Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Center for Community Change

The mission of community change is to build the power and capacity of low-income people, especially low-income people of color, to change the policies and institutions that impact their lives.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
15
States reached
$700k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$13MHuman Services$3.4MCommunity Improvement$2.5MPublic Benefit$2.2MHousing & Shelter$1.5MPhilanthropy$1.5MEmployment$1.3MHealth$1.0MOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 35 grants below total $2,490,482 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,558,713 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $68,231 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k22 grants · $558k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+1 grant · $700k
$40,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$700,000
VOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS INC$200,800
WASHINGTON CENTER FOR EQUITABLE GROWTH$169,182
NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT$142,500
PROJECT HOPE-THE PEOPLE-TO-PEOPLE HEALTH FOUNDATIO$140,500
FUSION PARTNERSHIPS INC$120,000
COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION$100,000
WASHINGTON INTERFAITH NETWORK (WIN)$100,000
VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC$60,000
TIDES CENTER$50,000
WORKERS CENTER FOR RACIAL JUSTICE$50,000
SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO$50,000
ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT$50,000
WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION$40,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FIRST UP: $85k → 22%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $40k → 10%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWOR: $75k → 10%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $120k → 12%ARKANSAS UNITED COMMUNITY COALITION: $93k → 14%FAMILY FORWARD OREGON: $50k → 12%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $100k → 8%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $220k → 7%HOUSINGNOLA: $195k → 23%LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA: $40k → 11%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $50k → 10%HOUSING CALIFORNIA: $78k → 12%FAMILY FORWARD OREGON: $50k → 12%COMUNIDADES UNIDAS: $77k → 8%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $100k → 7%HOUSINGNOLA: $133k → 23%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $50k → 10%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $115k → 17%FAMILY FORWARD OREGON: $50k → 12%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $100k → 7%HOUSINGNOLA: $59k → 23%TIDE CENTER: $516k → 10%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $93k → 17%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $75k → 7%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $125k → 12%TIDE CENTER: $150k → 10%UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY: $75k → 7%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $110k → 12%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $103k → 12%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $100k → 12%TIDES CENTER: $95k → 10%SCOPE: $121k → 14%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $100k → 12%TIDES CENTER: $50k → 10%SCOPE: $110k → 14%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $42k → 14%SCOPE: $100k → 14%COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE: $50k → 12%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $125k → 10%SCOPE: $100k → 14%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $95k → 10%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $95k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $75k → 10%PARENT VOICESCHILD CARE RESOURCE & REFERRAL NETWORK: $50k → 10%SCOPE: $75k → 14%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $50k → 10%PARENT VOICES OAKLAND: $45k → 10%SCOPE: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 100 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

100 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 84 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

100
74

Total granted

$24M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+27%

Still filing today

94%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementCrime & LegalPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IC
    ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $903k · revenue +642%
  • I
    ISAIAH
    7× · 2017–2023 · $772k · revenue +101%
  • M(
    MOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH)
    7× · 2017–2023 · $672k · revenue +84% · 26% of their budget

Funded once

  • NY
    New York University
    one grant, 2023 · $225k · revenue +11%
  • P
    POLICYLINK
    one grant, 2020 · $135k · revenue -22%
  • RACE FORWARD
    one grant, 2020 · $135k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Philadelphia Area Jobs With Justice

Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.

Employment
3
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
4
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
5
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
6
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
7
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
8
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
9
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
10
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
11
Central Ohio Workers Center Inc

The Central Ohio Worker Center is a non-profit organization that educates, empowers, and advocates for and with low-wage and immigrant workers in Central Ohio.

Civil Rights
12
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Washington Interfaith Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Policy Research and AdvocacyAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Women & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%16%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%45%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%5%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%4/199
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,366

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

187 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 187 of the 199 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
59
Early backer (in before they grew)
185/187
Grantees still filing
118/187
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $903,350 · Civil RightsILLINOIS COALITION FO…MOTHERING JUSTICE — $670,000 · Civil RightsMOTHERING JUSTICEWorkers Center For Racial Just NFP — $601,000 · Civil RightsWorkers Center For Ra…BLACKROOTS ALLIANCE — $444,000 · Civil RightsBLACKROOTS ALLIANCENEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $435,000 · Civil RightsNEW GEORGIA PROJECT I…TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $260,600 · Civil RightsHOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC — $225,000 · Civil Rights+29 more — $1,963,664 · Civil Rights+29 moreTIDES CENTER — $825,503 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERCOLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $603,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO PEOPLE'S AL…Strategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $581,250 · Human ServicesStrategic Concepts I…UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $570,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FOR A NEW ECO…PARENT VOICES OAKLAND — $430,000 · Human ServicesPARENT VOICES OAKLAN…HousingNOLA — $386,500 · Human ServicesHousingNOLACalifornia Child Care Resource and Referral Network — $320,000 · Human ServicesCalifornia Child Car…VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $268,600 · Human ServicesComunidades Unidas — $238,250 · Human ServicesHOUSING CALIFORNIA INC — $223,525 · Human ServicesArkansas United — $192,012 · Human Services+18 more — $808,850 · Human Services+18 moreOHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $1,420,150 · OtherOHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVEMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER — $575,750 · OtherMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTERCASA INC — $348,950 · OtherMake the Road New York — $355,562 · OtherISAIAH — $772,000 · OtherISAIAHWashington Interfaith Network — $550,000 · OtherWashington Interfaith Network+78 more — $5,438,182 · Other+78 moreFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $721,500 · Community ImprovementFUSION PARTNE…MOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH) — $671,500 · Community ImprovementMOSES (METROP…TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $542,250 · Community ImprovementTEXAS ORGANIZ…VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $390,000 · Community ImprovementVIRGINIA ORGA…COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $152,500 · Community ImprovementMETRO IAF INC — $140,000 · Community ImprovementGRANITE STATE ORGANIZING PROJECT INC — $137,000 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINK — $135,000 · Community ImprovementRACE FORWARD — $135,000 · Community Improvement+10 more — $434,000 · Community Improvement+10 moreONEAMERICA — $794,312 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION — $624,500 · Public BenefitKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $508,250 · Public BenefitCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $218,000 · Public Benefit+4 more — $165,000 · Public BenefitPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND — $588,000 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC — $335,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $264,674 · PhilanthropyMICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT — $251,750 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $75,000 · Philanthropy+7 more — $225,000 · PhilanthropyCornell University — $700,000 · EducationNew York University — $225,000 · EducationNEW JERSEY RESOURCE PROJECT INC — $200,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $152,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $70,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION — $60,000 · EducationUNIDOS MINNESOTA EDUCATION FUND — $55,000 · Education+3 more — $76,850 · Education
Civil Rights$5,502,614Human Services$5,447,490Other$9,460,594Community Improvement$3,458,750Public Benefit$2,310,062Philanthropy$1,739,424Education$1,638,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $903,350 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $825,503 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetONEAMERICA — $794,312 over 7y, 3.6% of budgetISAIAH — $772,000 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $721,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCornell University — $700,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH) — $671,500 over 7y, 26% of budgetMOTHERING JUSTICE — $670,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION — $624,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetCOLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE — $603,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetWorkers Center For Racial Just NFP — $601,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetPROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND — $588,000 over 2y, 58% of budgetStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $581,250 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetMAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER — $575,750 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetUNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $570,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetWashington Interfaith Network — $550,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $542,250 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $508,250 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetBLACKROOTS ALLIANCE — $444,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetNEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC — $435,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetPARENT VOICES OAKLAND — $430,000 over 6y, 23% of budgetVIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC — $390,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHousingNOLA — $386,500 over 3y, 16% of budgetMake the Road New York — $355,562 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCASA INC — $348,950 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC — $335,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCalifornia Child Care Resource and Referral Network — $320,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC — $268,600 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $264,674 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $260,600 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetMICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT — $251,750 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetCOLORADO CROSS DISABILITY COALITION — $250,000 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetNATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT — $242,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetComunidades Unidas — $238,250 over 6y, 8.1% of budgetCENTRAL FLORIDA JOBS WITH JUSTICE CORP — $235,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetWashington Community Action Network Education & Research Fund — $229,500 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetHOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC — $225,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetNew York University — $225,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSING CALIFORNIA INC — $223,525 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $218,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM RIGHTEOUS ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE — $209,000 over 4y, 68% of budgetWashington Low Income Housing Alliance — $207,500 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $206,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES OF COMMUNITY ACTIVISTS & LEADERS (VOCAL-NY) INC — $200,800 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC — $200,250 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetNEW JERSEY RESOURCE PROJECT INC — $200,000 over 3y, 19% of budgetArkansas United — $192,012 over 6y, 13% of budgetFAMILY FORWARD OREGON — $175,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ONEAMERICA ↗
  • Who funds ISAIAH ↗
  • Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds MOSES (METROPOLITAN ORGANIZING STRATEGY ENABLING STRENGTH) ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERING JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO PEOPLE'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Workers Center For Racial Just NFP ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLIER FUND ↗
  • Who funds Strategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education ↗
  • Who funds MAINE PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
  • Who funds Washington Interfaith Network ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACKROOTS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENT VOICES OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA ORGANIZING INC ↗
  • Who funds HousingNOLA ↗
  • Who funds Make the Road New York ↗
  • Who funds CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds California Child Care Resource and Referral Network ↗
  • Who funds VOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CROSS DISABILITY COALITION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Comunidades Unidas ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL FLORIDA JOBS WITH JUSTICE CORP ↗
  • Who funds Washington Community Action Network Education & Research Fund ↗
  • Who funds HOOSIER ACTION RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING CALIFORNIA INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…New Venture FundWindward FundCenter for Community …Marguerite Casey Foun…Tides FoundationProteus Fund IncCasa IncBorealis PhilanthropyThe Ford FoundationCommon Counsel Founda…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY91.5× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Windward Fund · Center for Community Change Action · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Tides Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · Casa Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · The Ford Foundation · Common Counsel Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Center for Community Change funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 120%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Salvation and Social Justice a Nj N — 52% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Partnerships Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Center On Rural Innovation Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Junta for Progressive Action Inc — 35% of income from government
  • Capaces Leadership Institute — 20% of income from government
  • Willamette Valley Law Project Dba Pcun Foundation — 18% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
12get no government money at all
50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 199 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines