Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE

THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE (California) receives grants from 62 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,552,985 to it, the largest being ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($388,500). 35 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$10M
Funders on record
62
Grants received
$2.6M
Net assets
$2.3M
35/62 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%
01What it does

What The Priority Center Ending the Generational Cycle does

Mission

The mission of the priority center is to deliver life-changing programs to assist people in crisis by giving them the tools and support necessary to end the generational cycle of trauma.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Mental health services- provides a team of clinicians and mental health workers to support individuals of all ages who are experiencing a mental health crisis including suicidal thoughts, plans, or attempts, or thoughts to hurt others, but dont meet the criteria for hospitalization. All services are delivered as field based crisis support and include assessment, therapy, outreach, peer mentoring and case management. The team is available 24/7 to support adults, children, and families in crisis. The focus is to prevent hospitalization or rehospitalization, and when applicable, keeping the family unit together in the best interest of the client. This is accomplished by providing immediate crisis response, offering short-term in-home therapy, linkage to resources, and rehabilitation services.

    $3,921,114 spent
    52% of program spending
  2. In home visitation programs - serves high risk families, with children from birth to 5 years of age that could benefit from a program that includes parent education and linkage to community resources. Program caseworkers provide services to client families every two weeks. Caseworkers provide developmental screenings and educate parents about home car safety, breastfeeding, nutrition, immunizations, healthy development, effective play activities, postpartum depression, oral health, and early literacy. Promotes improved quality and positive relationships between parent and children, positive behavior, and effective age-appropriate communication strategies.

    $1,493,653 spent
    20% of program spending
  3. Basic needs- a public/private partnership that provides basic household items such as basic furniture, non-perishable food, hygiene and infant items to impoverished children and families receiving services from the county social services agency.

    $1,129,672 spent
    15% of program spending
  4. Outreach and educational services- promote mental health and wellness for children and teens in underserved communities by raising awareness and increasing knowledge of protective and risk factors that affect childrens mental health. Assess childrens and familys mental health & other service needs, providing brief intervention and supportive services, and linking clients to community based resources to build protective factors and ameliorate risk factors. Provide a source of support for healthy child development that encourages social and emotional wellbeing during the earliest years of life. Offers a source of education, coaching, and support for parents and connects families to services that support healthy child development.

    $911,827 spent
    12% of program spending
  5. Child advocacy- a multidisciplinary, public/private collaboration that supports children undergoing forensic interviews and investigations following reports of child abuse and work with the law enforcement, health professionals, victim witness advocates and medical professionals to reduce the trauma of abuse as children participate in interviews and medical exams.

    $52,018 spent
    1% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $7,508,284.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($7.4M) Expenses 100 ($7.7M) Net assets 100 ($1.5M)2018 Revenue 94 ($6.9M) Expenses 91 ($7.1M) Net assets 105 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 86 ($6.4M) Expenses 86 ($6.7M) Net assets 84 ($1.3M)2020 Revenue 104 ($7.7M) Expenses 101 ($7.8M) Net assets 77 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 124 ($9.1M) Expenses 114 ($8.8M) Net assets 95 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 120 ($8.8M) Expenses 116 ($8.9M) Net assets 90 ($1.4M)2023 Revenue 127 ($9.4M) Expenses 122 ($9.4M) Net assets 85 ($1.3M)2024 Revenue 134 ($9.9M) Expenses 129 ($10M) Net assets 76 ($1.2M)2025 Revenue 141 ($10M) Expenses 120 ($9.3M) Net assets 147 ($2.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (141)Expenses (120)Net assets (147)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $2.1M to $3.8M (+81%).

$2.2M
$2.3M
$1.9M
$2.6M
$2.6M
$2.1M
$3.8M
$3.2M
$3.6M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 87% · 2018 84% · 2019 88% · 2020 91% · 2021 87% · 2022 86% · 2023 83% · 2024 85% · 2025 78%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

87% of THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (95% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 270 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$356k
’17
−$156k
’18
−$322k
’19
−$115k
’20
$287k
’21
−$84k
’22
−$79k
’23
−$138k
’24
$1.1M
’25
2.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed262626242526322527
Joined·+4+5+6+6+3+7+5+4
No longer listed·458521122
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 14 funders to 24 funders, grant income rose $184k → $392k.

10 of 62 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 62 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 15% of grant income, and it takes 7 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 7 funders to its left

51% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE.

15%
largest funder
30%
top three
~17
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 24% · 2018 29% · 2019 20% · 2020 23% · 2021 17% · 2022 25% · 2023 14% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

35% of THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

70% of THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE's grant income comes from California funders.

IL
WI
NY
NV
PA
CT
CA
MO
DE
NC
DC
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $712k arriving through sponsors registered in 9 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 165 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin11% · above the median
Months of reserve2.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 165 crime & legal nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 14%Fundraising 5%

Governance

22
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

94%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE?
THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE (California) receives grants from 62 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,552,985 to it, the largest being ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($388,500). 35 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE have?
IRS filings report 62 organizations giving $2,552,985 in grants to THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE, 35 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE?
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $388,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE PRIORITY CENTER ENDING THE GENERATIONAL CYCLE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Priority Center Ending the Generational Cycle →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 62 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing