Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
76
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Civil Rights$19MPublic Benefit$14MHuman Services$7.7MCommunity Improvement$6.9MEducation$6.5MCrime & Legal$4.7MHousing & Shelter$3.7MPhilanthropy$2.9MEnvironment$2.3MOther$21M
02FY2024 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k25 grants · $585k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+31 grants · $14M
$205,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$182M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC$1,250,000
POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE$1,080,000
ALABAMA FORWARD$850,000
MISSISSIPPI ENGAGED$805,000
ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE$700,000
STATE VOICES$675,000
CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY PRIORTITIES$637,500
STATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT$575,000
NORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER$405,000
MISSISSIPPI VOTES$400,000
GEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC$400,000
ALABAMA ARISE$350,000
WEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC$350,000
STEP UP LOUISIANA$330,000
SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE$325,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $7.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ANDERSON INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC: $125k → 15%THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY: $220k → 17%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE: $700k → 9%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $235k → 14%NATURAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUND: $40k → 9%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $160k → 29%ARKANSAS UNITED: $20k → 14%THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY: $100k → 17%COLABORATIVA LA MILPA: $30k → 12%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $700k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $70k → 14%PARTNER COMMUNITY CAPITAL: $20k → 9%THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY: $20k → 17%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $425k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $70k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $275k → 9%LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $250k → 11%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $200k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $50k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $100k → 9%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $100k → 29%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $100k → 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $40k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $50k → 9%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $275k → 13%CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC: $50k → 29%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $20k → 9%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $225k → 13%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $40k → 14%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA: $20k → 9%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $88k → 13%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $100k → 8%SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK: $25k → 13%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $450k → 13%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $350k → 13%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $225k → 13%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $290k → 14%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $75k → 14%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $75k → 14%GEORGIA COALITION FOR THE PEOPLE'S AGENDA: $50k → 13%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $62k → 14%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $50k → 14%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $20k → 14%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $20k → 14%WOMEN WATCH AFRIKA: $20k → 14%EL PUEBLO INC: $300k → 8%EL PUEBLO INC: $275k → 8%EL PUEBLO INC: $200k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WI
NY
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$66M · 82 repeat orgs$21M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

82 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 36 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

82
100

Total granted

$66M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+28%

Still filing today

88%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsPublic BenefitEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +30%
  • SL
    STATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT
    3× · 2020–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +86%
  • PC
    POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE
    3× · 2021–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +760% · 41% of their budget

Funded once

  • BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA
    one grant, 2020 · $1.9M · revenue -69%
  • NF
    NEIGHBORHOOD FUNDERS GROUP ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKERS OPPORTUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $1.0M
  • SL
    STATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKING GROUP
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
2
Carolina Common Enterprise

The specific objectives and purposes of this corporation shall be to assist individuals and communities, particularly those in low-income and socially disadvantaged areas, in the creation, expansion, and improvement of rural and…

Community Improvement
3
Action Institute Nc

Action institute nc is a community organization and citizens action group that organizes residents of low-wealth communities and constituencies most of whom are people of color- to represent their own interests on issues of social and…

—
4
Community Action Coalition for South Central Wisconsin Inc

At community action coalition for south central wisconsin, inc. (cac) our mission is to transform our communities by fostering conditions where everyone can achieve social and economic security. cac exists to push back on poverty. our…

—
5
New Georgia Project Action Fund

New georgia project action find is on a mission to increase the civic participation of the new georgia majority and other historically marginalized communities by building grassroots political power in support of progressive leaders,…

—
6
New Disabled South Inc

To improve the lives of disabled people and build strong disability justice and rights movements in the South through research & knowledge building, advocacy & policy change, non-partisan voter engagement, and coalition building.

Health
7
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
8
Central Carolina Economic Development Alliance

The alliance stimulates economic expansion and facilitates job creation by promoting central south carolina as a valuable location for businesses.

Community Improvement
9
Southern Center for Human Rights

The Southern Center for Human Rights is working for equality, dignity, and justice for people impacted by the criminal legal system in the Deep South. SCHR fights for a world free from mass incarceration, the death penalty, the…

Civil Rights
10
New Disabled South Rising Inc

New Disabled South Rising is the advocacy arm of New Disabled South focusing on poverty and care, criminalization and democracy.

Civil Rights
11
Alliance for a Healthier South Carolina

Convene and connect diverse stakeholders to align and catalyze efforts to improve health and well-being for communities across South Carolina.

—
12
Appalachian Community Capital Development Foundation

To increase small business lending by providing appalachian member institutions that serve underserved people and communities with new sources of capital.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern Vision Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Women Watch Afrika. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Immigrant Worker SupportCommunity Arts CentersSenior Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportLocal Food System Organizat…Environmental Conservation …Community FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%12%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.6%1/158
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,407

