How much did NALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND grant in FY2024?

Community Improvement$1.4MHuman Services$1.2MEducation$630kCrime & Legal$315kCivil Rights$284kHealth$227kPublic Benefit$25kEmployment$23kPhilanthropy$23kOther$1.7M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

naturalization application

2019

naturalization eligibleeligible applicantseligible applicantstoapplicantsto naturalizationcensus orangeorange census

2021

covid vaccinevaccine outreachclaclegaloutreach promotioneducationaids

2022

election protectionelectionsprotection fieldfield expansionexpansion hotlinelegaloutreach

2023

naturaliztion application

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k12 grants · $252k
$50k–250k4 grants · $433k

$20,800

Median grant

States reached

$7.7M

Total assets

Largest grants

BONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY INC$192,700
DOMINICANOS USA$91,791
RF CUNY CITIZENSHIP NOW$82,002
HISPANIC UNITY OF FLORIDA$66,875
BAKERRIPLEY$39,100
PROYECTO INMIGRANTE ICS INC$35,750
FLORIDA IMMIGRANT COALITION$32,500
MAKE THE ROAD STATES (MRNY)$26,797
MI CASA$20,800
MAKE THE ROAD NEW YORK (MRNY)$20,789
CENTRO CHA$17,368
UNIDOS POR ECUADOR OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$15,000
NORTH CAROLINA ASIAN AMERICANS TOGETHER$11,525
SOUTHEAST ASIAN COALITION$11,525
CHIRLA - COALITION FOR HUMANE$10,893

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21% — the area typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$5.0M · 30 repeat orgs$808k to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$5.0M

$776k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%

+104%

Still filing today

77%

72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsCrime & LegalHealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

DU
DOMINICANOS USA
8× · 2017–2024 · $640k · revenue +0%
RC
RF CUNY CITIZENSHIP NOW
8× · 2017–2024 · $555k · revenue +7%
CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT ADVANCEMENT
7× · 2017–2023 · $445k · revenue +139%

Funded once

CW
CALEXICO WELLNESS CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +401%
OC
ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITIES ORG FOR RESPONSIBLE DEV (OCCORD)
one grant, 2021 · $85k · revenue -17%
YA
YOUNG ACTION PROJECTgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $75k · revenue +96%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

La Comunidad Inc

Legal, immigration and community organizing

—

Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal de la Raza provides bilingual, culturally-sensitive legal aid, education, and advocacy for low-income residents of the bay area, particularly monolingual Spanish-speaking immigrants.

Crime & Legal

El Concilio California

Empowering diverse communities in california's central valley.

Human Services

Inquilinos Unidos

Dedicated to empowering low-income tenants through community organizing, education and advocacy to fight for safe, decent and affordable housing in Los Angeles.

Unclassified

Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo

Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.

Civil Rights

La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—

Centro De Ayuda Legal Para

To provide immigration legal services and community education about immigration law.

Crime & Legal

Community Action Service & Advocacy

to mobilize communities to create safe and healthy neighborhoods through research, education, advocacy, and service.

—

California Collaborative for Immigrant

Ccij utilizes coordination, advocacy, and legal services to fight for the liberation of immigrants in detention in california.

—

Latino Union of Chicago

Latino Union works to defend the rights and dignity of contingent workers, including the right to immigrate, work, live free of oppression and violence, and provide for oneself and one's family.

Human Services

Central American Legal Assistance

Assist latin americans with various applications for immigration benefits.

Human Services

Caminar Latino Inc

Caminar latino creates opportunities for latino families to transform their lives and communities and works to change the social conditions that give rise to violence.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Services Immigrant Rights and and the most unlike its peers is Colombian American National Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 22% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/96

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,469

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

81 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

79/81

Grantees still filing

72/81

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,788,737Community Improvement$1,392,877Human Services$1,196,734Education$629,732Crime & Legal$315,037Civil Rights$283,705Health$226,577

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Immigrant Legal Resource CenterCA51.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Latino Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · The California Endowment · Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Unidosus · The California Wellness Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +59% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 272256912 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BONDING AGAINST ADVERSITY INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 28% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Naleo Educational Fund?

Find your warmest path to Naleo Educational Fund through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

81 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Naleo Educational Fund?

More from the funding graph

NALEO EDUCATIONAL FUND

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

81 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Naleo Educational Fund?

More from the funding graph