· Public charity
The Harold Grinspoon Foundation
Inspired by the deep meaning and joy offered by jewish living, THE HAROLD GRINSPOON FOUNDATION helps people connect to jewish values, faith, traditions, and culture and build vibrant jewish communities.
Read this first · the figures below need context
50% of The Harold Grinspoon Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to The Jewish Federations Of North America Inc, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 163 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2023, the last year The Harold Grinspoon Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 147 organizations, $8M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 208 grants below total $8,271,948 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,401,226 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $9,129,278 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k35 grants · $260k
- $10k–50k116 grants · $2.6M
- $50k–250k56 grants · $4.7M
- $250k+1 grant · $658k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM | $658,358 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF CHICAGO | $169,850 |
| LANDER GRINSPOON ACADEMY | $161,686 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LOS ANGELES | $151,260 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY | $138,061 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA | $135,862 |
| JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BOSTON INC | $118,696 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND | $116,980 |
| BEBER CAMP | $108,850 |
| SHALOM INSTITUTE CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER | $101,590 |
| CONGREGATION B'NAI ISRAEL | $101,488 |
| MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC | $100,450 |
| NEW ENGLAND JEWISH ACADEMY | $100,000 |
| ELI AND BESSIE COHEN CAMPS | $99,900 |
| UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER STAMFORD NEW CANAAN AND DARIEN | $99,623 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 24% of The Harold Grinspoon Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
213 repeat relationships — 144 still active in FY2023, 69 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call). Read against FY2023, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $218k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALander-Grinspoon Academy Solomon Schechter Day School8× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +59%
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON9× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +19%
- JCJewish Community Centers of Chicago8× · 2018–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +14%
Funded once
FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $770k · revenue +231%- IBINTERNATIONAL BEIT DIN INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +241%
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $98k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Operation of summer day camp and overnight camp which combines activities with a Torah education
Provide facilities, programs and guidance for people of all age groups of the community. develop and improve the cultural, educational, physical and social condition of the membership. encourage cooperation and understanding within the…
To foster a vibrant, collaborative jewish community by providing leadership and generating financial resources.
The jewish association for community living responds to the needs of persons with developmental disabilities and their families in our community by providing quality support and services enhanced by jewish tradition.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of Greater Rochester Ny Inc and the most unlike its peers is Newcaje Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 51 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
319 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 319 of the 380 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT ↗
- Who funds Lander-Grinspoon Academy Solomon Schechter Day School ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
- Who funds Jewish Community Centers of Chicago ↗
- Who funds SHALOM ORLANDO INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN THE BERKSHIRES INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGFIELD JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP RAMAH IN CALIFORNIA INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST CAMPERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY FEDERATION OF YOUNG MEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION AND YOUNG WOMEN'S ↗
- Who funds Camp Ohel Inc ↗
- Who funds ELI AND BESSIE COHEN CAMPS ↗
- Who funds FRESH AIR SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CAMP MORASHA INC ↗
- Who funds BEBER CAMP PROPERTY INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH COMMUNITY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
- Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds JEWISH CAMP AND CONFERENCE SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Foundation for Jewish Camp Inc · The Jewish Federations of North America Inc · Jewish Community Centers Association of North America · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Ahba Inc · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Board of Jewish Education Inc · Covenant Foundation · Ylry Inc · Fjc · Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Harold Grinspoon Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Springfield Jewish Community Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- B'nai Brith Men's Camp Association — 7% of income from government
- Jewish Federation of Delaware Inc — 6% of income from government
- Jewish Community Center On the Palisades — 4% of income from government
- Tampa Jccfederation Inc — 3% of income from government
- Jewish Community Center of Baltimore Inc — 2% of income from government
- Shalom Orlando Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Associated Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Jewish Federation of Greater New Haven Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.