Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL

IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,500 to it, the largest being United Way of Imperial County ($7,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$431k
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$15k
Grants received
$173k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%

Against its field

IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,529 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve3.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,529 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($254k) Expenses 100 ($258k) Net assets 100 ($39k)2018 Revenue 164 ($417k) Expenses 143 ($370k) Net assets 221 ($86k)2019 Revenue 135 ($345k) Expenses 134 ($346k) Net assets 217 ($84k)2020 Revenue 137 ($348k) Expenses 130 ($336k) Net assets 248 ($96k)2021 Revenue 145 ($369k) Expenses 132 ($340k) Net assets 323 ($125k)2022 Revenue 142 ($362k) Expenses 134 ($345k) Net assets 367 ($142k)2023 Revenue 146 ($371k) Expenses 145 ($374k) Net assets 384 ($149k)2024 Revenue 170 ($431k) Expenses 158 ($407k) Net assets 447 ($173k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (170)Expenses (158)Net assets (447)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 90% · 2018 88% · 2019 95% · 2020 95% · 2021 89% · 2023 15% · 2024 90%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,767 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$4k
17
$47k
18
$2k
19
$12k
20
$29k
21
$17k
22
$3k
23
$25k
24
3.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'17
'24*
total
funders
1
1

From the IRS filings of IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL.

52%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL?
IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $14,500 to it, the largest being United Way of Imperial County ($7,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $14,500 in grants to IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL.
Who is the largest funder of IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL?
United Way of Imperial County is the largest funder on record, with $7,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like IMPERIAL COUNTY CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing