Skip to content
Unidosus at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Unidosus

UNIDOSUS builds a stronger america by creating opportunities for latinos.

$20M
Granted FY2025still arriving
198
Grants FY2025still arriving
33
States reached
$2.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$22MHousing & Shelter$21MCommunity Improvement$20MHealth$13MEmployment$10MCivil Rights$9.2MEducation$5.6MYouth Development$3.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 198 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 198 grants below total $19,758,840, the rows itemized in this filing. The $20,366,678 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $607,838 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k84 grants · $2.2M
  • $50k–250k89 grants · $9.7M
  • $250k+14 grants · $7.8M
$54,500
Median grant
33
States reached
$126M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PUERTO RICO INC$2,628,962
URBAN LEAGUE OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY$876,000
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORPORATION$502,450
MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER$491,780
NATIONAL COALITION FOR ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$384,500
LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION$384,119
EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION$382,700
CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC$373,809
SPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING$369,200
MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY$335,064
DEVNW$289,700
HOUSING AND EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC$285,800
CENTRO CAMPESINO FARMWORKER CENTER INC$259,967
THE RESURRECTION PROJECT$258,325
SELF HELP ENTERPRISES$226,150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $34.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTRO FAMILIAR NUEVA ESPERANZA: $180k → 10%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $517k → 12%EL CONCILIO CALIFORNIA: $258k → 12%CENTRO HISPANO OF DANE COUNTY: $152k → 10%CONEXION AMERICAS: $170k → 14%LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $384k → 13%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $258k → 9%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $209k → 12%CONEXION AMERICAS: $159k → 14%LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $272k → 13%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $254k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $374k → 11%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $204k → 12%CREDIT & HOMEOWNERSHIP EMPOWERMENT SERVICES INC: $214k → 15%LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $180k → 13%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $226k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA: $320k → 11%CREDIT & HOMEOWNERSHIP EMPOWERMENT SERVICES INC: $203k → 15%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $216k → 9%Chicanos Por La Causa: $317k → 11%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $212k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA - PHOENIX: $314k → 11%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $183k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $230k → 11%EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $152k → 9%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $187k → 11%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $186k → 11%CONEXION AMERICAS: $182k → 14%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $715k → 12%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $185k → 11%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $664k → 12%CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC: $175k → 11%MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $492k → 12%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $171k → 15%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $163k → 15%ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MEXICAN AMERICANS (AAMA): $200k → 16%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $153k → 15%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $151k → 14%HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $168k → 13%MEXICAN AMERICAN COUNCIL INC: $150k → 15%GADS HILL CENTER: $159k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $228k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $225k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $210k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $207k → 14%NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $204k → 14%Northwest Side Housing Center: $193k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $159k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125M · 275 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

275 repeat relationships: 185 still active in FY2025, 90 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

275
47

Total granted

$125M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+32%

Still filing today

94%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $328k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterHealthEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    ONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.9M · revenue +127% · 46% of their budget
  • ME
    MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +103%
  • UL
    Urban League of San Diego County
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.9M · revenue +12% · 44% of their budget

Funded once

  • WA
    WEST ANGELES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $113k · revenue 0%
  • CC
    COLLEGIATE CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL OF LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2024 · $84k · revenue -12%
  • LA
    LATIN AMERICAN MONTESSORI BILINGUAL PUBLgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $66k · revenue +62%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centro Las Americas Inc

To create a fully-integrated multi-cultural, multi-linguistic health and human services delivery system, while developing long-term economic strength and sustainability.

Human Services
2
Latino Political Network
—
3
La Oportunidad Inc

A mission of "championing the development of latino individuals and families to create a strong, peaceful community," through its holistic, culturally relevant programming by providing bilingual/bicultural human services.

—
4
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
5
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
6
Puentes

Puentes mission is to be an innovator in the development of comprehensive, collaborative and culturally relativistic initiatives that seek to provide permanent, sustainable solutions through addressing root causes, disparities and…

—
7
Centro Hispano

To empower Latino and Utah families by providing equitable access to information, resources, and educational programs to advance and strengthen the community.

Human Services
8
La Colaborativa Inc

Empower latinx immigrants to enhance the social and economic health of our community and people and to hold institutional decision makers accountable to the communities they serve.

Human Services
9
Latino Media Collaborative

Latino Media Collaborative's mission is to leverage the power of Latino and community news media to impact policy, change narratives, and promote civic engagement, while also supporting advancement of the sector through capacity building,…

Arts & Culture
10
Latino Chamber of Commerce of Dane County Inc

Our mission is to maximize economic development and job creation though advocacy and programs that generate success and value for our Latino and Non-Latino business community.

Community Improvement
11
Latino Health Access

Partner with communities to bring health, equity and sustainable change through education, services, consciousness-raising and civic participation.

Human Services
12
Esperanza Community Center Inc

Esperanza community center is committed to empowering families through educational, legal and support services to be able and confident to succeed and lift future generations:- english as a second language (esl) and adult literacy classes-…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congreso De Latinos Unidos Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lucky Shoals Community Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

311 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 311 of the 335 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
87
Early backer (in before they grew)
307/311
Grantees still filing
234/311
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $2,305,208 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLCMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $2,219,766 · Human ServicesMI CASA RESOURCE CENTEREL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $1,662,097 · Human ServicesNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $1,652,475 · Human ServicesGREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $1,151,975 · Human ServicesLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $1,123,979 · Human Services+55 more: $23,114,846 · Human Services+55 moreMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $3,114,627 · OtherMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOP…Urban League of San Diego County: $2,868,895 · OtherUrban League of San Dieg…HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC: $1,788,454 · OtherHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORID…LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC: $1,529,293 · OtherLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS …ADMINISTRATION OF RESOURCES & CHOICES: $1,429,049 · OtherADMINISTRATION OF RESOUR…VISIONARY HOME BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $938,000 · OtherTEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC: $1,195,837 · OtherNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $941,639 · Other+39 more: $12,568,353 · Other+39 moreSPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING: $2,494,302 · Housing & ShelterSPANISH COALITION…The Resurrection Project: $1,540,617 · Housing & ShelterThe Resurrection …ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP: $1,504,734 · Housing & ShelterORANGE COUNTY COM…EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $1,472,890 · Housing & ShelterEAST LA COMMUNITY…HOUSING & EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $1,387,838 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING & EDUCATI…Self-Help Enterprises: $1,321,961 · Housing & ShelterSelf-Help Enterpr…COMMUNITY SERVICES OF NEVADA: $1,318,764 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY SERVICE…MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,108,798 · Housing & ShelterMONTEBELLO HOUSIN…CENTRO CAMPESINO FARMWORKER CENTER INC: $1,097,942 · Housing & ShelterCENTRO CAMPESINO …NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN: $1,097,428 · Housing & ShelterNEW ECONOMICS FOR…CORPORACION DESARROLLO ECONOMICO DE SALUD Y VIVIENDA: $713,975 · Housing & Shelter+11 more: $3,742,594 · Housing & Shelter+11 moreCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC: $1,558,511 · HealthCONGRESO DE …LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC: $1,281,527 · HealthLA MAESTRA F…ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $1,041,596 · HealthALTAMED HEAL…CLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC: $1,021,081 · HealthCLINICAS DE …THE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE: $911,400 · HealthTHE LATINO A…ALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $845,773 · HealthALIVIO MEDIC…PROJECT VIDA HEALTH CENTER: $745,923 · HealthPROJECT VIDA…SU CLINICA FAMILIAR INC: $698,510 · HealthSEA MAR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS: $627,874 · HealthLA CLINICA DEL PUEBLO INC: $622,252 · HealthCENTRO DE SALUD DE LA COMUNIDAD DE SAN YSIDRO INC: $537,065 · HealthCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO: $500,849 · HealthURBAN HEALTH PLAN INC: $481,107 · Health+8 more: $2,322,172 · Health+8 moreONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC: $6,896,239 · EducationONE STOP CA…CENTRO DE AYUDA PARA LOS HISPANOS: $995,527 · EducationCENTRO DE A…PODER: $807,534 · EducationPODERPUENTE LEARNING CENTER: $549,499 · EducationEDU-FUTURO: $504,259 · Education+11 more: $2,715,864 · Education+11 moreNational Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development: $2,132,263 · Community ImprovementNational Co…BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $1,366,836 · Community ImprovementBRIGHTON PA…CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,084,300 · Community ImprovementCYPRESS HIL…LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $929,541 · Community ImprovementLATINO ECON…Homes on The Hill Community Development Corp: $759,353 · Community ImprovementHomes on Th…EL CENTRO INC: $726,450 · Community ImprovementEL CENTRO I…ST NICKS ALLIANCE CORPORATION: $677,199 · Community ImprovementST NICKS AL…EL PASO COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM PROJECT BRAVO INC: $537,357 · Community ImprovementSpanish American Committee: $518,780 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK: $431,089 · Community ImprovementNeighborhood Housing Services of Queens CDC Inc: $396,651 · Community Improvement+10 more: $2,288,133 · Community Improvement+10 moreCENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC: $1,163,989 · EmploymentSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC: $827,482 · EmploymentCOMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC: $731,170 · EmploymentBuilding Skills Partnership: $573,460 · EmploymentMexican American Opportunity Foundation: $362,190 · EmploymentTHE GROW GROUP INC: $311,800 · EmploymentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $282,600 · EmploymentNueva Esperanza Inc: $278,622 · EmploymentSHIRLINGTON EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION CENTER INC: $271,249 · Employment+3 more: $358,533 · Employment
Human Services$33,230,346Other$26,374,147Housing & Shelter$18,801,843Health$13,195,640Education$12,468,922Community Improvement$11,847,952Employment$5,161,095