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

156 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 156 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
40
Early backer (in before they grew)
155/156
Grantees still filing
90/156
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC — $3,680,000 · Civil RightsPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE …STATE VOICES — $3,675,000 · Civil RightsSTATE VOICESPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE — $2,180,000 · Civil RightsPOWER COALITION FOR EQU…Democracy North Carolina — $1,735,000 · Civil RightsDemocracy North Carolin…ALABAMA FORWARD — $1,225,000 · Civil RightsALABAMA FORWARDCIVIC TN — $1,075,000 · Civil RightsCIVIC TNNORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER — $993,500 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI ENGAGED — $805,000 · Civil Rights+11 more — $3,290,000 · Civil Rights+11 moreNEIGHBORHOOD FUNDERS GROUP ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKERS OPPORTUNITY FUND — $1,000,000 · OtherSTATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT ON BEHALF OF SOUTHERN WORKING GROUP — $1,000,000 · OtherSouth Carolina Community Loan Fund — $1,465,744 · OtherLatino Community Fund Inc — $1,390,000 · OtherARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC — $1,210,000 · Other+101 more — $23,841,849 · Other+101 moreSTATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT — $2,445,000 · Public BenefitSTATE LEADERSHIP P…Center on Budget and Policy Priorities — $1,672,500 · Public BenefitCenter on Budget a…OPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $1,400,000 · Public BenefitOPPORTUNITY FINANC…KENTUCKY COALITION INC — $1,110,000 · Public BenefitKENTUCKY COALITION…GEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $1,055,000 · Public BenefitGEORGIA BUDGET AND…SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE — $845,000 · Public BenefitSOUTHERN VISION AL…One Voice — $810,000 · Public BenefitOne VoiceThe Commonwealth Institute for — $810,000 · Public BenefitThe Commonwealth I…INVEST IN LOUISIANA — $810,000 · Public BenefitINVEST IN LOUISIAN…INSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY — $810,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE ON TAXAT…KENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC — $725,000 · Public BenefitWEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC — $610,000 · Public BenefitTogether Louisiana — $600,000 · Public Benefit+3 more — $621,000 · Public BenefitASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $2,615,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AME…SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC — $1,035,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN …EL PUEBLO INC — $820,000 · Human ServicesEL PUEBLO…GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $797,000 · Human ServicesGEORGIA L…SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK INC — $622,500 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST…THE ORDINARY PEOPLE SOCIETY TOPS — $340,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR RURAL STRATEGIES INC — $320,000 · Human ServicesNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $280,000 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $265,000 · Human Services+9 more — $595,050 · Human Services+9 moreGALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC — $1,289,500 · Community ImprovementSouth Carolina Association for Community Economic Development — $1,185,000 · Community ImprovementWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC — $960,000 · Community ImprovementHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION — $691,698 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY VENTURES CORPORATION — $452,500 · Community ImprovementFOUNDATION FOR THE MID SOUTH INC — $350,000 · Community ImprovementMOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC — $300,000 · Community ImprovementFAIR COUNT INC — $300,000 · Community ImprovementMETANOIA — $272,500 · Community ImprovementKENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE INC — $270,000 · Community Improvement+8 more — $798,806 · Community ImprovementBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $1,940,000 · EducationVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND — $965,000 · EducationNORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC — $950,000 · EducationIMPRINTS CARES — $670,000 · EducationGEORGIA ALLIANCE EDUCATION FUND INC — $500,000 · EducationWE ARE DOWN HOME — $490,000 · EducationNC COUNTS COALITION — $410,000 · EducationCODE THE DREAM INC — $270,000 · Education+7 more — $230,000 · EducationSOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE — $2,060,000 · Crime & LegalVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE — $900,000 · Crime & LegalCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation — $885,000 · Crime & LegalAPPALACHIAN CITIZENS LAW CENTER INC — $405,000 · Crime & LegalFORWARD JUSTICE — $320,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more — $85,000 · Crime & Legal
Civil Rights$18,658,500Other$29,907,593Public Benefit$14,323,500Human Services$7,689,550Community Improvement$6,870,004Education$6,425,000Crime & Legal$4,655,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC — $3,680,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetSTATE VOICES — $3,675,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $2,615,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetSTATE LEADERSHIP PROJECT — $2,445,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE — $2,180,000 over 3y, 41% of budgetSOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE — $2,060,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $1,940,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetDemocracy North Carolina — $1,735,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetCenter on Budget and Policy Priorities — $1,672,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetSouth Carolina Community Loan Fund — $1,465,744 over 3y, 19% of budgetOPPORTUNITY FINANCE NETWORK — $1,400,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLatino Community Fund Inc — $1,390,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetGALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC — $1,289,500 over 4y, 27% of budgetALABAMA FORWARD — $1,225,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC — $1,210,000 over 3y, 75% of budgetSouth Carolina Association for Community Economic Development — $1,185,000 over 3y, 31% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $1,110,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetCIVIC TN — $1,075,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetGEORGIA BUDGET AND POLICY INSTITUTE INC — $1,055,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetSOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC — $1,035,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER — $993,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetVIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND — $965,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT HUB INC — $960,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE INC — $950,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR SOUTHERN EQUITY — $930,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetVOICE OF THE EXPERIENCED VOTE — $900,000 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetCOMMUNITYWORKS INC — $898,245 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetCenter for Heirs' Property Preservation — $885,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetNC CHILD — $866,250 over 3y, 14% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE — $845,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetEL PUEBLO INC — $820,000 over 4y, 18% of budgetOne Voice — $810,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetThe Commonwealth Institute for — $810,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetINVEST IN LOUISIANA — $810,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY — $810,000 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI ENGAGED — $805,000 over 1y, 59% of budgetGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $797,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetDEEP CENTER INCORPORATED — $772,500 over 3y, 20% of budgetREYNOLDA HOUSE INC — $729,603 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetKENTUCKY CENTER FOR ECONOMIC POLICY INC — $725,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISE CORPORATION — $691,698 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetIMPRINTS CARES — $670,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK INC — $622,500 over 4y, 52% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA CENTER ON BUDGET AND POLICY INC — $610,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetTogether Louisiana — $600,000 over 3y, 74% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $565,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetInstitute for Southern Studies Inc — $555,000 over 3y, 71% of budgetCOALFIELD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $545,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundMarguerite Casey Foun…Z Smith Reynolds Foun…Windward FundWK Kellogg FoundationWay to RiseTides FoundationAnnie E Casey Foundat…The Ford FoundationRockefeller Family Fu…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY87.4× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · Windward Fund · WK Kellogg Foundation · Way to Rise · Tides Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Neighborgood Partners Inc — 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
35report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 224 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines