from government
  • Columbia Community Mental Health Inc0% of income from government
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc0% of income from government
  • Childrens Center0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation0% of income from government
  • Seeding Justice0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
73report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
9rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dutch Bros Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dutch Bros Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 777 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph