Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC (New York) is funded by 45 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $2,883,895 in grants to it, the largest being BIALKIN FAMILY FOUNDATION ($1,125,000). 20 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,380 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,380 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 6 funders to 8 as grant income moved $74k → $403k.
10 of 45 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 45 funders by total. Association, not causation.
AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 58%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 20% · 2019 34% · 2020 35% · 2021 43% · 2022 58% · 2023 23% · 2024 62% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
26% of AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 44% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
AMERICA-ISRAEL FRIENDSHIP LEAGUE INC is locally rooted: 68% of its grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 45 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
31% of spending goes to programs.
70%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 4 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 45funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing