Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Immigrant Legal Resource Center

To work with and educate immigrants, community organizations, and the legal sector to continue to build a democratic society that values diversity and the rights of all people.

$5.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$20MCrime & Legal$19MPublic Benefit$12MHuman Services$6.5MPhilanthropy$2.0MEducation$1.7MInternational$1.7MArts & Culture$1.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $546k
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.2M
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND - HQ$1,140,579
AAAJ-SC$1,075,917
CLINIC NAT'L OFFICE$1,007,328
TEXAS CIVIL RIGHTS PROJECT$205,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY$201,794
UNIDOSUS$197,904
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE - HQ NY$173,921
ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT REFUGEE$125,550
CVIIC$85,000
COASTSIDE HOPE$84,478
LAREDO IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE$83,000
IMMIGRATION INST BAY AREA - SF$82,728
EMPLOYEE RIGHTS CENTER$82,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SF$80,978
APILO$80,978
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOAT PEOPLE SOS INC: $85k → 16%LAREDO IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE: $155k → 21%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $84k → 11%LAREDO IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE: $115k → 21%SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $75k → 14%LAREDO IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE: $83k → 21%CVIIC: $115k → 19%CVIIC: $112k → 19%CVIIC: $85k → 19%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $53k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SF: $170k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SF: $81k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SF: $74k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $95k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $84k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $74k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $202k → 8%COASTSIDE HOPE: $61k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $160k → 8%COASTSIDE HOPE: $58k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $104k → 8%COASTSIDE HOPE: $57k → 7%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $72k → 19%COASTSIDE HOPE: $57k → 7%COASTSIDE HOPE: $57k → 7%TIDES CENTER: $93k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $75k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $75k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $75k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $75k → 10%CARECEN - SF: $260k → 10%AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK: $211k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER (CARECEN) OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $148k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER - CARECEN: $130k → 10%CARECEN - SF: $130k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER CARECEN OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $130k → 10%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER CARECEN OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $130k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $227k → 10%AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK: $93k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $153k → 10%AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK: $75k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $136k → 10%AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK: $75k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $75k → 10%AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK: $75k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES SF: $75k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES REF & IMM SVCS SM: $65k → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $61k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$65M · 127 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +55% for the ones you funded once.

127 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 79 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

127
89

Total granted

$65M
$1.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+55%

Still filing today

98%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $243k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NE
    NALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +46%
  • AA
    ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10M · revenue +50%
  • CL
    CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.8M · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • NA
    NEW AMERICA MEDIA
    one grant, 2017 · $160k
  • MA
    MISSION ASSET FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $130k · revenue +71%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF SAN DIEGOgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $118k · revenue +474%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
2
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
3
Al Otro Lado

Al otro lado (aol) provides innovative cross-border legal services to refugees, deportees, and other migrantsin tijuana, mexico and throughout throughout the u.s., with a focus on southern california. aol's mission is to uplift immigrant…

Human Services
4
Immigrant Defenders Law Center

Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef) is a next-generation social justice law firm that defends our immigrant communities against injustices in the immigration system.

Crime & Legal
5
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
6
Immigrant Legal Services of the Central Coast Inc

Immigrant legal services of the central coast (ilscc) provides immigration-related legal services and information to the immigrant community of the central coast region of california, primarily santa cruz, san benito, and monterey…

Crime & Legal
7
Centro De Ayuda Legal Para Imigrantes of Mountain View

The organization's primary mission is to provide immigration legal services and community education about immigration law. this involves legal representation to the low-income immigrant community, including help to those brought to the us…

Crime & Legal
8
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
9
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
10
Social Justice Collaborative

Social justice collaborative is californias leading provider of compassionate full scope deportation defense legal services to low income non-citizens in northern and central california. we boldly provide post-convition relief to…

Crime & Legal
11
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
12
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central American Resource Center and the most unlike its peers is Soapbox Productions and Organizing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Lgbtq+ Community SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsSenior Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesYmca Youth Development
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%19%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr11%32%35–55yr13%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%5%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr17%10%20–35yr11%63%35–55yr13%14%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/225
the rest of the field
14%
26,001/186,753

