· Public charity
Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc
To embrace the gospel value of welcoming the stranger by promoting the dignity and protecting the rights of immigrants in partnership with a dedicated network of catholic and community legal immigration programs.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $110k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $335k
- $50k–250k65 grants · $9.3M
- $250k+10 grants · $4.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC | $1,529,163 |
| COUNCIL ON AMERICAN ISLAMIC RELATIONS | $500,718 |
| UFW FOUNDATION | $423,830 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN ADVANCING JUSTICE - LA | $390,829 |
| COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS (CHIRLA) | $344,123 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT LEGAL SERVICES | $312,343 |
| EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | $310,045 |
| WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NAT'L ASSOCI OF EVANGELICALS | $304,564 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE IN NORTHERN CALI | $264,143 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO | $257,232 |
| CENTRO LA FAMILIA ADVOCACY SERVICES | $245,478 |
| SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL | $219,255 |
| SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC | $217,830 |
| CALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION | $214,695 |
| HUMAN AGENDA | $214,485 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
118 repeat relationships — 91 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +87%
- CCCatholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Miami Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +244%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC8× · 2017–2024 · $850k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- MCMEXICAN CONSULATE SCREENING PROJECTone grant, 2018 · $436k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES OF PHOENIXone grant, 2022 · $154k
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAIIone grant, 2023 · $88k · revenue -36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Immigrant legal services of the central coast (ilscc) provides immigration-related legal services and information to the immigrant community of the central coast region of california, primarily santa cruz, san benito, and monterey…
Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.
Amigos center provides stability to families and the community by providing expert immigration legal services at a low cost or pro bono rate.
Catholic charities of louisville serves people in need, especially the poor and oppressed. consistent with the principles of catholic social teaching, we build bridges of hope, mercy, and justice as we accompany struggling families and…
La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Our mission is to reflect Gods intent for humanity, to live as a reconciled and and restored community. We stand in solidarity with immigrants by providing high quality, affordable immigration legal services and advocating for just…
CIR provides low-cost immigration legal services through DOJ-accredited representatives and recognized immigration clinics, assisting immigrant neighbors with consultations, family-based immigration, asylum, removal defense, humanitarian…
As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.
Provide high-quality legal services in a compassionate, incarnational, and culturally-appropriate way and empower churches to serve their sojourner neighbors well through collaborative partnerships.
Provide low bono & pro bono legal immigration services.
Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.
Immigration Legal Services and Advocacy (ISLA) provides direct representation to indigent detained immigrants throughout Louisiana on a pro bono basis and under a universal representation model. ISLA provides information to the public to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Las Cruces Inc and the most unlike its peers is Opening Doors International Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
159 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 159 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Legal Services Archdiocese of Miami Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEARNING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds UFW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS ↗
- Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds Education and Leadership Foundation ↗
- Who funds Centro La Familia Advocacy Services INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds POMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC MIGRATION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Labor Council ↗
- Who funds California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation ↗
- Who funds Human Agenda ↗
- Who funds SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IACO IMMIGRATION AND AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARS EQUALITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds THE FRESNO CENTER ↗
- Who funds Oasis Legal Services ↗
- Who funds ACCESS CALIFORNIA SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California ↗
- Who funds EL RESCATE ↗
- Who funds Community Action Board ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT ↗
- Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SOLIDARITY ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA ↗
- Who funds Santa Barbara County Immigrant Legal Defense Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Immigrant Legal Resource Center · California Access to Justice Commission · The California Endowment · Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc · Unidosus · Weingart Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Fwdus Education Fund Inc · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Sunlight Giving · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Vera Institute of Justice Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Palm Beach Inc — 12% of income from government
- Catholic Charities Bureau Inc — 1% of income from government
- Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.