Skip to content

· Public charity

In-N-Out Burgers Foundation

The foundation assists children and youth who have been victims of child abuse and prevents others from suffering a similar fate.

$4.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
244
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$11MCrime & Legal$4.1MHealth$2.5MHousing & Shelter$2.2MEducation$1.7MYouth Development$1.4MCivil Rights$437kRecreation & Sports$231kOther$0
02FY2024 · 244 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 244 grants below total $4,358,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,794,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $436,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k105 grants · $802k
  • $10k–50k128 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $980k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$46M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CA$400,000
DOOR OF HOPE$250,000
YOLO CRISIS NURSERY$202,500
MARY'S PATH$200,000
FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS$200,000
GAP MINISTRIES$127,000
FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS$50,000
FRIENDS OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER INC - UTAH COUN$50,000
MARY'S PATH$50,000
DOOR OF HOPE$50,000
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS$50,000
UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$42,500
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY$42,500
DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER$40,000
ELIZABETH HOUSE$39,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $26k → 9%WARRIOR FOR CHILDREN: $25k → 14%BETTER CHOICES INC READY FOR LIFE FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY - SHASTA: $40k → 14%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 14%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 10%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%RAISE THE FUTURE (ADOPTION EXCHANGE): $30k → 8%BAY AREA RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 9%UNION RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 14%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $203k → 16%MARJAREE MASON CENTER: $40k → 19%HELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 10%DEPELCHIN CHILDREN'S CENTER: $25k → 16%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $200k → 14%CHILD ADVOCATES OF PLACER COUNTY: $34k → 6%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $40k → 16%FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS: $50k → 14%YOLO CRISIS NURSERY: $40k → 16%FORGET ME NOT CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $30k → 9%MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $50k → 11%FOSTER KINSHIP: $50k → 13%MAGGIE'S PLACE INC: $28k → 11%VALLEY TEEN RANCH: $45k → 19%CASA DE AMPARO: $50k → 10%GAP MINISTRIES: $127k → 15%GAP MINISTRIES: $50k → 15%UTAH FOSTER CARE FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%GAP MINISTRIES: $40k → 15%RAISE THE FUTURE (ADOPTION EXCHANGE) - CLARK COUNTY: $50k → 13%RAISE THE FUTURE (ADOPTION EXCHANGE) - SALT LAKE: $26k → 8%KAMALI'I FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY - RIVERSIDE COUNTY: $50k → 11%ADOPTION EXCHANGE: $33k → 13%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $40k → 14%DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $30k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $30k → 14%CHILDHELP: $35k → 11%OCJ KIDS: $50k → 11%LAURA'S HOUSE: $40k → 10%CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE: $50k → 11%LAURA'S HOUSE: $32k → 10%SAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN: $29k → 11%INTERVAL HOUSE: $50k → 10%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%MARY'S PATH: $200k → 10%MARY'S PATH: $50k → 10%ST ANNE'S FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $43k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
OR
NV
CA
UT
CO
MO
AZ
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$24M · 312 repeat orgs$928k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

312 repeat relationships: 186 still active in FY2024, 126 since wound down; 33 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

312
32

Total granted

$24M
$259k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+11%

Still filing today

97%
84%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $670k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthCivil RightsEducationHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OLIVE CREST
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.0M · revenue +158%
  • DO
    DOOR OF HOPE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $435k · revenue +369%
  • YC
    Yolo Crisis Nursery
    6× · 2017–2024 · $325k · revenue +635%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SHADE TREE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $18k · revenue -17%
  • KT
    KIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • CF
    COMPASS FAMILY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +174%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa of Solano County

Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.

Civil Rights
2
The Childrens House

To reduce trauma to children who have experienced abuse as well as their families by providing a safe and supportive environment through a collaboration of community agencies.

—
3
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
4
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
5
Allies for Every Child Inc

All children need a childhood. Allies for Every Child brings together and strengthens families, cultivating conditions for children to succeed in life. (Continues on Schedule O)

Human Services
6
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
7
Chaves County Casa Program

To provide needed services for abused, neglected, and vulnerable children and their families.

Human Services
8
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
9
Children's Advocacy Center of Greater West Texas

The children's advocacy center of greater west texas, inc.'s mission is to champion the prevention of child abuse and to serve as an ally of abused children with a dedication to securing a safe and nurturing home for each child.

Civil Rights
10
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
11
Casa Childrens Intervention Services Inc

Provide a voice in a court for abused and neglected children through volunteer court and appointed advocates.

Civil Rights
12
KidsFirst Child Abuse Prevention Council of Placer County

Our mission is to end child abuse and neglect through educating, advocating, and counseling to empower and strengthen children and families. Our vision is that all children live in a safe, healthy, and nurturing environment.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childnet Youth & Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Texas Christian University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

368 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 368 of the 379 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
90
Early backer (in before they grew)
364/368
Grantees still filing
284/368
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Yolo Crisis Nursery: $325,000 · Human ServicesMARY'S SHELTER: $309,000 · Human ServicesGAP MINISTRIES: $284,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $271,500 · Human Services+73 more: $6,843,430 · Human Services+73 moreDOOR OF HOPE: $435,000 · OtherDOOR OF HOPEPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $250,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $225,000 · OtherLMWS INC: $210,000 · OtherFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $200,000 · Other+45 more: $4,248,000 · Other+45 moreOLIVE CREST: $1,047,500 · HealthOLIVE CRESTCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION: $138,500 · HealthCALIFORNIA ST…Children's Hospital Los Angeles: $132,500 · HealthRIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER: $120,000 · HealthInspire Life Skills Training Inc: $110,000 · HealthNATIVIDAD MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $105,000 · HealthHaynes Family of Programs: $100,000 · HealthRiverside University Health System Foundation: $100,000 · HealthVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $95,000 · Health+11 more: $598,050 · Health+11 moreCALICO CENTER: $162,500 · Crime & LegalCALICO CE…CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $152,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD CRI…PUBLIC COUNSEL: $127,500 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC CO…NORTHERN NEVADA LEGAL AID: $119,000 · Crime & LegalNORTHERN …Childrens Advocacy Center For Child Abuse Assessment and Treatment: $110,000 · Crime & LegalChildrens…Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of Merced County: $100,500 · Crime & LegalCourt App…WILLIAMSON COUNTY CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $96,000 · Crime & LegalST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN NEVADA REGION INC: $75,500 · Crime & LegalPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA: $74,500 · Crime & LegalCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Stanislaus County: $71,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC: $70,000 · Crime & LegalWOMEN OF SUBSTANCE & MEN OF HONOR: $67,000 · Crime & LegalFriends of Alameda County CASA Inc: $65,000 · Crime & LegalFOR THE CHILD INC: $63,000 · Crime & LegalCASA of San Mateo County: $62,500 · Crime & LegalCHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL OF SACRAMENTO: $62,500 · Crime & Legal+7 more: $374,000 · Crime & Legal+7 moreVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $314,500 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $143,500 · Civil RightsCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $140,000 · Civil RightsFt Bend County Child Advocates Inc: $96,000 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC: $94,500 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE OF ORANGE COUNTY: $86,500 · Civil RightsCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $82,500 · Civil RightsDALLAS CASA: $82,000 · Civil RightsCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Sacramento County: $76,000 · Civil RightsCASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $72,500 · Civil RightsCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO: $50,000 · Civil Rights+5 more: $224,800 · Civil RightsVANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $400,000 · EducationMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $217,000 · EducationCAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC: $142,000 · EducationUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION: $132,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $68,000 · EducationKINGDOM CAUSES BELLFLOWER: $62,500 · EducationWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT: $58,000 · EducationCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $165,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $145,000 · PhilanthropyALLIANCE FOR HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $109,000 · PhilanthropyCAL STATE FULLERTON PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $103,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE SALT LAKE COUNTY CHILDREN'S JUSTICE CENTER: $75,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE CHILDRENS JUSTICE CENTER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY: $65,000 · PhilanthropyRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO: $46,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$8,032,930Other$5,568,000Health$2,546,550Crime & Legal$1,852,500Civil Rights$1,462,800Education$1,080,000Philanthropy$708,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOLIVE CREST: $1,047,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $435,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetVANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL: $400,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYolo Crisis Nursery: $325,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN: $314,500 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetMARY'S SHELTER: $309,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetGAP MINISTRIES: $284,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC: $271,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetRAISE THE FUTURE: $261,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $250,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $225,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION: $217,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetLMWS INC: $210,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetFive Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County: $200,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCasa De Amparo: $187,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetFAMILY HOPE dba ELIZABETH HOUSE: $179,500 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetCHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC: $175,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetINTERVAL HOUSE: $175,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $175,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA: $170,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNeighborhood Ministries Inc: $166,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH: $166,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $165,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetLOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $163,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCALICO CENTER: $162,500 over 7y, 5.8% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $160,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetADVOKIDS: $153,000 over 7y, 5.2% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA: $152,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $147,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetArizonans for Children Inc: $146,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL: $145,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $145,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC: $143,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetKAMALII FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $142,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC: $142,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetValley Teen Ranch: $142,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetFIRST STAR INC: $142,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetKIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER International: $141,000 over 6y, 5.2% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC: $140,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION: $138,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetOCJ KIDS: $137,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetPROMISES2KIDS FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $135,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCAMP ALANDALE: $134,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $132,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $132,500 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetUC RIVERSIDE FOUNDATION: $132,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBoys Town Nevada Inc: $131,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD UNIVERSITY OF SO CAL ↗
  • Who funds Yolo Crisis Nursery ↗
  • Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MARY'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds GAP MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY BUILDING BLOCKS INC ↗
  • Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
  • Who funds PIVOTAL CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds MY STUFF BAGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LMWS INC ↗
  • Who funds Five Acres The Boys and Girls' Aid Society of Los Angeles County ↗
  • Who funds Casa De Amparo ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOPE dba ELIZABETH HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERVAL HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Neighborhood Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALICO CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds ADVOKIDS ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Arizonans for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds KAMALII FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds CAL POLY POMONA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Valley Teen Ranch ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STAR INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDPOWER TEENPOWER FULLPOWER International ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER OF COLLIN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Foundation for Stronger CommunitiesCA73.7× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Ticket to Dream Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Shelter Partnership Inc · Sisters of St Joseph Healthcare Foundation · California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association · Dutch Bros Foundation · Women's Foundation of California · Calico Center · Weingart Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization In-N-Out Burgers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from In-N-Out Burgers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • Family Building Blocks Inc: 68% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
100report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to In-N-Out Burgers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to In-N-Out Burgers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 379 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on In-N-Out Burgers’ filings →

More from the funding graph