Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

CarbonPlan

CarbonPlan (California) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,639,761 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($3,360,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$3.5M
Funders on record
25
Grants received
$12M
Net assets
$5.9M
12/25 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 91%
01What it does

What CarbonPlan does

Mission

Improving the transparency and scientific integrity of climate solutions through open data and tools.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Research & Development Refers broadly to analysis in support of our strategic or exploratory objectives. Often involves deep-dive domain-specific investigation alongside cross-cutting analysis of projects and programs. Primary activities include writing code and documentation, organizing and analyzing data, visualizing information, engaging in external collaborations, and documenting research results.

    $2,051,817 spent$60,318 earned by the program
    83% of program spending
  2. Policy & Comms Refers broadly to evaluating, and strategically engaging with, legal, governmental, or regulatory processes. Also includes the external-facing communication of all of our work. Primary activities include engaging with journalists, reviewing legal and regulatory materials, responding to public comment solicitations, and writing a variety of external-facing content.

    $430,006 spent
    17% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,481,823.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($2.2M) Expenses 100 ($537k) Net assets 100 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 180 ($3.9M) Expenses 309 ($1.7M) Net assets 238 ($3.9M)2022 Revenue 115 ($2.5M) Expenses 452 ($2.4M) Net assets 242 ($4.0M)2023 Revenue 207 ($4.5M) Expenses 557 ($3.0M) Net assets 342 ($5.6M)2024 Revenue 159 ($3.5M) Expenses 590 ($3.2M) Net assets 360 ($5.9M)
20202021202220232024
Revenue (159)Expenses (590)Net assets (360)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $1.7M to $4.0M (+135%).

$1.7M
$4.0M
$4.1M
$5.9M
$6.0M
20202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 7% · 2022 19% · 2023 14% · 2024 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

92% of CarbonPlan’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.6M
’20
$2.3M
’21
$80k
’22
$1.5M
’23
$301k
’24
2.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jeremy Freeman

Exec. Dir./Pres

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

20202021202220232024
Listed37111412
Joined·+5+5+5+1
No longer listed·1123
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 11 funders, grant income rose $460k → $3.1M.

7 of 25 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 56% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CarbonPlan’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CarbonPlan leans on a few funders — its largest provides 29% of grant income and the top three 64%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

60% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CarbonPlan.

29%
largest funder
64%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 54% · 2021 66% · 2022 31% · 2023 32% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

17% of CarbonPlan's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

56% of CarbonPlan's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $5.1M that is directly attributable, 63% of it comes from California funders.

NY
MA
CT
CA
MO
MD
DE
DC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $6.6M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CarbonPlan runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,186 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin9% · above the median
Months of reserve2.8mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,186 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding CarbonPlan receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.6M on record.

Federal$1.6M
grants $1.6Mcontracts $0
21
22
23
Top agencies
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration$1.6M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CarbonPlan

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 22%Fundraising 4%

Governance

5
board members
80%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

77%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CarbonPlan: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CarbonPlan?
CarbonPlan (California) receives grants from 25 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,639,761 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($3,360,000). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CarbonPlan have?
IRS filings report 25 organizations giving $11,639,761 in grants to CarbonPlan, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CarbonPlan?
Silicon Valley Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $3,360,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CarbonPlan find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds CarbonPlan →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 25 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing