· Public charity
Fjc
To support the nonprofit sector through donor advised funds, fiscal sponsorship, nonprofit lending, and customized philanthropic solutions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 747 grants below total $41,748,202 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $45,806,391 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,058,189 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k162 grants · $1.1M
- $10k–50k414 grants · $8.3M
- $50k–250k139 grants · $13M
- $250k+32 grants · $20M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PROJECT SHEMA | $2,803,656 |
| NATAN | $2,738,655 |
| PARTNERS FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP | $1,242,965 |
| HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC | $1,009,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA | $1,000,300 |
| GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER | $926,200 |
| CIVIC NATION | $750,000 |
| CONSERVATION FOUNDATION | $575,000 |
| THE NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN | $570,125 |
| THE KIRVA INSTITUTE FOR TORAH AND SPIRITUAL PRACTICE FUND | $557,895 |
| THE BELL | $531,631 |
| A NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT | $500,000 |
| THE JEWISH COMMUNITY OF POLAND FUND | $496,682 |
| Individual grant recipient | $478,093 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC | $422,605 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $12.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
856 repeat relationships — 500 still active in FY2025, 356 since wound down; 218 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations6× · 2020–2025 · $7.7M · revenue +55%
- NYNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN6× · 2020–2025 · $4.4M · revenue +42%
- ECEDITH & CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE BENSONHURST INC5× · 2019–2025 · $4.2M · revenue +39% · 37% of their budget
Funded once
- TNTHE NATAN FUNDone grant, 2024 · $2.7M
- MMMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $1.5M · revenue +41%
- CRCONGREGATION RACHMISTRIVKA INCone grant, 2022 · $1.5M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…
The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…
Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.
The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service and the most unlike its peers is Boscobel Restoration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1377 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1377 of the 1,817 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds EDITH & CARL MARKS JEWISH COMMUNITY HOUSE BENSONHURST INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIPINC ↗
- Who funds ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds LINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds US FRIENDS OF THE VAN LEER JERUSALEM INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds ANTHOS HOME INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM INC ↗
- Who funds THE TAFT SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAT NOAM ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHAPIN HALL CENTER FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · The Carl Marks Foundation Inc · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Cross River Community Foundation · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Harold Grinspoon Foundation · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Fjc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Enterprise Community Partners Inc — 22% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Reinstitute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Partners for Educational Leadershipinc — 2% of income from government
- The Frisch School — 0% of income from government
- Torah Academy of Bergen County — 0% of income from government
- Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.