Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Naleo Educational Fund

The naleo education fund is the leading nonprofit organization that facilitates full latino participation in the american political process, from citizenship to public service.

$750k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$193k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$2.0MCrime & Legal$1.5MEducation$630kHuman Services$503kEnvironment$357kHealth$342kPublic Benefit$288kCommunity Improvement$133kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $694,165 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $749,691 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $55,526 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $252k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $433k
$20,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY INC$192,700
DOMINICANOS USA$91,791
RF CUNY CITIZENSHIP NOW$82,002
HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA$66,875
BAKERRIPLEY$39,100
PROYECTO INMIGRANTE ICS INC$35,750
FLORIDA IMMIGRANT COALITION$32,500
MAKE THE ROAD STATES (MRNY)$26,797
MI CASA$20,800
MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK (MRNY)$20,789
CENTRO CHA$17,368
UNIDOS POR ECUADOR OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$15,000
SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION$11,525
NORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER$11,525
CHIRLA - COALITION FOR HUMANE$10,893
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT (MICOP): $10k → 10%TODEC LEGAL CENTER: $20k → 11%DOMINICANOS USA: $214k → 28%BAKERRIPLEY: $15k → 16%ARKANSAS UNITED: $6k → 14%SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION: $12k → 10%DOMINICANOS USA: $108k → 28%BAKERRIPLEY: $10k → 16%SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION: $5k → 10%MAKE THE ROAD STATES (MRNY): $27k → 20%DOMINICANOS USA: $107k → 28%CENTER FOR IMMIG ADVANCEMENT: $48k → 15%LATIN AMERICAN COALITION: $53k → 10%DOMINICANOS USA: $105k → 28%CENTER FOR IMMIG ADVANCEMENT: $38k → 15%DOMINICANOS USA: $92k → 28%THE LATIN AMERICAN COALITION: $28k → 10%DOMINICANOS USA: $8k → 28%CENTERFORIMMIGADVANC: $23k → 15%DOMINICANOS USA: $6k → 28%CENTER FOR IMMIG ADVANCEMENT: $23k → 15%LATIN AMERICAN COALITION: $10k → 10%MAKETHEROADSTATES NJ: $5k → 20%BAKERRIPLEY: $39k → 16%BAKERRIPLEY: $31k → 16%BAKERRIPLEY: $27k → 16%BAKERRIPLEY: $26k → 16%CENTRO CHA: $20k → 14%BAKERRIPLEY: $18k → 16%CENTRO CHA: $20k → 14%CENTRO CHA: $17k → 14%CENTRO CHA: $15k → 14%CENTRO CHA: $14k → 14%CENTRO CHA: $12k → 14%CENTRO CHA: $6k → 14%CARECEN: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.1M · 29 repeat orgs$780k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
24

Total granted

$5.1M
$748k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+49%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsCrime & LegalHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    Research Foundation of the City University of New York
    8× · 2017–2024 · $555k · revenue +22%
  • CASA INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $445k · revenue +194%
  • HU
    HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $316k · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • CW
    CALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -18%
  • OC
    ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT
    one grant, 2021 · $85k · revenue -29%
  • YV
    YOUNG VISIONARIES LEADERSHIP ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +108%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno

Building Indigenous power through collective action to achieve economic, social and cultural development.

International
2
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
3
La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—
4
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
5
Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services
6
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights
7
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
8
Centro De Ayuda Legal Para Imigrantes of Mountain View

The organization's primary mission is to provide immigration legal services and community education about immigration law. this involves legal representation to the low-income immigrant community, including help to those brought to the us…

Crime & Legal
9
Latino Political Network
—
10
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
11
Al Otro Lado

Al otro lado (aol) provides innovative cross-border legal services to refugees, deportees, and other migrantsin tijuana, mexico and throughout throughout the u.s., with a focus on southern california. aol's mission is to uplift immigrant…

Human Services
12
Central American Legal Assistance

Provide free or low cost legal assistance to latino asylum-seekers.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central American Resource Center - Carecen - of California and the most unlike its peers is Colombian American National Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportYouth Development ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Community College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%20%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/94
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,471

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

83 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
82/83
Grantees still filing
61/83
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY INC — $1,084,931 · Community ImprovementBONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY I…ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT — $85,000 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES O…Youth Action Project Inc — $75,000 · Community ImprovementYouth Action Project IncNorthern Manhattan Coalition For Immigrant Rights — $67,158 · Community ImprovementGALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC — $47,888 · Community Improvement+3 more — $32,900 · Community ImprovementDOMINICANOS USA INC — $639,591 · Human ServicesDOMINICANOS USA INCBakerRipley — $165,600 · Human ServicesBakerRipleyCOLOMBIAN AMERICAN NATIONAL COALITION INC — $132,689 · Human ServicesCOLOMBIAN AMERICAN NATI…CENTRO CHA INC — $104,270 · Human ServicesCENTRO CHA INCLatin American Coalition — $91,490 · Human ServicesLatin American Coalitio…+6 more — $91,334 · Human Services+6 moreCASA INC — $445,458 · OtherCASA INCHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC — $315,839 · OtherHISPANIC UNITY OF FLOR…LATIN AMERICAN COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $82,527 · OtherLATIN AMERICAN COALITI…City college of New York — $72,790 · OtherCity college of New Yo…Chula Vista Elementary School District — $40,000 · Other+13 more — $215,885 · Other+13 moreProyecto Inmigrante ICS Inc — $561,541 · Civil RightsProyecto Inmigra…COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $84,920 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HU…MI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $76,644 · Civil RightsMI FAMILIA EN AC…MI CASA — $57,550 · Civil RightsMI CASAFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $32,500 · Civil Rights+2 more — $32,091 · Civil RightsResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $554,732 · EducationResearch Fou…YOUNG VISIONARIES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $75,000 · EducationYOUNG VISION…Make the Road New York — $174,903 · Crime & LegalCommunity Lawyers Inc — $58,517 · Crime & LegalAmerican Gateways — $58,074 · Crime & LegalLEGACY LA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP — $50,000 · Crime & LegalCALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER — $100,000 · HealthCalifornia Black Womens Health Project — $75,000 · HealthGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $34,702 · HealthALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $16,875 · Health
Community Improvement$1,392,877Human Services$1,224,974Other$1,172,499Civil Rights$845,246Education$629,732Crime & Legal$341,494Health$226,577

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY INC — $1,084,931 over 8y, 28% of budgetDOMINICANOS USA INC — $639,591 over 8y, 18% of budgetProyecto Inmigrante ICS Inc — $561,541 over 8y, 12% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $554,732 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCASA INC — $445,458 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA INC — $315,839 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetMake the Road New York — $174,903 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBakerRipley — $165,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCOLOMBIAN AMERICAN NATIONAL COALITION INC — $132,689 over 5y, 15% of budgetCENTRO CHA INC — $104,270 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetCALEXICO WELLNESS CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLatin American Coalition — $91,490 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORGANIZED FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT — $85,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $84,920 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetMI FAMILIA EN ACCION — $76,644 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetYOUNG VISIONARIES LEADERSHIP ACADEMY — $75,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetYouth Action Project Inc — $75,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCalifornia Black Womens Health Project — $75,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetNorthern Manhattan Coalition For Immigrant Rights — $67,158 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCommunity Lawyers Inc — $58,517 over 5y, 14% of budgetAmerican Gateways — $58,074 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetMI CASA — $57,550 over 3y, 11% of budgetLEGACY LA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP — $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGALEO LATINO COMMUNITY DEVELOP FUND INC — $47,888 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $34,702 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $32,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMake The Road States Inc — $31,809 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR POPULAR DEMOCRACY INC — $24,784 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMexican American Opportunity Foundation — $23,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIDOS POR ECUADOR OF CENTRAL FLORIDA — $22,500 over 3y, 13% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER — $16,925 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION — $16,925 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $16,875 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCEIBA INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetColorado Latino Leadership Advocacy & Research Organization — $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER — $10,100 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetOPTION HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES CENTER — $7,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPACOIMA BEAUTIFUL — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetArkansas United — $6,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Immigrant Legal Resou…The California Endowm…Weingart FoundationUnidosusSierra Health Foundat…Latino Community Foun…California Community …Liberty Hill Foundati…Amalgamated Charitabl…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The California Wellne…Catholic Legal Immigr…
Immigrant Legal Resource CenterCA50.2× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Immigrant Legal Resource Center · The California Endowment · Weingart Foundation · Unidosus · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Latino Community Foundation · California Community Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The California Wellness Foundation · Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Naleo Educational Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Hispanic Unity of Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home