Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION

SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 32 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,652,110 to it, the largest being CLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION ($4,677,000). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$11M
Funders on record
32
Grants received
$17M
Net assets
$1.1M
21/32 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 67%
01What it does

What Securing America's Future Energy Foundation does

Mission

Safe is an action-oriented, nonpartisan organization committed to transportation, energy, and supply chain policies that advance the economic and national security of the united states, its partners, and allies. Since 2004, safe has worked with its energy security leadership council-a peerless coalition of current and former fortune 500 ceos and retired 4-star admirals and generals-to support secure, resilient, and sustainable energy solutions.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Education - to inform the general public, opinion leaders and key decision makers about the nation's economic and national security risk as it relates to its dependence on oil through reports, technical reviews, relevant research and strategic events.

    $2,075,402 spent$47,110 earned by the program
    30% of program spending
  2. The center for critical minerals strategy aims to secure all aspects of the critical minerals supply chain to help ensure the national and economic security of the united states and our allies as we transition to a minerals-based economy. Ccms is the sole ngo partner for private sector engagement to the u.s. State department's mineral security partnership. The center is also home to the sub-committee on opportunities and risks in the critical mineral sector (scor) project with five leading mining investment firms.safe's center for strategic industrial materials is dedicated to advancing resilient and secure supply chains for the industrial materials critical to america's national and economic security. The center collaborates with producers, buyers, government, and ngos to achieve tangible policy outcomes that enhance domestic industry supply chain reliability in a global market. Safe's center for grid security provides policy analysis and recommendations to address challenges facing the nation's electrical infrastructure from a national security perspective. Gsp leverages the perspectives of business and former military leaders to support expanded access to reliable and…

    $1,755,753 spent
    25% of program spending
  3. The coalition for reimagined mobility is a global initiative advancing outcomes to shape transportation systems that support competitiveness and resilience. Remo convenes private and public sector stakeholders, conducts research, and develops policy for the u.s. And europe to accelerate the deployment and scaling of transportation technologies that advance efficient, sustainable, safe, and secure ways to move people and goods.

    $1,697,438 spent$70,000 earned by the program
    25% of program spending
  4. The european initiative for energy security (eies) advocates for secure pan-european and national energy policies and is dedicated to fostering collaboration between government and industry leaders. Eies seeks to address critical energy challenges and champion comprehensive solutions for the benefit of europe's energy security, transition, and industrial competitiveness. Eies works with the energy security leadership council- europe (eslceurope), composed of military, political, and business figures, to achieve these goals. While launched through safe, eies maintains independence in its research and policy positions.

    $841,659 spent
    12% of program spending
  5. Policy development

    $327,302 spent
    5% of program spending
  6. Lobbying

    $118,920 spent
    2% of program spending
  7. Government affairs

    $81,224 spent
    1% of program spending

The 7 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $6,897,698.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.7M) Expenses 100 ($5.6M) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2018 Revenue 76 ($4.4M) Expenses 87 ($4.8M) Net assets 59 ($700k)2019 Revenue 50 ($2.9M) Expenses 74 ($4.1M) Net assets -47 ($-553747)2020 Revenue 57 ($3.3M) Expenses 50 ($2.8M) Net assets 54 ($642k)2021 Revenue 166 ($9.5M) Expenses 111 ($6.2M) Net assets 275 ($3.2M)2022 Revenue 102 ($5.8M) Expenses 165 ($9.2M) Net assets -20 ($-230520)2023 Revenue 124 ($7.1M) Expenses 154 ($8.6M) Net assets -146 ($-1726229)2024 Revenue 186 ($11M) Expenses 141 ($7.8M) Net assets 93 ($1.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (186)Expenses (141)Net assets (93)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.6M to $4.5M (+77%).

$2.2M
$2.1M
$1.7M
$2.6M
$4.5M
$6.4M
$5.6M
$7.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 13%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$171k
’17
−$480k
’18
−$1.3M
’19
$491k
’20
$3.3M
’21
−$3.4M
’22
−$1.5M
’23
$2.8M
’24
0.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Raphael Diamond

President & CEO

Board chair

Admiral Dennis C Blair

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1616161215191921
Joined·+2+3+2+6+6+5+4
No longer listed·2363252
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 10 funders, grant income rose $1.5M → $3.0M.

9 of 32 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 25% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 32 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 28% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

78% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION.

28%
largest funder
52%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 41% · 2018 43% · 2019 36% · 2020 42% · 2021 65% · 2022 48% · 2023 36% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

21% of SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 66% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION draws 94% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 8 states in all.

WA
IL
NY
OH
CA
MD
DC
GA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $4.2M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.0M on record.

Federal$1.0M
grants $1.0Mcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of State$1.0M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 18%Fundraising 4%

Governance

9
board members
78%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

80%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 15 states

MN
MI
NY
OR
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
OK
LA
GA
FL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Securing America's Future Energy Alliance Inc · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION?
SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 32 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,652,110 to it, the largest being CLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION ($4,677,000). 21 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 32 organizations giving $16,652,110 in grants to SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION, 21 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION?
CLIMATE IMPERATIVE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $4,677,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SECURING AMERICA'S FUTURE ENERGY FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 32 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing