· Private foundation
Viking Global Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k383 grants · $556k
- $10k–50k21 grants · $394k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $375k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN | $375,000 |
| DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT | $241,000 |
| LENA FOUNDATION | $204,000 |
| FAMILY CENTERS INC | $175,000 |
| JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC | $150,000 |
| BARBERSHOP BOOKS | $150,000 |
| EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC | $150,000 |
| FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC | $150,000 |
| CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY | $150,000 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $150,000 |
| READ TO GROW INC | $150,000 |
| NEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT (NYRP) | $125,000 |
| BARBERSHOP BOOKS | $100,000 |
| STAMFORD PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC (SPEF) | $100,000 |
| SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
365 repeat relationships — 182 still active in FY2024, 183 since wound down; 93 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $620k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC7× · 2017–2024 · $975k · revenue +11%- NYNEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC6× · 2017–2022 · $958k · revenue +440%
- CHCYPRESS HILLS CHILD CARE CORPORATION5× · 2018–2023 · $935k · revenue +44%
Funded once
- FFFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORKone grant, 2017 · $275k
- HGHUDSON GUILDone grant, 2017 · $200k
- CLCHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTERSone grant, 2020 · $170k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Kallol of New Jersey. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
707 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 707 of the 977 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROOM TO GROW NATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK IMMIGRATION COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds CYPRESS HILLS CHILD CARE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds ALL OUR KIN INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds Advocates for Children of New York ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds STAMFORD PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INSPIRICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE DIAPER BANK OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds HOUR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LENA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds BARBERSHOP BOOKS INC ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR PUBLIC HEALTH IN NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds READ TO GROW INC ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EQUITY ADVOCATES INC ↗
- Who funds TEACHING MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Robin Hood Foundation · The Lazard Charitable Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Pitney Bowes Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Warburg Pincus Foundation · Alexander Family Foundation Inc · The Near and Far Association Inc · The Tudor Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Viking Global Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc — 49% of income from government
- Kids in Crisis Inc — 49% of income from government
- Family & Children's Agency Inc — 47% of income from government
- Pathways Inc — 45% of income from government
- Edadvance — 41% of income from government
- Inspirica Inc — 30% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Gbapp Inc — 25% of income from government
- Connecticut Council for Philanthropy — 24% of income from government
- Reclaim Childhood Inc — 24% of income from government
- Stamford Public Education Foundation Inc — 22% of income from government
- Family Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
- Steep Rock Association Inc — 19% of income from government
- Champions for Children Inc — 14% of income from government
- United Way of Coastal and Western Connecticut Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Community Fund of Darien — 9% of income from government
- Stamford Museum & Nature Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc — 5% of income from government
- Person to Person Inc — 5% of income from government
- Soundwaters Inc — 4% of income from government
- Greenwich Alliance for Education Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- The Norwalk Youth Symphony Inc — 2% of income from government
- All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Viking Global Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Viking Global Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.