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC: $6,896,239 over 9y, 46% of budgetMISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY: $3,114,627 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetUrban League of San Diego County: $2,868,895 over 5y, 44% of budgetSPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING: $2,494,302 over 9y, 16% of budgetCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $2,305,208 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMI CASA RESOURCE CENTER: $2,219,766 over 8y, 22% of budgetNational Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development: $2,132,263 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC: $1,788,454 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetEL CENTRO DE LA RAZA: $1,662,097 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER: $1,652,475 over 9y, 14% of budgetCONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC: $1,558,511 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetThe Resurrection Project: $1,540,617 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC: $1,529,293 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP: $1,504,734 over 6y, 7.8% of budgetEAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION: $1,472,890 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetADMINISTRATION OF RESOURCES & CHOICES: $1,429,049 over 9y, 26% of budgetHOUSING & EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $1,387,838 over 9y, 35% of budgetBRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL: $1,366,836 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetSelf-Help Enterprises: $1,321,961 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES OF NEVADA: $1,318,764 over 9y, 67% of budgetLA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC: $1,281,527 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC: $1,195,837 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetCENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC: $1,163,989 over 8y, 11% of budgetGREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $1,151,975 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $1,123,979 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetMONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,108,798 over 9y, 57% of budgetCENTRO CAMPESINO FARMWORKER CENTER INC: $1,097,942 over 9y, 4.7% of budgetNEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN: $1,097,428 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $1,084,300 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION: $1,041,596 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONEXION AMERICAS: $1,021,978 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetCLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC: $1,021,081 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRO DE AYUDA PARA LOS HISPANOS: $995,527 over 9y, 78% of budgetMexican American Council Inc: $950,372 over 9y, 14% of budgetHISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $946,231 over 9y, 9.5% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC: $941,639 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetVISIONARY HOME BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $938,000 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetLATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $929,541 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetTHE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE: $911,400 over 9y, 27% of budgetHACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $865,858 over 9y, 2.4% of budgetGADS HILL CENTER: $850,250 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetALIVIO MEDICAL CENTER INC: $845,773 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCREDIT & HOMEOWNERSHIP EMPOWERMENT SERVICES: $834,342 over 9y, 7.1% of budgetSER-JOBS FOR PROGRESS OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST INC: $827,482 over 7y, 9.3% of budgetPODER: $807,534 over 9y, 13% of budgetTHE CONCILIO: $800,974 over 9y, 5.4% of budgetMary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc: $770,498 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHomes on The Hill Community Development Corp: $759,353 over 9y, 16% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE STOP CAREER CENTER OF PR INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds Urban League of San Diego County ↗
  • Who funds SPANISH COALITION FOR HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds CHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC ↗
  • Who funds MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO DE LA RAZA ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST SIDE HOUSING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CONGRESO DE LATINOS UNIDOS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Resurrection Project ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY HOUSING CORP ↗
  • Who funds EAST LA COMMUNITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ADMINISTRATION OF RESOURCES & CHOICES ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING & EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Self-Help Enterprises ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds LA MAESTRA FAMILY CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRAINING & CAREERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MONTEBELLO HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO CAMPESINO FARMWORKER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ECONOMICS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CONEXION AMERICAS ↗
  • Who funds CLINICAS DE SALUD DEL PUEBLO INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO DE AYUDA PARA LOS HISPANOS ↗
  • Who funds Mexican American Council Inc ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC SERVICES COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds VISIONARY HOME BUILDERS OF CALIFORNIA INC ↗
  • Who funds LATINO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE LATINO ALZHEIMERS AND MEMORY DISORDERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds HACIENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hispanic Federation I…National Association …Hispanics in Philanth…Raza Development Fund…Wells Fargo FoundationCatholic Legal Immigr…Naleo Educational FundEnterprise Community …Immigrant Legal Resou…Weingart FoundationUnited Way of Metropo…The California Endowm…
Hispanic Federation IncNY83.1× affinity61 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hispanic Federation Inc · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Hispanics in Philanthropy · Raza Development Fund Inc · Wells Fargo Foundation · Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc · Naleo Educational Fund · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Weingart Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · The California Endowment

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Unidosus funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Unidosus. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Hacienda Community Development Corporation: 48% of income from government
  • Latin American Community Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres: 31% of income from government
  • Latino Network: 15% of income from government
  • Sociedad Latina Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Corvallis Neighborhood Housing Services Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Lawrence Communityworks Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Bienestar Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Coalition of Florida Farmworker Organizations Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Opa-Locka Community Development Corporation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Cuban American National Council Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Centro Cultural of Washington County: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
83report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 335 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Unidosus’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home