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

212 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 212 of the 225 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
82
Early backer (in before they grew)
208/212
Grantees still filing
163/212
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,304,728 · Crime & LegalASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUS…Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc — $1,484,984 · Crime & LegalCommunity Legal Services in E…JUST FUTURES LAW INC — $1,304,115 · Crime & LegalJUST FUTURES LAW INCPangea Legal Services — $1,011,857 · Crime & LegalPangea Legal ServicesIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE — $605,362 · Crime & Legal+12 more — $3,014,229 · Crime & Legal+12 moreNALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND — $10,752,537 · OtherNALEO EDUCATIONAL FUNDUNIDOSUS — $1,615,046 · OtherUNIDOSUSIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA — $1,172,706 · OtherMISSION ACTION INC — $1,018,357 · Other+72 more — $8,842,462 · Other+72 moreCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC — $8,811,220 · Civil RightsCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRA…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC — $2,052,265 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION P…ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $1,114,800 · Civil RightsILLINOIS COALITION FOR…+21 more — $1,269,071 · Civil Rights+21 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,115,651 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $943,357 · Human ServicesCENTRAL AMER…AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK — $558,357 · Human ServicesAFRICAN ADVO…COASTSIDE HOPE — $543,461 · Human ServicesCOASTSIDE HO…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $485,786 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…Central Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative — $439,404 · Human ServicesCentral Vall…TIDES CENTER — $392,857 · Human ServicesLAREDO IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE — $352,500 · Human Services+57 more — $2,685,124 · Human Services+57 moreFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $2,078,265 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATION — $174,500 · Philanthropy+2 more — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of San Francisco — $943,357 · EducationEducation and Leadership Foundation — $502,008 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $220,987 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC — $114,649 · Education+4 more — $74,250 · EducationInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,513,343 · InternationalCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno — $106,760 · International+4 more — $145,175 · International
Crime & Legal$17,725,275Other$23,401,108Civil Rights$13,247,356Human Services$7,516,497Philanthropy$2,352,765Education$1,855,251International$1,765,278

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND — $10,752,537 over 8y, 16% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $10,304,728 over 8y, 13% of budgetCATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC — $8,811,220 over 8y, 16% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $2,078,265 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC — $2,052,265 over 8y, 30% of budgetUNIDOSUS — $1,615,046 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,513,343 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc — $1,484,984 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetJUST FUTURES LAW INC — $1,304,115 over 4y, 85% of budgetIMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA — $1,172,706 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO — $1,115,651 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS — $1,114,800 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetMISSION ACTION INC — $1,018,357 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetPangea Legal Services — $1,011,857 over 8y, 11% of budgetCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $943,357 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $943,357 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE — $751,620 over 4y, 18% of budgetCALIFORNIA CHANGELAWYERS — $729,808 over 2y, 20% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND — $650,453 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE — $628,357 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetLABORS TRAINING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE — $625,600 over 7y, 25% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE — $605,362 over 2y, 11% of budgetLEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC — $558,357 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetAFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK — $558,357 over 6y, 26% of budgetAsian Law Caucus — $558,357 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetNIHONMACHI LEGAL OUTREACH DBA ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGAL OUTREACH — $548,991 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetLegal Aid Society of San Mateo County — $544,961 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetLA RAZA CENTRO LEGAL - SAN FRANCISCO — $543,461 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetCOASTSIDE HOPE — $543,461 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT — $537,628 over 6y, 12% of budgetEducation and Leadership Foundation — $502,008 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $485,786 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCentral Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative — $439,404 over 6y, 20% of budgetCALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $406,718 over 2y, 10% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $392,857 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM — $355,650 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetLAREDO IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE — $352,500 over 3y, 100% of budgetPUBLIC LAW CENTER — $326,434 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetCentro La Familia Advocacy Services INC — $283,551 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND — $269,940 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $220,987 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $217,652 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC — $205,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetInterfaith Movement for Human Integrity — $186,600 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $174,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC — $171,035 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA — $169,007 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCalifornia Rural Legal Assistance Foundation — $168,047 over 7y, 1.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION PROJECT OF THE NATIONAL LAWYERS GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUST FUTURES LAW INC ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRATION INSTITUTE OF THE BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CYO OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Pangea Legal Services ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds SANTA CLARA COUNTY ASIAN LAW ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA CHANGELAWYERS ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF OAKLAND ↗
  • Who funds CANAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds LABORS TRAINING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL DEFENSE ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL SERVICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN ADVOCACY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Asian Law Caucus ↗
  • Who funds NIHONMACHI LEGAL OUTREACH DBA ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER LEGAL OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County ↗
  • Who funds LA RAZA CENTRO LEGAL - SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds COASTSIDE HOPE ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT ↗
  • Who funds Education and Leadership Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Central Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COLLABORATIVE FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM ↗
  • Who funds LAREDO IMMIGRANT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Centro La Familia Advocacy Services INC ↗
  • Who funds MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Legal Immigr…The California Endowm…The California Wellne…NEO Philanthropy IncSierra Health Foundat…California Immigrant …Sunlight GivingCalifornia Access to …Asian Americans Advan…Evelyn and Walter Haa…The James Irvine Foun…Tides Center
Catholic Legal Immigration Network IncMD115.2× affinity55 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc · The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · California Immigrant Policy Center · Sunlight Giving · California Access to Justice Commission · Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California · Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund · The James Irvine Foundation · Tides Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Immigrant Legal Resource Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals — 67% of income from government
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
89report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 225 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home