Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Baykeeper

Baykeeper (California) receives grants from 70 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,437,064 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($1,184,100). 41 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.1M
Funders on record
70
Grants received
$6.4M
Net assets
$2.8M
41/70 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 52%
01What it does

What Baykeeper does

Mission

San francisco Baykeepers ("Baykeeper") mission is to defend san francisco bays communities and wildlife from the biggest environmental threats. Baykeepers field investigators and scientists patrol the bay to uncover those threats. Our lawyers reduce environmental problems at the source and advocate for agencies to strengthen laws.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Baykeeper investigates environmental threats and advocates for agencies to adopt stronger policies that will protect communities and wildlife in and around san francisco bay. Since 1989, we have secured 300 wins and conducted over 17,000 hours of boat patrols to investigate environmental problems.we have a staff of sixteen, a board of directors with a breadth of experience with the bay, an expert advisory board, a team of volunteer boat skippers, and the only patrol boat regularly monitoring and investigating environmental issues in the bay.Baykeeper incorporated as a nonprofit, public benefit corporation in california on january 23, 1987, as the san francisco bay-delta preservation association, and became Baykeeper in may 1989, the fourth waterkeeper organization in the country. For 37 years, standing up to constant threats, Baykeeper has been a fierce champion for san francisco bay. For more information, please visit us online at Baykeeper.org.

    $2,443,811 spent$1,281,584 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $2,443,811.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.5M) Net assets 100 ($1.1M)2018 Revenue 103 ($1.7M) Expenses 111 ($1.7M) Net assets 102 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 93 ($1.5M) Expenses 105 ($1.6M) Net assets 96 ($1.1M)2020 Revenue 91 ($1.5M) Expenses 99 ($1.5M) Net assets 89 ($1.0M)2021 Revenue 79 ($1.3M) Expenses 98 ($1.5M) Net assets 78 ($896k)2022 Revenue 157 ($2.6M) Expenses 111 ($1.7M) Net assets 152 ($1.7M)2023 Revenue 128 ($2.1M) Expenses 150 ($2.3M) Net assets 140 ($1.6M)2024 Revenue 136 ($2.2M) Expenses 140 ($2.1M) Net assets 152 ($1.7M)2025 Revenue 251 ($4.1M) Expenses 205 ($3.1M) Net assets 243 ($2.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (251)Expenses (205)Net assets (243)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $2.4M to $4.0M (+70%).

$1.4M
$1.6M
$1.6M
$1.6M
$1.5M
$2.2M
$2.4M
$2.4M
$4.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 13% · 2022 9% · 2024 0% · 2025 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

68% of Baykeeper’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$126k
’17
$7k
’18
−$70k
’19
−$16k
’20
−$187k
’21
$890k
’22
−$164k
’23
$112k
’24
$1.0M
’25
10
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

David Jedrzejek JD

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed101012111211151517
Joined·+0+4+1+4+4+5+2+2
No longer listed·02235120
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 16 funders to 31 funders, grant income rose $427k → $910k.

14 of 70 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 46% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Baykeeper’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 70 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Baykeeper has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 18% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left

65% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Baykeeper.

18%
largest funder
37%
top three
~14
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 45% · 2018 22% · 2019 16% · 2020 18% · 2021 19% · 2022 60% · 2023 27% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

46% of Baykeeper's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

76% of Baykeeper's grant income comes from California funders.

VT
WA
IL
NY
NV
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
NM
TN
DC
GA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $3.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 10 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Baykeeper holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,074 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin25% · above the median
Months of reserve10.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,074 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Baykeeper

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 8%Fundraising 14%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Baykeeper: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Baykeeper?
Baykeeper (California) receives grants from 70 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,437,064 to it, the largest being NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ($1,184,100). 41 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Baykeeper have?
IRS filings report 70 organizations giving $6,437,064 in grants to Baykeeper, 41 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Baykeeper?
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $1,184,100 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Baykeeper find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Baykeeper →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 70 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing